• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Israeli strikes on Iran (2024, 2025, etc.)

There’s a high potential for IRGC acts of terrorism and assassination in the west. If the Iranian regime does not collapse following this, we can expect a lot of pretty bad stuff.
Not to mention Hezbollah & Co. - even if they've been thrashed a bit in Lebanon, I suspect there's more than zero assets (or supporters) to help out in the West in any such shenanigans.
 
Iran can't back down now. This was an Act of War. Fuck the Mullahs but this will be completely unproductive. No more monitoring and any Iranian nuclear production ongoing in unknown sites will be at overdrive. This only delayed a nuke. The only way to stop a nuke now is regime change and occupation. I've been reading analysts saying to expect proxy retaliation in Iraq and the potential mining of the Straits of Hormuz.
Better to deal with it now, than to let Iran fester forever, particularly with nukes.

Shipping lanes can be cleared, and terrorists can be sorted/stopped.
 
I think she is certainly influenced by Russia, but if the intelligence community writ large is saying that, I tend to believe it.
Are they saying that? What I have read is that Iran has been accelerating their enrichment programme, and showed no signs of slowing prior to the strikes from Israel...
 
Are they saying that? What I have read is that Iran has been accelerating their enrichment programme, and showed no signs of slowing prior to the strikes from Israel...
And likely weeks away from a bomb, and reports after Israeli strikes started they were trying to rush one
 
KAY BOOM!!!

What’s the BDA on this?
Watching different News channels from around the world and India Today is stating that the USAF dropped 6 MOP bombs on Fordow facility. Other news agencies are reporting 10 ballistic missile strikes throughout Israel.
 
Bring back the T-12 Cloudmaker.
T-12.jpg
 
June 9th, from the IAEA... Iran started this game, they just didn't know the game they were playing.

FAFO
CENTCOM as of this past Tuesday, via the White House ...
At that point, IIRC, Gabbard hadn't backtracked yet at that point.

Also, to be fair to her, as DNI, she should be sharing a sort of overall aggregate/consensus assessment from all the alphabet soup teams, "averaging" each agency's level of certainty/uncertainty. IF that's what was happening, that may have been the case at that point, with Defence maybe the more aggressive take on the int out there. 🤷‍♂️

After all, certainty can range - remember this from earlier this year? ;)
Here's the transcript via the Associated Press (text also attached if link doesn't work).

Meanwhile, a few details from the IAEA ....
... and bits from IRN state media (all archived links, none to IRN servers)
** - More on that missile system here (usual Wikipedia caveats):
*** - More on these guys here:
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Although a lot of stuff happened after ISW published its latest last night, this tidbit intrigues re: IRN sorting out who may be next (footnote links in the update) ....

"Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has begun implementing emergency succession measures in response to escalating Israeli strikes and the potential for US military involvement.[1] Unspecified Iranian sources told the New York Times on June 21 that Khamenei has relocated to a secure bunker, suspended digital communications, and now communicates with senior commanders only through a trusted aide.[2] Sources added that Khamenei named three senior clerics as candidates to replace him if he is killed.[3] Khamanei also reportedly named replacements for top military commanders and ordered senior officials to work from underground offices and avoid using cellphones.[4] These steps mark the first reported instance of Khamenei directly selecting potential successors outside the formal process of the Assembly of Experts. Khamenei likely took these steps amid heightened assassination fears, as some Israeli officials, including Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz, have openly threatened Khamenei’s life.[5] Two unspecified US officials told Reuters on June 15 that the US President Donald Trump vetoed an Israeli plan to kill Khamenei, however.[6] Trump separately stated on June 17 that the United States knows “exactly where the so-called ‘Supreme Leader’ is hiding” but would not “take him out, at least not for now.”[7]

Khamenei’s previous actions indicate that the three possible replacements are almost certainly equally as ideological as he is. Khamenei previously met with the Assembly of Experts members in November 2024 and emphasized that the next Supreme Leader must “embody the revolution” and implement Islam in Iranian society.[8] Khamenei did not name a successor at the meeting, however. Esfahan interim Friday Prayer Leader and Assembly of Experts member Abdolhasan Mahdavi confirmed a week after Khamenei’s meeting in November 2024 that the assembly had confidentially identified and prioritized three candidates for succession and framed it as “a routine responsibility.”[9] The Assembly of Experts is an 88-member elected clerical body tasked with appointing, supervising, and—at least in theory—removing the Supreme Leader, though in practice it has never challenged the position and plays a limited role in day-to-day politics.[10] The only previous leadership transition in Iran occurred in 1989 under different political conditions. The current assembly was elected in March 2024 and will serve until 2032.[11]

It remains unclear who Khamenei selected as his potential successor. Unspecified sources added that Mojtaba Khamenei, Khamenei’s son and frequently rumored successor, is not among the designated candidates, however.[12] Former President Ebrahim Raisi, another widely speculated figure, died in a helicopter crash in May 2024 and is no longer in consideration.[13] Khamenei’s decision reflects his concerns about external threats and potential instability after his death, as the regime expects opposition groups and anti-regime actors to exploit any leadership vacuum.[14] Opposition groups and anti-regime actors are more likely to try to exploit such a vacuum during a war ..."
 
Back
Top