• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Political impacts of Ukraine war

As part of Carney's trip to Ukraine/Poland/Germany/Latvia:

Though not specifically called out as part of Carney's talks with Poland today, other than to say 'expand trade with Poland', I did find this 4 days old article out of Poland and nuclear energy and the mention of Canada interesting.

 
As part of Carney's trip to Ukraine/Poland/Germany/Latvia:

Though not specifically called out as part of Carney's talks with Poland today, other than to say 'expand trade with Poland', I did find this 4 days old article out of Poland and nuclear energy and the mention of Canada interesting.


Possibly a "we buy your subs, you drop your bid in Poland" type deal?
 
I wonder which CDN bank moved that gold to Portugal….
Well, the Bank of Canada got someone to absolve THEM in 1997, so ....
 
Possibly a "we buy your subs, you drop your bid in Poland" type deal?
I don't think so, according to the article the SK's have to pay a 'fee' to Westinghouse for using their technology in SK nuclear reactors, coupled with the 'requirement' for the US Gov't to sign off on the SK sale to foreign countries for using this technology and then finally that extra 'fee' to Westhinghouse makes the SK's price uncompetitive.
 
Times sure have changed. Remember when the Russian's were mocking Europe saying it would freeze in the winter (cutting off Russian gas), early on in the war?

 
MOAR reassurances from the Veep!
From the piece:
RUSSIA has abandoned its ambitions to control Ukraine after the war, according to JD Vance - who counts it as a key concession win.
Let's see how well THIS one ages - archived here for posterity :)

Meanwhile, from Team USSR 2.0 ...
 
Nice of Russia to give the U.S. tentative permission to offer military defense assurances to U.S. allies.
Yeah, about that ...
... with this response from UKR's Prez (links to archived Financial Post article)
1756352432385.png
That 2022 agreement would be the Istanbul Communique (see attached PDF - source: NY Times), which failed, in part because USSR 2.0 wanted any activation of security guarantee to have to have unanimous approval of all the parties, including Russia. UKR didn't like it then, either ...

🍿
 

Attachments

Another piece of USSR inheritance is about to turn to dust.



No bankruptcies allowed if your business is agriculture. Might start happening in other sectors in the coming months, a very good sign. Be interesting to see how much farmland just sits unused next year if lenders now know for a fact they won't get paid back at all if the recipient is a farmer.

Which is interesting as Russia became the No 1 grain exporter in the world just before 2022.
 
Well that should erase any doubt that may have still existed regarding Orban, man is 100% a Russian asset.


You can already find coalitions within NATO . Some willing. Some not. Some independently minded.

Getting all of NATO to act only became harder with expansion. Starting with the addition of Spain and Portugal in the 80s and the French deciding to re-up in 2009.
 
A bit of insight (via x.com) into some of Hungary's ... issues with Ukraine - and how Poland's deputy PM responded :)
1756579760175.png
A bit from UKR & European MSM on this one here
 
Back
Top