• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Where to buy ballistic ear protection/plugs?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I remember when i was on OJT at 403 sqn, standing outside the griffon to do external checks with the FE and found that the helmet did a good job at reducing the noise from the engines.   For some reason though, i find that even with my headset on, the APU on the aurora is insanely noisy.
 
Infanteer said:
No kidding - not even in and he's making demands....

For your information I am "in" the artillery in the reserves
Secondly, have a look at this:

Remember, noise-induced hearing loss is 100 percent preventable by properly using earplugs and/or earmuffs regularly. A rule of thumb is that when noise is loud enough that you need to 'raise your voice' to be heard at a distance of three feet or less, you are risking long-term hearing damage. It is recommended that hearing protection be used when the noise level around you meets or exceeds 85 dBA.

Type of Gun and Peak Sound Pressure Level

.44 Revolver 170 dB
45 Automatic 165 dB
M-16 160 dB
.357 Revolver  160 dB
12 Gauge Shotgun 155 dB
.38 Revolver 150 dB
.22 Rifle 145 dB

Clearly you can see that these simple things are all over 85db....even a car backfiring is over 85db...ANYTHING OVER 85DB CAN RESULT IN PERMANENT HEARING DAMAGE...
 
tannerthehammer said:
For your information I am "in" the artillery in the reserves
Secondly, have a look at this:

Remember, noise-induced hearing loss is 100 percent preventable by properly using earplugs and/or earmuffs regularly. A rule of thumb is that when noise is loud enough that you need to 'raise your voice' to be heard at a distance of three feet or less, you are risking long-term hearing damage. It is recommended that hearing protection be used when the noise level around you meets or exceeds 85 dBA.

Type of Gun and Peak Sound Pressure Level

.44 Revolver 170 dB
45 Automatic 165 dB
M-16 160 dB
.357 Revolver   160 dB
12 Gauge Shotgun 155 dB
.38 Revolver 150 dB
.22 Rifle 145 dB

Clearly you can see that these simple things are all over 85db....even a car backfiring is over 85db...ANYTHING OVER 85DB CAN RESULT IN PERMANENT HEARING DAMAGE...

I see you are still missing the point  ::)
 
As you are missing mine :boring:  All I am saying is why give someone hearing protection that is 75% safe when you can give them protection that makes hearing loss 100% preventable?
 
If you are that worried I would advise forgoing the CF and find a nice quiet job. A library might be a good choice....
 
Ex-Dragoon said:
If you are that worried I would advise forgoing the CF and find a nice quiet job. A library might be a good choice....

So are you saying that you are opposed to the CF re-evaluating policy with the possibility to make the lives of its soldiers safer and better?
 
tannerthehammer said:
For your information I am "in" the artillery in the reserves

http://forums.army.ca/forums/threads/29912.0.html

Considering you "Got the Call" about a month ago, then you are just a civvie with green clothes (unless they somehow found a BMQ for you and launched you through it in a month).

Secondly, have a look at this:

As I said before, the people here work day-in and day-out with this stuff; if there was a genuine problem, they would tell you about it.

Obviously, you don't want to hear what they have to say, so you may as well quit posting questions and statements on the topic.  Since you are a recruit now, why don't you write a letter with all your problems and send it here:

Office of the Ombudsman
100 Metcalfe Street
12th floor
Ottawa, ON K1P 5M1
 
tannerthehammer said:
As you are missing mine :boring:

Listen kid, as misguided as it is, i see your point.  What you are missing is that the current ear protection provided by the CF is adequate and that if you are ordered to use only the issued equipment you are legaly bound to obey it regardless of your personal " not warm and fuzzy" on the subject.

Someone issues a legal order = you doing it.......end
 
tannerthehammer said:
As you are missing mine :boring:   All I am saying is why give someone hearing protection that is 75% safe when you can give them protection that makes hearing loss 100% preventable?

And you're going to hear the words of command how? You don't wear intercoms. If you block out all the gun noise, you're blocking out the words of command too. Pretty counter productive to getting things done. It's a necessary evil, you're going to be subject to some noise in order to hear and understand orders that are given to you. It's a trade off just like everything else. You could be better protected from gun fire with thicker ballistic plates but the extra weight makes moving almost impossible. See my point?

Look on the bright side, a gun blast is momentary, try listening to a pair of screaming jet engines for 3 hours straight.
 
Infanteer said:
http://forums.army.ca/forums/threads/29912.0.html

Considering you "Got the Call" about a month ago, then you are just a civvie with green clothes (unless they somehow found a BMQ for you and launched you through it in a month).

Funny, i was just thinking that  ;D  I guess getting the call gives you just enough knowledge to be able to make stupid statements.  
 
tannerthehammer said:
So are you saying that you are opposed to the CF re-evaluating policy with the possibility to make the lives of its soldiers safer and better?

Not sure where you got that as I have never even implied that. I was suggesting you forego a career in the CF as this is a serious hang up for you. As I said in another post the CF does take safety seriously, what we are saying is just not getting through to you.
 
Well, considering that the question has been answered and a link to good information has been provided, I think we can lock this one up as well, lest we recieve another earful (ack, I need hearing protection) of Mr. TannertheHammer's lectures....

Ex-Dragoon, you want the honours?
 
aesop081 said:
Listen kid, as misguided as it is, i see your point.  What you are missing is that the current ear protection provided by the CF is adequate and that if you are ordered to use only the issued equipment you are legaly bound to obey it regardless of your personal " not warm and fuzzy" on the subject.

Someone issues a legal order = you doing it.......end

First of all I'm not a kid considering I'm 25, 2ndly I don't believe that just because the army says something is "adequate" that it can't/shouldn't be improved on if possible...This program was done in 1976 surely it could be re-evaluated considering its 30 years old...

CFAO 34-22 -- HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM



PURPOSE
1.     This order introduces the Hearing Conservation Program.  This program
is given comprehensive treatment and technical amplification in CFMO 40-01
and CFP 119.

GENERAL
2.     The conservation of hearing is a common objective to all members of
the Canadian Forces.  The work environment of the Canadian Forces contains
many areas of high noise hazards such as weapons systems, aircraft and
military vehicle engines and industrial workshops.  Exposure to high
intensity noise may not only render permanent damage to the hearing, but
produce other physical and psychological effects.
3.     There is no method available for predicting an individual's
susceptibility to hearing loss induced by high-intensity noise.  Since such
hearing loss is irremediable and irreversible, hearing conservation is of
paramount importance.
4.     The Hearing Conservation Program is designed to protect hearing in the
work environment of bases, ships or units by the following methods:
    a.   reduction of noise levels of equipment either by change of
         location or by engine modification;

    b.   identification and marking of areas in which hazardous noises
         occur;

    c.   periodic audiometry and identification of personnel susceptible
         or at risk, and prevention of further hearing loss;

    d.   provision of adequate hearing protection devices to personnel
         exposed to high-intensity noises; and

    e.   a continuing educational program dealing with the aims and
         endeavours of the Hearing Conservation Program.

RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM5.     SURGEON GENERAL.  The Surgeon General is responsible for policy
concerning all aspects of the program, as outlined in CFMO 40-01.
6.     COMMAND SURGEON.  The command surgeon coordinates medical aspects of
the program within his region of responsibility, as outlined in CFMO 40-01.
7.     BASE COMMANDER.  The base commander is responsible for implementing
the Base Hearing Conservation Program.  For this purpose, he will establish
a base hearing conservation committee, which may be a sub-committee of the
Base General Safety Committee.
8.     BASE HEARING CONSERVATION COMMITTEE.  This committee could be chaired
by the base technical services officer, and must include a medical officer,
unit or section representative, and the senior base hygiene technician.
Its terms of reference shall include:
    a.   identifying areas and sources of potential noise hazard;

    b.   arranging for an initial sound survey as required;

    c.   requesting other sound surveys as required;

    d.   receiving the recommendations arising from sound surveys, and
         ensuring that the recommendations are carried out wherever
         possible;

    e.   ensuring that all areas in which hazardous noises occur are
         properly marked and that their existence is known to all
         concerned;

    f.   promoting an education program on the base to ensure that
         protective measures are applied; and

    g.   ensuring that hearing conservation measures are continually in
         force.

9.     BASE SURGEON.  The base surgeon assumes ultimate responsibility for
the medical responsibilities of the Base Hearing Conservation Committee as
well as the responsibilities outlined in CFMO 40-01.

10.    PROJECT MANAGERS.  The NDHQ project manager is responsible for
requesting the opinion of the Surgeon General/DPM on any aspects of hearing
conservation relative to the purchase, installation or maintenance of new
equipment, as outlined in CFP 119.


(C)                                     1605-34-22 (DPM)

Issued 9 Jul 76

Supersedes pages 1 to 6 of order in AL 16/68, pages 7 and 8 of order in AL
35/68, and Annexes A, B, C and D in AL 16/68.

INDEXHearing
Medical
 
Tannerthehammer:

I see 3 words in your future...........failiure to adapt
 
tannerthehammer said:
First of all I'm not a kid considering I'm 25, 2ndly I don't believe that just because the army says something is "adequate" that it can't/shouldn't be improved on if possible...

WHAT'S THAT?!?  CAN'T HEAR YOU - BEEN TO THE RANGE TOO MANY TIMES....
 
Tanner,
  According to a medical journal published recently( last month ) in ProQuest Nursing Journals hearing loss associated with "loud Noise" is acceptably prevented by wearing foam ear plugs, I won't go into the inner workings of the ear because it would take far too much time, but the amount of force/noise to permantly cause damage to the tympanic membrane, cochlea, and minute hairs that detect vibration is extremly high. You may experience some hearing loss with the noise of loud guns sure, but the majority of that hearing loss is caused by the hairs in your ear laying down and it takes a little while for them to stand erect again. In order to permantly cause them to refrain from growth you would have to be subjected to that same noise repeatedly for quite some time without a break. That does not happen as the CF has done adequate research into this issue and has come up with a solution of handing out ear plugs for you to protect yourself with. If you choose not to wear them, as was already stated in this post, then it is on you and not the CF. Furthermore, if you do feel that you are unable to cope with what has already been deemed appropriate and acceptable recourse to this issue perhaps you should field your energies to another area. As per a whole this issue has been taken care of by the CF and the others who have responded to this post. you have been given links on where to go to find other protection. You can lead a horse to water........
 
So let me get this straight. You say we are not medically qualified to answer your questions yet we use this equipment day in and day out, have safety training up the ying yang but you feel you are more qualified then us to know what is safe and what is not??  ::)

Oie!
 
Rebel_RN said:
Tanner,
  According to a medical journal published recently( last month ) in ProQuest Nursing Journals hearing loss associated with "loud Noise" is acceptably prevented by wearing foam ear plugs, I won't go into the inner workings of the ear because it would take far too much time, but the amount of force/noise to permantly cause damage to the tympanic membrane, cochlea, and minute hairs that detect vibration is extremly high. You may experience some hearing loss with the noise of loud guns sure, but the majority of that hearing loss is caused by the hairs in your ear laying down and it takes a little while for them to stand erect again. In order to permantly cause them to refrain from growth you would have to be subjected to that same noise repeatedly for quite some time without a break. That does not happen as the CF has done adequate research into this issue and has come up with a solution of handing out ear plugs for you to protect yourself with. If you choose not to wear them, as was already stated in this post, then it is on you and not the CF. Furthermore, if you do feel that you are unable to cope with what has already been deemed appropriate and acceptable recourse to this issue perhaps you should field your energies to another area. As per a whole this issue has been taken care of by the CF and the others who have responded to this post. you have been given links on where to go to find other protection. You can lead a horse to water........
Thank you RN...hopefully Tanner will feel you are qualified as you basically conformed what we have been trying to tell him.
 
Rebel_RN said:
Furthermore, if you do feel that you are unable to cope with what has already been deemed appropriate and acceptable recourse to this issue perhaps you should field your energies to another area. As per a whole this issue has been taken care of by the CF and the others who have responded to this post. you have been given links on where to go to find other protection. You can lead a horse to water........

That says it all - thank you RN.

Infanteer Out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top