What you also could be observing is a blowhard narcissist end running every rule and procedure in the books to remake public property then bragging that it is the greatest, bestest thing that no other president had the courage to do, only have it unravel. Washington is a popular tourist destination. I suspect it would stoke public curiosity and be newsworthy if it turned into a swamp with or without new paint.
Everything Trump touches is that way. His bluster is a distraction not worth paying any attention to.
You seem to becoming quite the apologist.
I just leave the area whenever he comes on TV; I don't read transcripts of anything he says except when I (rarely) want to confirm whether the way people are spinning some inflammatory statement is correct in context or not (eg. "fine people"). Nothing he has to say is useful or interesting or durable, and it just unhinges others present and makes them unpleasant to be around. I take political corruption and cronyism ("beak-wetting") and double standards for granted (in all politics). I measure his administration by its policies and compare it to the alternatives. I'm probably the moderate in any room.
Here is the heart of the position: right now, in America, any kind of Republican control on offer is preferable to any kind of Democratic control on offer. The bluster and corruption have been weighed, and found inconsequential in balance with what the true alternative is.
Would you be ok with our PM, of any stripe, playing fast a loose with our public Ottawa spaces? Unilaterally hiring a buddy contractor to tear down 24 Sussex?
For 24 Sussex, and a lot of the blight problems facing communities, probably. A template is this: something needs to be done; a need has existed for years (maybe decades); nothing has been done; so, "the system" can't or won't do it. I reject the premise that "the system" may be a permanent obstacle; so, I'd entertain alternative processes.
I don't know the details or timelines of the reflecting pool fiasco. If they simply painted it then filled it, what did anyone expect?
They attempted to seal it. That's not an impossible job, but it can be done imperfectly. (I'd laugh if I learned they used the same blue goo that I once used to prepare a bathroom floor.) If it was done imperfectly, it merits criticism. An early return of algae in late spring/early summer does not merit an immediate Nelson Muntz Moment, though. And now there's a tug-of-war between activists who want the algae to return and stay as a rebuke to Trump, and those who would rather see it gone but use it's current presence as a rebuke to Trump.
The reasonable points of criticism have, again, been lost in the circus. And I'm through with the circuses.