• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Pipelines, energy and natural resources

  • Thread starter Thread starter QV
  • Start date Start date
Amen to that! The laws of supply and demand rule supreme in all commodity industries...
The cornerstone of all that is pricing. One of the great problems to be solved is figuring out where stuff has to go to make more stuff. How can timely information possibly be created and received and acted upon? That insufficiency of information is why command economies fail.

Answer: prices.
 
Federal negotiators "must recognize that if they are unsuccessful" in addressing U.S. duties and tariffs on timber, B.C. will need help, says B.C. Forests Minister Ravi Parmar.
You wait for a loooong time for something to come along that move governments to do things you've thought they should do. Then a crisis arrives. Some governments start doing some of the things, but also put a lot of energy into pressing other governments to act first. Obviously there is not enough external pressure.

Let the crisis go on.
 
Begging for federal welfare - anything but lifting business killing BC regulatory requirements...

Minister says B.C. expects billions from feds for forestry if U.S. talks fail​

Federal negotiators "must recognize that if they are unsuccessful" in addressing U.S. duties and tariffs on timber, B.C. will need help, says B.C. Forests Minister Ravi Parmar.


Sounds like an avenue for a deal to be made. That money could be tied to revenues made from a pipeline to the coast.
 
The cornerstone of all that is pricing. One of the great problems to be solved is figuring out where stuff has to go to make more stuff. How can timely information possibly be created and received and acted upon? That insufficiency of information is why command economies fail.

Answer: prices.

Prices are difficult to plan but easy to change.

Planners insist in sticking to their plans even in the face of failure.

Retail businesses have to adjust their prices on a daily basis according to what the market will bear.

Ultimately every business venture is an experiment. The only reliable means of managing risk is through scaling. Start small and work up.

You have to suck it and see.
 
Prices are difficult to plan but easy to change.

Planners insist in sticking to their plans even in the face of failure.

Retail businesses have to adjust their prices on a daily basis according to what the market will bear.

Ultimately every business venture is an experiment. The only reliable means of managing risk is through scaling. Start small and work up.

You have to suck it and see.
What does that have to do with the information conveyed by prices?
 
What does that have to do with the information conveyed by prices?

Prices change day by day.

Projects are planned years in advance based on anticipated prices.
As the project approaches IOC the price acceptable to the market may or may not be the price, or hopefully the price range, anticipated when the project planning commenced.

At that point decisions need to be made.
Accept the loss and shut down the project.
Hope for better days and plow on .
Hand the project off to another fallguy.
Figure out Plan B with what you have on hand.
 
Prices change day by day.

Projects are planned years in advance based on anticipated prices.
As the project approaches IOC the price acceptable to the market may or may not be the price, or hopefully the price range, anticipated when the project planning commenced.

At that point decisions need to be made.
Accept the loss and shut down the project.
Hope for better days and plow on .
Hand the project off to another fallguy.
Figure out Plan B with what you have on hand.

Time for a quote:

"The only function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectable"

John Kenneth Galbraith
 
Time for a quote:

"The only function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectable"

John Kenneth Galbraith

20 odd years ago I was asked to prepare a feasibiity study on a plant that the client didn't want to invest in. The local, state and federal governments were forcing the issue. They were convinced there was enough money in the waste that the client could afford to build the plant and clean up the harbour.

I checked the sums for a high cost plant producing a high priced product that would require a lot of marketing and a low cost plant producing a low cost product that would sell easily. Neither solution produced a feasible, profitable business. But there was one solution that might have made economic sense. But 95% of my operating envelope was underwater.

One of the key drivers in this drying plant was the price of fuel. If the price of fuel was within bounds then there was a 5% chance that the plant might break even someday. I recommended that the only way that plant could breakeven was with fees for disposal from the local processors and/or operating subsidies and capital grants from the governments.

The project did not proceed.

...

I can remember chasing fuel suppliers and wondering if the 1 USD per gallon current price was a useful planning baseline or should I allow for the outrageous supposition that it might reach 2 USD per gallon over the life of the plant.

I have worked with plants built in the 80s that are still in service today, 40 years later.

I just checked the price of marine diesel at that site - 3.82 USD per gallon.
 
Carney teasing something to come?


Oh My George Takai GIF
 
Sounds like an avenue for a deal to be made. That money could be tied to revenues made from a pipeline to the coast.
Eby is an absolute enemy of common sense, and doesn't seem to be able to differentiate between the 'worst possible case scenario' and the cancelation of provincially imposed red tape that constrains true economic growth

He seems to think that if he loosens up on policy, all of BC is going going to turn into a raging inferno overnight (magnified many times by that darn pipeline Alberta wanted to build...even though there are already pipelines & he isn't on fire)



I like the way you think though. There's definitely ways to do it IF the stakeholders really want to do it.

The problem is the Eby government in BC has expressly and clearly stated they don't have any real interest in being one of those stakeholders. (Even though LNG seems to benefitting the province just fine)


Carney teasing something to come?

Seems like he's desperately trying to play catch up, now that Trump & Smith negotiated something instead?
 
Back
Top