• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Canada moves to 2% GDP end of FY25/26 - PMMC

A hundred days? Under two succesive liberal governments, we've not had a budget in 439 days and we have the same finacial genius holding this one up that held up trudeau's. Even freeland didn’t have the stomach to table his last POS.
And? The budget covers a fiscal year so dropping a big number like 439 days like its a big deal when its not shows your own bias here. It's been 72 days since the new fiscal year started, during the time we had an election, and now, given it can take upto 30 days for ministers to really start getting a handle on their departments. We really are in the first month of pure business, which parliament is about to rise for the summer.

Demanding a budget from ministers who probably haven't even been fully briefed yet and have a handle on their departments is asking for failure. A fall budget half way through the fiscal year is fine. The GoC has contingencies for this.

I don't recall this level of complaints when the budget was tabled on Dec 10th 2001, may 2nd 2006, June 11 2011.

Other historical examples include the 1957 budget delivered on Dec 6, Oct 14th 1971, November 16th 1978, Dec 11 1979


This is hardly earth shattering for a late budget.
 
Yeah. I don't think anything would really happen if Carney just fucked off the budget.
The LPC went over the deficit by 22 billion dollars and everyone just shrugged.

People think they care because the news articles they read say "So and so did this thing, and this is why you should care".
If the CPC keeps lamenting budget budget budget, by the time it will matter, they will sound exactly the same they have for months on end so no one will really be paying attention anymore.

It’s like calling for resignations all the time. When it comes time to actually, truly call for one, people think you’re just singing the same song you always have.
 
Navy_Pete you are looking at this all wrong, you have set yourself up to come back as a consultant at $300/hour.
The thought has crossed my mind a few times, and could also take it international as it's transferable.

Occasionally look at the math for it, but pretty close to the immediate annuity so the golden handcuffs are real. But the big consultant dollars plus dependable income stream is kind of a no brainer. There are a few that I've seen where they actually get paid their rate, and the existing service provider subcontracts them for it and takes a markup, which seems like the best option for the individual.

Suspect there are a lot of people with niche talents across a lot of trades and ranks that also don't have any real opportunities to share and pass on that knowledge with people in their trade.

I really enjoy mentoring as well, so seems like there are just a lot of lost opportunities to help grow other people with at least a good starting point to know what questions to ask. Ah well.
 
I’m not doing anything for under $400 /hr plus expenses, and I’m just a has been knuckledragger so I would expect that more is charged by others.

And that is friend pricing, the rate goes up as my dislike increases.
I’ll leave contracting with the banks and come work for you for 250$/hr plus expenses, lol
 
I’ll leave contracting with the banks and come work for you for 250$/hr plus expenses, lol

200.gif
 
The most common contracting vehicle with DND is a THS (or variations thereof), which is for a max of 48 week (can be extended by 26 weeks, for a max of 400K, incl HST. That works out to gross $260/hr.....
I’m doubting McKinsey only takes that from the CAF…
 
You remember that ReArm Europe fund that Carney wants to sign up for? A packet of European money he can use to buy weapons for you?


France blocking Britain from EU’s massive defence fund​

Paris seeking to restrict member states to purchasing weapons made mostly within the bloc, diplomatic sources claim

France is trying to shut out British arms firms from the EU’s defence industrial programme despite the post-Brexit reset.

A diplomatic source told The Telegraph that Paris was seeking to restrict member states looking to make a purchase under the scheme to weapons made mostly within the bloc.

The European Defence Industry Programme (EDIP) is being touted by the European Commission as the largest overhaul of the Continent’s industrial base.

It will see EU cash pumped into joint procurement projects and the production of weapons, ammunition and other military hardware.

EDIP, which has been six months in the making, is part of a wider scramble to spend €800 billion on defence by the end of the decade.

French diplomats have insisted the tool should be solely used to boost firms based inside the EU, as well as Norway and Ukraine.

This means any member states looking to make a purchase under the scheme will be restricted to technologies with at least 85 per cent of its parts made in the bloc.

The demand means that Britain, which recently signed a flagship defence and security agreement with Brussels, will be shut out from the majority of projects being funded by the EU’s budget.

The UK will also be blocked from joint procurement projects under the EDIP scheme.

“Not even a month ago, we solemnly declared the turning of pages and opening of new chapters in our relationship with the UK,” an EU diplomat told The Telegraph.

“Yet, at the first occasion to turn those words into action, we have slammed the book shut.”

There are also fears the hard-line French position will see potential EU funding cut from factories producing Patriot surface-to-air interceptors, because they are a US technology.

It comes at a time when Nato’s European allies and Canada were warned they would have to increase air defence systems by 400 per cent to protect against the prospect of a Russian attack.

“It seems self-defeating to exclude investments in the one readily available air defence system, simply because it’s American,” the diplomat added.

Emmanuel Macron, France’s president, has consistently pushed for EU defence schemes to be used to boost the Continent’s own industry, rather than allowing funds to be invested in foreign firms.

Bogged down in red tape​

Many militaries across the EU, such as the Netherlands, Romania and Greece, have built their defensive strategies around the procurement of American systems, like Patriot air defence batteries.

To mitigate concerns, there are discussions over allowing the transfer of technologies from non-EU defence firms to businesses based in the bloc.

But insiders have said this mechanism will likely become bogged down in red tape, making it practically impossible to secure funds for.

Macron is for Macron.
 
On the other hand, you might be able to get a deal on some M777s.


A new £25m howitzer factory in Sheffield will become the home of Britain’s defence manufacturing push as the country prepares for a weapons spending blitz.

On Thursday, the Government said the state-of-the-art site, run by BAE Systems, will become the hub of Britain’s defence manufacturing push after it opened this week to initially increase production of M777 towed howitzers.
 
Back
Top