• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trump administration 2024-2028

lenaitch said:
It will be interesting to see how the hardcore rapid MAGA folks try to spin this.
Click to expand...

Perhaps they can take a measure of comfort in the fact that six of the current nine U.S. Supreme Court justices were appointed by Republican presidents.

Especially considering 2024 is the first time a Republican candidate won the popular vote since George W. Bush in 2004.

To find the next instance of a Republican winning the popular vote, you’d have to go back another 16 years to when Bush’s father, George H. W. Bush, won the 1988 election .
 
Altair said:
Nice of him to hand off serious negotiations to his successor.
Click to expand...

Watched a podcast featuring Mexican media reporting it is Canada not participating in CUSMA prep meetings and being generally absent in this.

We are not getting the full truth from Canadian media.
 
Halifax Tar said:
Interesting development...

https://twitter.com/x/status/2072022399726358608
Click to expand...
Not really, this is pretty much exactly as expected. The agreement stays in effect, perpetual annual consultations ensue til 2036, and at any point til then we can all agree to renew. The agreement doesn’t cease to be of force or effect due to this. Trump could still dance with Congress if he wants to try to invoke the six month withdrawal notice. He doesn’t have the cards to pull that off. This is exactly what ragging the puck has meant, and I think all serious observers expected this to be the path.

Non-paywall Globe article:
 
QV said:
Watched a podcast featuring Mexican media reporting it is Canada not participating in CUSMA prep meetings and being generally absent in this.

We are not getting the full truth from Canadian media.
Click to expand...
Doesn't really matter.
 
QV said:
Watched a podcast featuring Mexican media reporting it is Canada not participating in CUSMA prep meetings and being generally absent in this.

We are not getting the full truth from Canadian media.
Click to expand...
No, the US is having bilateral meetings with Mexico to try to undermine the tripartite treaty. Divide and conquer, so to speak.
 
QV said:
Watched a podcast featuring Mexican media reporting it is Canada not participating in CUSMA prep meetings and being generally absent in this.

We are not getting the full truth from Canadian media.
Click to expand...
We have the deal well past Trump unless Congress invokes the 6 month release. We're pretty safe. Also - whats your source?
 
QV said:
Watched a podcast featuring Mexican media reporting it is Canada not participating in CUSMA prep meetings and being generally absent in this.

We are not getting the full truth from Canadian media.
Click to expand...
No, the US is having bilateral meetings with Mexico to try to undermine the tripartite treaty. Divide and conquer, so to speak.
 
dapaterson said:
No, the US is having bilateral meetings with Mexico to try to undermine the tripartite treaty. Divide and conquer, so to speak.
Click to expand...
Thats our weak point in all this. Mexico probably has even more to lose from CUSMA collapsing than we do. It would not be surprising to me at all that they throw us under the bus, they certainly can be duplicitious. That whole bit about nations and interests.
 
brihard said:
Not really, this is pretty much exactly as expected. The agreement stays in effect, perpetual annual consultations ensue til 2036, and at any point til then we can all agree to renew. The agreement doesn’t cease to be of force or effect due to this. Trump could still dance with Congress if he wants to try to invoke the six month withdrawal notice. He doesn’t have the cards to pull that off. This is exactly what ragging the puck has meant, and I think all serious observers expected this to be the path.

Non-paywall Globe article:
Click to expand...

Sounds interesting to me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top