• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

US Army: Transforming in Contact and Army 2030

FJAG

Army.ca Legend
Subscriber
Reaction score
18,933
Points
1,160
We don't seem to have a unified thread on discussions about the ongoing US Army transformation initiatives. Here's how they describe that.

Transforming in Contact is the Army's adaptation of its organizations and delivery of new technology into the hands of Soldiers so that they can experiment, innovate, and be ready to fight on a modern battlefield. It accelerates the fielding of necessary capabilities and leverages commercial-off-the-shelf products to get new capabilities to the force fast. Soldiers can organize and integrate the capabilities during realistic training scenarios, adapting their formations to fit the need and making technology work for them rather than working for the technology. This informs how we fight and how we organize in the future.

To start us off is this recent article about the army to shift a large portion of its attack helicopter fleet of AH64Es from the active army to the ARNG as well as other adjustments to their aviation fleet.


đŸ»
 
Autonomous launchers in three sizes. Based on one common pod that can carry various missiles.



1760800751074.jpeg
 
Back to the Mobile Brigade Combat Team and the correct use of the ISV.

Short form - not for advance to contact, recce leads.


Major problem - the need for a lightweight CUAS solution....

See the GBAD thread for the offered solutions to that problem.

Honeywell touted a pickup truck that could take out drones while moving at highway speeds.
 
Actually my comment about the advance to contact is overly glib and wrong.

The mounted advance to contact will end when recce drones make contact. The dismounted advance will continue.

And problems will ensue when the enemy learns how to defeat the drone screen by camouflage, deception, EW and CUAS.

Ambushes and meeting engagements will still happen.
 

Interesting, US Army stood down three Service Component Commands, FORSCOM, USASOUTHCOM, and USANORTHCOM that belonged to the US Army, US Southern Command, and US Northern Command respectively and created a USA Western Hemisphere Command in its place. A single four star hat for operations in the Americas. FORSCOM was essentially the "Army Force Generator" that owned I Corps, III Corps, and XVIII Airborne Corps and their respective divisions for allocation to COCOMs for operations.

This likely ties to the "Trump Corollary of the Munroe Doctrine" that the recently released US National Defense Strategy references in providing a single ground force employer for the US' new top priority, hemispheric defence.

Also interesting are the details, which highlight where the Corps (and most of the US Army's combat power) will be assigned. I Corps (7 ID, 25 ID, 11 Abn) will move to USARPAC under INDOPACOM while III Corps (1 Cav, 1 AD, 1 ID) will move to USAREUR-AF under EUCOM/AFRICOM. 4 ID will shift from III Corps to I Corps. XVIII Airborne Corps (82 Abn, 101 AA, 10 Mtn, 3 ID) will be assigned to USAWHC.

Although forces will be allocated to COCOMs as required, the Army has basically split its forces into three, and now has forces assigned to COCOMs on a permanent basis for operations.
 

Soldiers of the 173rd Airborne Brigade on Thursday deactivated its 1st Squadron, 91st Cavalry Regiment, and replaced it with the reactivated 3rd Battalion, 504th Parachute Infantry Regiment, during a ceremony at Tower Barracks

“This gives us a lot more tactical flexibility,” battalion commander Lt. Col. Austin Commons said afterward. “We can move around the battlefield a lot more quickly. It’s reducing soldier fatigue by getting them into light vehicles, but then our mission, our purpose, doesn’t really change.”

....

“A paratrooper in this formation today is just as likely to kill an enemy by flying an explosive drone into their position than by shooting them with a rifle,”

...

"Fourteen active-duty and 20 National Guard infantry brigade combat teams will make the switch to the more mobile units over the next two years, the Congressional Research Service said in a report on Dec. 9. The new teams will see their force reduced by 2,600 soldiers to a total of 1,900 apiece.

"Individual infantry battalion assault companies will be replaced by multipurpose companies consisting of the battalion’s mortar and scout platoons. Another impending change is the creation of a unit called an “effects platoon,” which will operate counter-drone systems and the battalion’s primary loitering munitions, the report said."
 
So, from the above

The Multi-Purpose Companies, known to us as Combat Support Companies, in the ISV equipped brigades, are likely to incorporate these:

a 7.62mm Skyranger RCWS


1768071786769.jpeg

and an 81m mortar vehicle

1768071929253.jpeg


Personally I would go with the 30mm M230LF rather than the 7.62mm although a pair of M134s are cool as well.
 
Back
Top