• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trump administration 2024-2028

The net worth isn't debatable if it's right there in disclosures.

The questions centre on who is managing it.
 
PrairieFella said:
The graft and corruption is both monumental and undeniable.
Click to expand...
The appearance of impropriety is monumental and undeniable.

A family or closely controlled enterprise/foundation dealing in large sums, and particularly one accepting large sums from foreigners, warrants investigation. (A long-recognized pathway for bribery.) Someone should investigate. Certainly no-one has hesitated to investigate before. Yes, I laughed as I typed that last sentence, but there always has to be a first step, so it might as well be now irrespective of what has gone before; converts to a cause are always welcome. It would at least flip the future excuses from "your guy did it too" to "our guy was investigated, so yours should be too".
 
PrairieFella said:
What an odd nitpick. Dont believe your lying eyes vibes.
Click to expand...
Give it a rest. Nothing has been "proven" yet. Remember the Biden family? No-one could even get to "proven", because lack of "proof" was proposed by any number of fart-catchers as an excuse for not opening investigations. "Oh, you can't investigate them. You have no PROOF!" rhetoric was all over the place.

And this board was filled with page after page of solemn comments that whatever the Biden family business looked like, no bribery/corruption was proven - a simple statement of fact. If that was someone's standard then, it should be his standard now.

If a customary indicator for potential bribery exists, investigate. Unusual money flows into a politician's extended family and controlled assets are a customary indicator. I'm saying, "investigate". If warranted, seek indictments and press charges. Trump's gang looks dirty; Biden's gang looked dirty; I believe them all to be dirty; innocent until proven guilty remains.
 
Brad Sallows said:
The net worth isn't debatable if it's right there in disclosures.

The questions centre on who is managing it.
Click to expand...
So who is managing it?
He says Eric is, but what does that mean actually?
As I pointed out in here previously, the amount of transactions that he disclosed points to ‘someone’ day trading to the tune of over 50 trades a day. That’s not investing, that’s day trading. So, going back to Eric managing his money, is Eric sitting behind a desk from 9:30-4 every day buying and selling 50 times for his Dad?
 
Czech_pivo said:
So who is managing it?
He says Eric is, but what does that mean actually?
As I pointed out in here previously, the amount of transactions that he disclosed points to ‘someone’ day trading to the tune of over 50 trades a day. That’s not investing, that’s day trading. So, going back to Eric managing his money, is Eric sitting behind a desk from 9:30-4 every day buying and selling 50 times for his Dad?
Click to expand...
Those are questions that could be answered by an investigation, surely?

Given the right conditions, a set of limit orders could generate a lot of trades. All you'd need are a "buy" and "sell" order close together and a jittery stock price ranging between the two.
 
Brad Sallows said:
Those are questions that could be answered by an investigation, surely?

Given the right conditions, a set of limit orders could generate a lot of trades. All you'd need are a "buy" and "sell" order close together and a jittery stock price ranging between the two.
Click to expand...
Sorry but what occurred in his portfolio over 3 months was Day Trading 100%

President Donald Trump's financial disclosures indicate that his investment accounts executed over 3,600 individual stock trades during a single three-month quarter.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top