KevinB
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 25,234
- Points
- 1,260
Somewhere around MoscowSure. Are they expected to fight? At what point is the butcher's bill expected to dissolve resolve?

Somewhere around MoscowSure. Are they expected to fight? At what point is the butcher's bill expected to dissolve resolve?
I really have no objection to this. The only thing I’d add is to mark and record every mine laid and not scattered Willy nilly
Meh, sometimes you need to be able to dispense an ass-ton fast. I’m more concerned about proper boundary marking than individual mines, especially due to submunitions.I really have no objection to this. The only thing I’d add is to mark and record every mine laid and not scattered Willy nilly
The issue I think is more what you're protecting...and what you're walking away from.You got to figure at this point a few once’s of prevention should be taken by the province.
Cutting 500m wide firebreaks every 25km or so and a 5km break every 100km with upgrading of road networks and camp facilities to support firefighting activities.
Invest in some SMR’s, and create some artificial lakes off some the current rivers to provide water basins to aid fire fighting efforts.
Get more rotary and fixed wing water bombers.
The Military shouldn’t be a first responder to annual domestic issues.
But tankers, helicopters, fire breaks are useless unless you have manpower to back them up. Aviation gets alot of media attention, bulldozers less, and the crews often less again. And like the Army...if all you have are privates then somewhere you need to build up additional supervision (NCO's and Officers) which adds to camp costs/summer budgets. And like the CAF almost all the of Wildfire response agencies are also dealing with hiring challenges and retention issues which is also affecting response. It's almost like we're both in search of the same people - young, fit, motivated, and able to move on a moment's notice for the next assignment.
Nothing to see here folks, or the Commissar will get you...
Using DT thoughts, then the revolutionary war was utterly pointless as well.He's not wrong...
He does believe it is the right of kings & presidents to enrich themselves through their powers of office. The revolutionary war went against that.Using DT thoughts, then the revolutionary war was utterly pointless as well.
Beat me to it.Using DT thoughts, then the revolutionary war was utterly pointless as well.
This does not appear to be ending well.
![]()
The Trump "Final" Proposal For Ukraine
Phillips’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication.phillipspobrien.substack.com
Russia gets:
View attachment 92877
Russia pays no price.
In fairness to Chamberlain, he was playing for time because he knew Britain was not ready for war. Still not a good look though.
Trump selling out Ukraine is less analogous to Chamberlain and more like the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. Trump has threatened military or economic force to annex territory from democracies. He wants to normalize a world where powerful nations are entitled to seize what they want from neighbours.
Here's your sign, Mr. Rubio...
All he is normalizing is the proliferation of nuclear weapons.Trump selling out Ukraine is less analogous to Chamberlain and more like the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. Trump has threatened military or economic force to annex territory from democracies. He wants to normalize a world where powerful nations are entitled to seize what they want from neighbours.
Plus all the lower-level arming up and eyeballing the neighbours that comes with a less settled approach to borders.All he is normalizing is the proliferation of nuclear weapons.
Well hey we got to sell weapons somewhere now that NATO has been given a reason to question the reliability of the supplier.Plus all the lower-level arming up and eyeballing the neighbours that comes with a less settled approach to borders.
Do you still work for KAC? Has there been a noticeable downtrend of business or sales?Well hey we got to sell weapons somewhere now that NATO has been given a reason to question the reliability of the supplier.
![]()