• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trump administration 2024-2028

Also, how is this even enforceable? Movies have thousands of employees and contractors, are tariffs being paid on every single thing an overseas contractor does? If so, that certainly seems to be opening the Pandora's Box for retaliatory tariffs on services which could significantly harm the US economy. If you thought goods caused a market disruption, you ain't seen nothing yet.
 

See, this is why everyone who has a goddamned clue has been saying since day 1 that the reliance on insecure comms and transmitting classified information on them is actually a big deal.

Communications encryption protocols are only part of communication security. Communications are a system, and communications systems are vulnerable where they rely on weak devices, and are also vulnerable because of the stupidest users. It will hardly be a shock to anyone familiar with government appointees that those can be pretty weak and pretty stupid.
 
Also, how is this even enforceable? Movies have thousands of employees and contractors, are tariffs being paid on every single thing an overseas contractor does? If so, that certainly seems to be opening the Pandora's Box for retaliatory tariffs on services which could significantly harm the US economy. If you thought goods caused a market disruption, you ain't seen nothing yet.

It's an interesting, and complex, industry driven by lowest cost practices both in and out of the USA. The Newsom factor is something I didn't twig on until I read this ....

Trump’s movie tariffs are designed to destroy the international film industry​


Vague and grandstanding as the US president’s messaging may be, it has serious ramifications which could wipe out large sections of the film business

More pragmatically, Trump appears to be taking aim at the system of tax subsidies that allow Hollywood producers to accrue large sums if they shoot at studios in qualifying countries. It was recently revealed, for example, that Universal Studios received £89m from UK taxpayers after agreeing to film Jurassic World: Rebirth in Elstree in Hertfordshire. This partly explains the decline in film production in Los Angeles – nearly 40% in the last decade, according to FilmLA – but the California film industry has also been under attack from other production centres in the US, where states such as New York and Georgia offer tax incentives. California governor Gavin Newsom, a regular target of Trump, recently announced a $750m scheme to try to reverse the industry decline in his state, and Trump’s announcement was in some ways clearly a shot across his bows after Newsom filed a lawsuit in April against Trump’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA) to impose tariffs in other industries.

 
This is the stupidest thing so far, what would you even use to calculate a tariff on? There is no physical product. And if you do filming in one location, but editing in another and post production somewhere else, what does that even look like?

The proliferation of international movies and tv is awesome for the consumer.

For people that are proponents of free market capitalism, this seems an awful lot like government controlled markets you would find in communism.
 
This is the stupidest thing so far, what would you even use to calculate a tariff on? There is no physical product. And if you do filming in one location, but editing in another and post production somewhere else, what does that even look like?

The proliferation of international movies and tv is awesome for the consumer.

For people that are proponents of free market capitalism, this seems an awful lot like government controlled markets you would find in communism (and Keynesians (like Carney).

There, FTFY ;)
 
This is the stupidest thing so far, what would you even use to calculate a tariff on? There is no physical product. And if you do filming in one location, but editing in another and post production somewhere else, what does that even look like?

The proliferation of international movies and tv is awesome for the consumer.

For people that are proponents of free market capitalism, this seems an awful lot like government controlled markets you would find in communism.
You only need five pencils, comrade.
 
You only need five pencils, comrade.
Sidebar, but honestly the best thing by far about going to Carling is not having to beg someone to get a pencil or a pen from a locked supply cupboard. Walking into one of the staffed supply rooms and being able to get a few pens, a notebook, dry erase markers etc when I need them is amazing.

Weird how much something so small really makes my day, but now have to break the habit of buying my own stuff because I didn't feel like arguing with the apparatchik to get 2 pens or something.
 
Sidebar, but honestly the best thing by far about going to Carling is not having to beg someone to get a pencil or a pen from a locked supply cupboard. Walking into one of the staffed supply rooms and being able to get a few pens, a notebook, dry erase markers etc when I need them is amazing.

Weird how much something so small really makes my day, but now have to break the habit of buying my own stuff because I didn't feel like arguing with the apparatchik to get 2 pens or something.
Wait until you need something unusual...
 
See, this is why everyone who has a goddamned clue has been saying since day 1 that the reliance on insecure comms and transmitting classified information on them is actually a big deal.

Communications encryption protocols are only part of communication security. Communications are a system, and communications systems are vulnerable where they rely on weak devices, and are also vulnerable because of the stupidest users. It will hardly be a shock to anyone familiar with government appointees that those can be pretty weak and pretty stupid.
TeleMessage us iwned by Smarsh.
Smarsh is a competitor with Global Relay.

They are both US Government compliant message archive companies. Almost all government agencies, the financial and insurance industries use one or the other.

The data is stored highly encrypted, cannot be decrypted by the vendor and is only accessible to the customers authorized IT security teams.

Global Relay from Vancouver is by far the more dominant and reliable of the two.
 
TeleMessage us iwned by Smarsh.
Smarsh is a competitor with Global Relay.

They are both US Government compliant message archive companies. Almost all government agencies, the financial and insurance industries use one or the other.

The data is stored highly encrypted, cannot be decrypted by the vendor and is only accessible to the customers authorized IT security teams.

Global Relay from Vancouver is by far the more dominant and reliable of the two.
And yet some content data is reported to be breached. Note that I specifically was speaking about classified information that should never be on Signal, and that has more stringent security standards than this apparently did. I have no issue with TM/Signal being used for communications up to the level it’s approved for. This is a good demo of why different levels exist to trade off convenience and security.
 
The only way to copy signal data is to lift it off the device after decryption. So yes there’s a breach somewhere back in the Smarsh system, likely right on their own API.

Unless things have really changed, a mobile device is not cleared for anything above Confidential, is managed in a MDM environment* with no external parties, has a dongle in the USB and Bluetooth disabled or restricted to a smart card. Mr. Walz was doing none of that. And certainly what he has been messaging is far above Confidential.

* and that’s with the device pretty much locked right down with no 3rd party apps.
 
The only way to copy signal data is to lift it off the device after decryption. So yes there’s a breach somewhere back in the Smarsh system, likely right on their own API.

Unless things have really changed, a mobile device is not cleared for anything above Confidential, is managed in a MDM environment* with no external parties, has a dongle in the USB and Bluetooth disabled or restricted to a smart card. Mr. Walz was doing none of that. And certainly what he has been messaging is far above Confidential.

* and that’s with the device pretty much locked right down with no 3rd party apps.
Yup- hence my mention earlier of 'weak devices'.

It's no secret that even civilian police have some ability to compromise and exploit physical devices and catch what would otherwise be encrypted messaging content. That's just cops going after drug dealers. State intelligence entities interested in the devices of administration officials will probably have more to throw at it.
 
Now I'm curious what an unusual stationary request would be, did you ask for a red Swingline stapler? Hilariously they are more expensive thanks to Office Space.
All PPNS budgets were transferred. If you spent it on non white paper (for example), going forward you must provide a fin code to get what you previously paid for with the budget they took away from you.
 
Comrade Donald says your children don’t need more than two dolls and 5 pencils.


First it was the dolls. Now it’s pencils.

Surely, by now you know this iconic story. At a cabinet meeting this week, Trump, that avatar of gaudy excess, lectured Americans on the need for austerity, arguing that “maybe the children will have 2 dolls instead of 30 dolls, and maybe the 2 dolls will cost a couple of bucks more than they would normally.”

This seemed to be an admission that Trump knew that his tariffs would, indeed, stick it to consumers. So, NBC’s Kristin Welker followed up: “Are you saying your tariffs will cause some prices to go up?” Welker asked Trump. Blather ensued, but then we got this:

“I don't think a beautiful baby girl that's 11 years old needs to have 30 dolls,” Trump said. “I think they can have 3 dolls or 4 dolls. They don't need to have 250 pencils. They can have five.”
Quipped University of Michigan professor Justin Wolfers: "The Department of Central Planning and Child Rearing has figured out the optimal number of dolls and pencils each child should have to make beautiful Republic.”1

By telling Americans how many dolls and pencils they need, conservative radio host Erick Erickson said, Trump was channeling the worst sort of “nanny statism — the government knows best how many dolls and pencils you need. Not you. Not your parents. In government we trust.”

Free market conservatives used to understand that this sort of thing was a bad idea. How many dolls do you need? Pencils? In a free market, free individuals make those choices and decisions. It wasn’t decided by central planners or the State. Those decisions were made by consumers, and in the case of dolls, by parents.

Indeed, this all sounded oddly familiar. Noted Political prof Robert E. Kelly: “MAGA loves to call its opponents ‘communists,’ but this is literally a neo-Marxist critique of consumerism.” And by “literally,” he means literally.

It’s also the kind of thing you’d expect to hear from (checks notes) Bernie Sanders, who rather famously, insisted that “You don't necessarily need a choice of 23 underarm spray deodorants or of 18 different pairs of sneakers….”

But now, this is what we get from the leader of the formerly free market-oriented GOP.

Former ambassador Michael McFaul detected something else: “This is the opposite of the free market. Sounds a lot like communism to me. Soviet leaders also dictated to consumers their limited choice.”

But now, it is the new MAGA dogma — and the reversal is head-snapping and vertiginous. Not only has the Trumpian right now embraced neo-Marxian critiques of consumerism, but the president who ran on prosperity and lower prices is now insisting that working class families only need a couple of dolls and just five pencils.2

From the same article…

Speaking of Soviet Style​

Not a parody. The Defense Department actually, really, and truly posted this:

 
Back
Top