• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

All Things First Nations - CF help, protests, solutions, residential schools, etc. (merged)

I think we need those 1,000new RCMP officers tout suite

Cannabis plants worth $200M seized in raids on Tyendinaga Mohawk Territory, police say​

34 suspects facing charges after illegal farms shut down in September, October​



Why? Not their turf.

It seems not everybody on the Territory is happy about it.

 
Why? Not their turf.

It seems not everybody on the Territory is happy about it.

Because maybe they are upset that so much profit is being taken out from the territory and so many people have been exposed and arrested.
I am 100% behind exposing the crimes that are committed there, anywhere, and bringing all to justice.
 
Because maybe they are upset that so much profit is being taken out from the territory and so many people have been exposed and arrested.
I am 100% behind exposing the crimes that are committed there, anywhere, and bringing all to justice.
100% there are legal ways they could go about this but they didnt, so throw the book at them
 
Why? Not their turf.

It seems not everybody on the Territory is happy about it.

That's a crappy article. An injunction is a court order. An interlocutory injunction is a temporary court order.

This appears to be neither. It's an application for a hearing in order to obtain an interlocutory injunction. It's not a done deal yet.

🍻
 
So, in the wake of the Cowichan decision, and with the Haldimand Tract case coming to trial in 2026, I got thinking about the potential for precedent and unintended consequences given it's unique origins.

For those that don't know- the Haldimand Tract was granted to Brant and the Haudenosonee / Iroquois in 1793, granting ~950k acres, 10km on either side of the Grand River from Lake Erie to Dundalk. Over time this was whittled down, Crown alleges legal sales and surrenders, Band alleges shenanigans. Unlike the Cowichan, the 6 Nations aren't trying to assert titled they just (in the order of like a trillion dollars) want paid.

I'm not a lawyer but...

To me though the interesting bit isn't whether they're right or not in their claim- it's that their claim is fundamentally underpinned by the Crown granting them land in the first place.

There is no question about it- Brant and the Iroquois were not native to Canada, the Haldimand Tract is not their ancestral territory since time immemorial. They're foreigners that were granted land by the crown in exchange for their support in the Revolutionary War. So the question isn't about inherent Aboriginal Title- the British crown granted land to a foreign nation. If it is found that the Crown breached obligations pursuant to that proclamation, it stands to reason that its finding that the proclamation legitimately granted the land to the band in the first place, which necessitates the finding that the land was the crown's to give away.... which fully and wholly legitimizes the purchase of that land from the Mississauga in 1792. Cynically, it reinforces the reality that the treaty paradigm being levered to pull money out of the government requires fully embracing the idea of a transactional relationship between nations, which is in direct contradiction to the wishy washy pull on the heartstrings ancestral land / since time immemorial angle.
 
Interesting right enough.

Brant's indigenous Iriquoian American natives were refugees and colonial settlers that recognized the authority of the Crown over land also inhabited by Iriquoian Huron and Anishinaabe Mississauga.

More than a cup of coffee to sort that one out.
 
Interesting right enough.

Brant's indigenous Iriquoian American natives were refugees and colonial settlers that recognized the authority of the Crown over land also inhabited by Iriquoian Huron and Anishinaabe Mississauga.

More than a cup of coffee to sort that one out.
Where is the Huron confederacy today? Unfortunately many First Nation claims are also dependent upon which time period we use to measure against.
 
Where is the Huron confederacy today? Unfortunately many First Nation claims are also dependent upon which time period we use to measure against.
They were pretty well wiped out by the Mohawk and Iroquois Confederacy, who killed, took them as slaves or assimilated them into Mohawk bands, while pillaging their land and resources.
 
Interesting right enough.

Brant's indigenous Iriquoian American natives were refugees and colonial settlers that recognized the authority of the Crown over land also inhabited by Iriquoian Huron and Anishinaabe Mississauga.

More than a cup of coffee to sort that one out.
Then add the layer that they were refugees and colonial settlers... whose ancestors wiped out the actual ancestral indigenous nation the Neutral Confederacy ~120 years prior in the Beaver Wars
 
Then add the layer that they were refugees and colonial settlers... whose ancestors wiped out the actual ancestral indigenous nation the Neutral Confederacy ~120 years prior in the Beaver Wars

Who, like Brant's people and the Huron spoke an Iroquoian tongue unrelated to the Algonkian languages of the Anishinaabe Ojibway and the Cree that were there before the Iroquoians showed up with their corn and their forts....

After the Inuit and Vikings met up in Newfoundland.

....

I love history.
 
They were pretty well wiped out by the Mohawk and Iroquois Confederacy, who killed, took them as slaves or assimilated them into Mohawk bands, while pillaging their land and resources.
100% understood that part.

I use them often a case study when talking with peers and others about the complexity of First Nation history and trying to define things cleanly.
The French-Huron alliance vs. the British-Iroquois battles of history and yet who is original owners of the land today?

It's like trying to say the borders of Europe today are the exact same over history and that no invasions/mergers/purges or other dastardly events occurred in years past.
 
100% understood that part.

I use them often a case study when talking with peers and others about the complexity of First Nation history and trying to define things cleanly.
The French-Huron alliance vs. the British-Iroquois battles of history and yet who is original owners of the land today?

It's like trying to say the borders of Europe today are the exact same over history and that no invasions/mergers/purges or other dastardly events occurred in years past.

My time in Peterborough introduced me to the Hiawatha Ojibway, Mississauga Anishinaabe. They arrived on Rice Lake in the 1600s. The Anishinaabe are part of the Algonquian peoples that originated in the Eastern Woodlands of the US and trace their lineage back, legitimately, to at least 3100 BC based on archaeological evidence. The Anishinaabe began their migration up the St Lawrence from the Gaspesie somewhere about 700 AD.

The Iroquois didn't show up until somewhere about 1100 AD. Coincidental with the Mediaeval Warm and desertification in the Arizona area.
 
There's a brew ha ha a brewin'


Leader of upstart provincial party visits Kamloops, calls for end to Aboriginal title rights​


The controversial leader of an upstart right-wing political party is looking to make inroads in Kamloops, with plans to fight Aboriginal title rights in the B.C. Legislature as cases play out in court.

Vancouver-Quilchena MLA Dallas Brodie, leader of the OneBC Party, spoke to about 60 people Thursday standing on a cul de sac in the 1800-block of Rogers Place.

The event was billed as a meet and greet at which the issue of Aboriginal title would be a topic of discussion.

Brodie laid out numerous actions her party would take in this area if it formed government, adding her intent is to help the Indigenous people, and target those in positions of power who she claims are exploiting the current system.


 
There's a brew ha ha a brewin'


Leader of upstart provincial party visits Kamloops, calls for end to Aboriginal title rights​


The controversial leader of an upstart right-wing political party is looking to make inroads in Kamloops, with plans to fight Aboriginal title rights in the B.C. Legislature as cases play out in court.

Vancouver-Quilchena MLA Dallas Brodie, leader of the OneBC Party, spoke to about 60 people Thursday standing on a cul de sac in the 1800-block of Rogers Place.

The event was billed as a meet and greet at which the issue of Aboriginal title would be a topic of discussion.

Brodie laid out numerous actions her party would take in this area if it formed government, adding her intent is to help the Indigenous people, and target those in positions of power who she claims are exploiting the current system.



It's interesting that it's two women who started that righter than right party...
 
Back
Top