• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

CH-148 Cyclone Progress

The Triton/Global Hawk family doesn’t employ dropped stores. The SeaGuardian version of the MQ-9, however, shows promise. It has long endurance, can carry an impressive amount of sonobouys, and acts as a rebroadcaster for sonobouy data. I don’t think anyone’s dropped a torpedo yet from a Reaper variant, but that capability might be coming soon.
Not if reaper doesn’t have a heated, internal weapons bay, will they carry and drop torpedos.
 
The Triton/Global Hawk family doesn’t employ dropped stores. The SeaGuardian version of the MQ-9, however, shows promise. It has long endurance, can carry an impressive amount of sonobouys, and acts as a rebroadcaster for sonobouy data. I don’t think anyone’s dropped a torpedo yet from a Reaper variant, but that capability might be coming soon.
Thanks, that was a misspeak on my part.
 
So… (full disclaimer, I’ve not heard anybody say this):

Over in the F-35 thread there is speculation about a Lock-Mart / GOC announcement on 22 Sep. Given LM owns Sik, anybody want to create Cyclone rumours?
 
What’s the range hit if they stay at a low enough altitude?
According to wiki, the Reaper weighs 4,901 lbs, has a max take off weight of 10,494 lbs, and can carry 4000 lbs of fuel, leaving 1594 lbs for payload if it is carrying max fuel (wiki also says it can carry up to 3800 lbs of payload, which would leave it with only 1793 lbs of fuel.)

A Mk-46 weight about 500lbs, so in theory it could carry two of them and still carry a full fuel load.
 
According to wiki, the Reaper weighs 4,901 lbs, has a max take off weight of 10,494 lbs, and can carry 4000 lbs of fuel, leaving 1594 lbs for payload if it is carrying max fuel (wiki also says it can carry up to 3800 lbs of payload, which would leave it with only 1793 lbs of fuel.)

A Mk-46 weight about 500lbs, so in theory it could carry two of them and still carry a full fuel load.
OK. But the concern SKT raised was internal storage and heaing for the weapon. So, the question is, how badly is the range affected if you carry the weapon externally and fly at a lower altitude?
 
The only question is: what does work?

Corollary: how many do I need to ensure I have one working when I need it?
Depends what you want to do with it and where.
Certain operational environments are tougher on equipment than others, so you would want to have more airframes to ensure X are available.
 
Depends what you want to do with it and where.
Certain operational environments are tougher on equipment than others, so you would want to have more airframes to ensure X are available.

Agreed. Have you talked about that to any accountants recently?

I love explaining that you can still make money with 10% efficient systems.
 
Misery loves company:

We are not alone.


....


The only question is: what does work?

Corollary: how many do I need to ensure I have one working when I need it?

AW101 Merlin.
the Norwegians run 101s for SAR which our upgrade is to be based on
they have also replaced the NH90 with MH-60s
but are buying the type 26
 
Back
Top