• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

All Things First Nations - CF help, protests, solutions, residential schools, etc. (merged)

"Other non-party land holders will get their chance to be heard later" Good luck for a individual to challenge that case with no resources.
 
I know government must reconcile and meet agreements, but if private ownership begins to be affected, this is a whole new ball of wax.

Why buy when there is a risk that the rug can be pulled out from underneath of you?
 
I know government must reconcile and meet agreements, but if private ownership begins to be affected, this is a whole new ball of wax.

Why buy when there is a risk that the rug can be pulled out from underneath of you?
Worse yet, what corporation is going to invest in development (pipelines, resources etc.) when there is a chance that the local tribe will move in after you have done all the expensive stuff. Consider what happened in Caledonia and multiply it 100 fold. And yes, tribe is a little derogatory I suppose but many (not all by any means) of these nations were no more than extended family groups at the time of confederation.
 
Worse yet, what corporation is going to invest in development (pipelines, resources etc.) when there is a chance that the local tribe will move in after you have done all the expensive stuff. Consider what happened in Caledonia and multiply it 100 fold. And yes, tribe is a little derogatory I suppose but many (not all by any means) of these nations were no more than extended family groups at the time of confederation.
I like the fact that you were aware of that and went full steam ahead anyways.:LOL:
 
Worse yet, what corporation is going to invest in development (pipelines, resources etc.) when there is a chance that the local tribe will move in after you have done all the expensive stuff. Consider what happened in Caledonia and multiply it 100 fold. And yes, tribe is a little derogatory I suppose but many (not all by any means) of these nations were no more than extended family groups at the time of confederation.
Is it derogatory now? Find it interesting how this happens. The ones I knew including relatives used it when I was around in discussions with them. Visited the res and the group in the house I was visiting used it.
 
older history books certainly tell a different story. Books written say before 1950 had the indigenous groups asking for schooling, farm assistance, and other forms of training to escape the poverty associated with the tribes. Their lands were great if you were a hunter or trapper but they were sadly lacking in resources to develop a steady income and a future for the kids. It is accepted that there was abuse in the schools but then again St. Michaels in Toronto has had its share of scandals as well. Cultural genocide as they call it now was something totally different in 1880. Getting rid of the buckskins and putting on Levi's was every man's goal. Ask yourself how many of the indigenous (protect their culture, honour their tradition followers) get their squaws to make all their own clothing. Heck, how many would be alive tomorrow if they asked/told their wives to do so. Living in a Tepee may be fun for the weekend but not so great as a semi-permanent residence. It is time to stop trying to re-write history.
 
It seems FN invented horizontal stripes.
With respect, that's kinda like saying, "What? Like the Scots invented plaid?" when someone talks about their tartan and its importance to their heritage & history.
When everything is 'sacred' nothing is sacred.
To be fair, the article does say the skirt in question was gifted to the Premier. While leery about some media and political info-machines, barring other evidence, I'll take at face value that someone gifted the ribbon skirt to the Premier, who wore it visiting a FN.

Like all kinds of religious & cultural beliefs, while generally to be respected, some elements may be in the eye of the beholder. Some feel FAR more strongly about some parts of their culture than others - often depending on whether you agree with the politics (or institutional history) of the person in question who received some regalia in good faith from someone giving it in good faith.

All of these folks have had both fans and haters in response to gifted Indigenous regalia in Canada, for example ....
TrudeauHeadress.jpeg
HarperHeaddress.jpg
PopeHeaddress.jpg
NotleyHeaddress.jpg
DiefenbakerHeaddress.jpg
#RegaliaPoliticalRorschach
More here:
 
With respect, that's kinda like saying, "What? Like the Scots invented plaid?" when someone talks about their tartan and its importance to their heritage & history.

To be fair, the article does say the skirt in question was gifted to the Premier. While leery about some media and political info-machines, barring other evidence, I'll take at face value that someone gifted the ribbon skirt to the Premier, who wore it visiting a FN.

Like all kinds of religious & cultural beliefs, while generally to be respected, some elements may be in the eye of the beholder. Some feel FAR more strongly about some parts of their culture than others - often depending on whether you agree with the politics (or institutional history) of the person in question who received some regalia in good faith from someone giving it in good faith.

All of these folks have had both fans and haters in response to gifted Indigenous regalia in Canada, for example ....
View attachment 95347
View attachment 95348
View attachment 95349
View attachment 95350
View attachment 95351
#RegaliaPoliticalRorschach
More here:

Fine, but just don't let any of those wankers don a maroon beret ;)

c130 paratroopers GIF
 
Key in my mind are the following:
1) Clean water. Frankly I'd cut most foreign aid until all Canadians have acceptable water. Can't have healthy communities if folks can't drink water. It's both a moral and ethical decision as a Nation to address.
No one in Canada has guaranteed clean drinking water. That is paid for generally by your municipality by your taxes. If your rural you pay less taxes but are providing your own water through wells, etc.

Many of the native groups have been provided clean drinking water, they then fail to maintain facilities, let it go into disrepair, then complain about not having clean drinking water. This issue is a lot deeper than simply providing the means to purify water.

I am of the opinion with the exception of those areas polluted by company action, the government should have nothing to do with it. If the natives wish to be sovereign, be sovereign. Raise taxes. Spend band money on it. Pay to send people to be trained as operators. Actually work the job instead of abandoning it (huge part of the issue there).

Why should everyone else be held responsible for people who refuse to take care of themselves?

The ‘clean drinking water’ mantra sounds good on paper, the more you dig into it though the more you realize that it is much more than simply building a purification center.
 
No one in Canada has guaranteed clean drinking water. That is paid for generally by your municipality by your taxes. If your rural you pay less taxes but are providing your own water through wells, etc.
But municipalities aren't mentioned in this bit of the Constitution Act, either.
... it is hereby declared that (notwithstanding anything in this Act) the exclusive Legislative Authority of the Parliament of Canada extends to all Matters coming within the Classes of Subjects next hereinafter enumerated; that is to say ... Indians, and Lands reserved for the Indians ...
That said ....
... Many of the native groups have been provided clean drinking water, they then fail to maintain facilities, let it go into disrepair, then complain about not having clean drinking water. This issue is a lot deeper than simply providing the means to purify water ... The ‘clean drinking water’ mantra sounds good on paper, the more you dig into it though the more you realize that it is much more than simply building a purification center.
That. Right. There.

And if it was easy, and only needed money (of which a whole shit-load is already going into), it would have been solved.
 
With respect, that's kinda like saying, "What? Like the Scots invented plaid?" when someone talks about their tartan and its importance to their heritage & history.
As someone of a European descent I want those culturally appropriated ribbons returned. Or just pay me a consultation fee 🤑
 
Last edited:
No one in Canada has guaranteed clean drinking water. That is paid for generally by your municipality by your taxes. If your rural you pay less taxes but are providing your own water through wells, etc.

Many of the native groups have been provided clean drinking water, they then fail to maintain facilities, let it go into disrepair, then complain about not having clean drinking water. This issue is a lot deeper than simply providing the means to purify water.

I am of the opinion with the exception of those areas polluted by company action, the government should have nothing to do with it. If the natives wish to be sovereign, be sovereign. Raise taxes. Spend band money on it. Pay to send people to be trained as operators. Actually work the job instead of abandoning it (huge part of the issue there).

Why should everyone else be held responsible for people who refuse to take care of themselves?

The ‘clean drinking water’ mantra sounds good on paper, the more you dig into it though the more you realize that it is much more than simply building a purification center.
In most bands I met a small cohort who wanted to make life better, but the majority of the band just wanted to do the bare minimum and get stuff given to them. That made it very difficult to move ahead and generally the motivated ones were running the council or leaving. That is slowly changing, but at a frustrating pace.
I fully agree on your drinking water statements and developing the capacity inhouse.
 
In most bands I met a small cohort who wanted to make life better, but the majority of the band just wanted to do the bare minimum and get stuff given to them. That made it very difficult to move ahead and generally the motivated ones were running the council or leaving. That is slowly changing, but at a frustrating pace.
With differing ratios of both groups in different communities, each of which has different levels of access to outside investment and job opportunities. As much as I dislike the centre (wherever that may be) coming up with "bright ideas" for the periphery, I don't envy Ottawa trying to come up with a "one size fits at least most" solution to the various issues involved.
 
She was gifted the skirt. She wears the skirts to meetings with First Nations communities. It may shock some- but First Nations peoples have a variety of political views too- and just because one person, or several, in the FN community doesn’t like it- doesn’t mean it’s inappropriate. It means we re giving a platform to people who are weaponizing their culture when they think it’s advantageous. I’ve got lots of FN gifts that I could in theory have worn with my uniform. I don’t- but not everyone would have even happy to see me do it. Doesn’t change the intent of communities who gave me the gift.
 
Back
Top