• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The RCAF's Next Generation Fighter (CF-188 Replacement)

Good for Saab and us if we decide to order/buy the jet however, I'm not sure at the end of the day there is too much value in a full tech transfer for a jet design that was originally produced in the late 1980's and has seen infamous market failings over the past decade. It's very much attaching yourself to yesterdays product, when it wasn't even a particularly hot success back then.
However this is the Gripen E/F we are talking here, which is what the super hornet was the original F18. Slightly different beast, bigger and badder, and more modern.
If anything, we should be putting F-35A's into Europe to cover the Latvia Brigade given how many more F-35's are operated by NATO in the area and how much more effective it is to go up against Russia with 5th gen aircraft vs a Gripen E.
Might as well go full high low concept then, F35 provides first strike, gripen is your bomb truck
 
This one is debatable to me. Full tech transfer doesn't mean much unless the supply chain is substantially developed in Canada. But then how is that profitable for Saab? They never talk about Canadian content and supply chains. Just assembly and vague assertions to R&D.

Sweden has other companies operating profitably in Canada for many decades. A lot of them you won't have heard of unless you are involved in specfic industries. Ballbearings, heat exchangers, pumps, valves, centrifuges, alloys, PLCs and other electronics....

Here is a list of some Swedish companies operating in Canada:

Alfa Laval: A company specializing in heat transfer, separation, and fluid handling.
Atlas Copco: A multinational company known for its industrial productivity solutions.
Ericsson: A multinational company in the telecommunications sector.
H&M Hennes & Mauritz: A multinational clothing-retail company known for its fashion apparel.
IKEA: A multinational conglomerate that designs and sells ready-to-assemble furniture, kitchen appliances, and home accessories.
Sandvik: A Swedish multinational engineering company specializing in mining and rock excavation, metal-cutting tools, and materials technology.
SKF: A company that manufactures and supplies ball bearings, seals, and lubrication systems.
Stora Enso: A leading provider of renewable solutions in packaging, biomaterials, wood construction, and paper.
Tetra-Pak: A company that designs and manufactures a wide range of packaging for food and beverage products.
Volvo Trucks: A manufacturer of heavy-duty trucks.

Husqvarna, Forsberg.

Just watch out for their market support, overhead and real estate fees. They will happily build us a new factory then lease it back to us.
 
Understand the frustration.
Circling back to the question on the E7, what is everyone else buying?

Regarding the F35, would buying 65 ruffle fewer feathers? It is the original number that was proposed.
As for the Gripens, Snowbird replacements and planes for NATO deployments.

Don't forget there is still the Golden Dome card in play. Along with icebreakers, arctic troops, security in general, energy, critical minerals...This game of monopoly has just started.
 
We will fuck this up and the damage will be near impossible to un fuck.

That's how much faith I have in the GoC and its "commitments" to defense.
 
The RCAF could get their TAPV.
The RCAF soon:
dont-you-put-that-evil-on-me-michael-clarke.gif
 
Don't forget there is still the Golden Dome card in play. Along with icebreakers, arctic troops, security in general, energy, critical minerals...This game of monopoly has just started.
The Great Game has re-started, I just don’t want us to lay the role of Afghanistan.
 
Back
Top