- Reaction score
- 4,829
- Points
- 1,260
LolAccording to MAGA, who are losing their sheisse?
To train more Muslims to fly aircraft on US soil because that worked out so well last time...
It’s called ‘pre-positioning your equipment.’
LolAccording to MAGA, who are losing their sheisse?
To train more Muslims to fly aircraft on US soil because that worked out so well last time...
Deploying your military in your own cities and having your cabinet and federal agents treat your Constitution like toilet paper is detrimental to a Nobel nomination?Trump is not happy about being passed over for the Nobel Peace Prize.
A follow-up to my question above. Very long article on how much influence the Qatari's have in the United States:Why would the Qatari AF need an Facility in Idaho?
- Overall, we rate The Free Press as Right-Center biased due to its consistent criticism of left-leaning views, especially on cultural and social issues. We rate them Mixed for factual reporting because, while articles are generally well-sourced, the outlet often presents one-sided opinion pieces that lack counterarguments or broader contextual balance.
Deploying your military in your own cities and having your cabinet and federal agents treat your Constitution like toilet paper is detrimental to a Nobel nomination?
Who knew.
Why would the Brits need a facility in Suffield, or the Germans one in Shilo (when they had such things)?Why would the Qatari AF need an Facility in Idaho?
The timing is suspect too. Hamas in Gaza has agreed to free prisoners and Qatar is big supporter of Hamas. Is ICE Barbie going to permit those foreigners on American soil? Is ICE Barbie also on Qatari payroll?Why would the Qatari AF need a Facility in Idaho?
Closer ties and military cooperation between nations in that region and the US were unexceptional from approximately 2 Aug 1990 to 20 Jan 2025.Why would the Brits need a facility in Suffield, or the Germans one in Shilo (when they had such things)?
Then again, the look was quite different then, given UK or Germany didn't gift Canada a nice plane (and who knows what else) beforehand, either ....
You’re being disingenuous. A middle eastern country being permitted to establish a base presence in the U.S. would have been remarkable and contentious in any of those years as well, even if it didn’t come hot on the heels of that country gifting the U.S. president a 747.Closer ties and military cooperation between nations in that region and the US were unexceptional from approximately 2 Aug 1990 to 20 Jan 2025.
Why would the Brits need a facility in Suffield, or the Germans one in Shilo (when they had such things)?
Then again, the look was quite different then, given UK or Germany didn't gift Canada a nice plane (and who knows what else) beforehand, either ....
He ran has a Republican because that was the party he was more likely to win the primary.If Trump wanted a Nobel, he should have run as a Democrat.
Sarcasm. See Obama, Prize, Nobel. He talked his way into an "award" for which most people have to produce a significant concrete single achievement or a lifetime of work.He ran has a Republican because that was the party he was more likely to win the primary.
For all the folks who keep endlessly defending Trump, would you wear this watch? The hypocrisy would be so funny it will be worth it, going around "owning the Libs" with a total turd made in China watch, sold directly by the patriotic make it in America president. Nothing weird about it! Totally normal dudes wear and support this stuff without seeing any hypocrisy!