• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Pipelines, energy and natural resources

  • Thread starter Thread starter QV
  • Start date Start date
If the task is national sovereignty over energy transportation corridors one can say private industry hasn't done a great job.

And naturally the private sector has a part to play, it's more that we should do away with the notion that private industry will ever take the lead on such matters.
why should they? It isn't as though it won't get done unless they pay for it. The battery plants in Ontario are proof of that. Although perhaps if it didn't cost them decades of time and millions of dollars to get an approval they might be more willing to pony up. In fact they would because they would get it done faster and cheaper and be reaping the benefits a whole lot sooner.
 
I do love how the free market has failed repeatedly when put to task.
Failure to fulfill the arbitrary desires of governments in the face of their equally arbitrary decisions which impede free market behaviours is not a failure of a free market. Governments impose the structures which provide some of the incentives which drive behaviours.

Regardless, putting private enterprises to task would be closer to fascism than socialism.
 
Another tile in the complicated info-mosaic of energy infrastructure public opinion: more than 1/2 of Canadians surveyed say Canada should hang onto TMX, and OK with government investing in/owning pipelines.

A few highlights ...
View attachment 101609
View attachment 101610
View attachment 101612

How it was done:
View attachment 101611

If you want something done "properly", which is to say "your way", with any attendant costs that might incur, then do it yourself.

Others may not value costs and benefits the same.
 
If you want something done "properly", which is to say "your way", with any attendant costs that might incur, then do it yourself.

Others may not value costs and benefits the same.
Not to mention if government spends money on x, what does it decide not to spend money on.
 

Why fossil fuels continue to triumph: Energy density
Eighteen days on hydrogen, fifty on diesel


"Same hull. Same propellers. Different box in the middle. The reason comes down to one comparison, and it is not close.

"ACUA’s published Pioneer-class specification, laid out in detail by Uncrewed Systems Technology, puts endurance at 18 days on hydrogen and 50 days on diesel, both at an average 4 knots. That is the same boat doing the same job at the same speed, with the fuel as the only variable.

"The fuel cell is not the weak link. Pioneer runs a bespoke 45 kW unit from Nuvera that hits 58% thermal efficiency, against the 50 to 52% ACUA says most fuel cells manage. The problem is what you can physically carry.

"Hydrogen goes aboard as compressed gas in a modular frame that holds up to nine cylinders at 350 bar, roughly 10 kg apiece. Diesel goes aboard as about 4,000 litres of liquid that needs no pressure vessel at all, and buys around 5,000 nautical miles of range. Hydrogen wins per kilogram and loses badly per cubic foot, and a 46-foot boat is mostly cubic feet."
 
This kind of journalism, or this kind of collective advocacy? Chicken-egg? Toe-May-toe, to-mah-to?

The concept of a 'collective' approach to advocacy on the part of all First Nations in BC, all for the common good, is a myth.

In many cases, each band would happily throw their peers under the bus to gain an advantge of some kind.

They've learned alot from us ;)
 
The concept of a 'collective' approach to advocacy on the part of all First Nations in BC any region, or Canada, all for the common good, is a myth.
Tweaked that for you. And all it takes is one or two to swim against the tide.
They've learned alot from us ;)
They DID learn from the best - they don't call it "colonization" for nothing. Some would say we're being out lawyered by those Canada Past outlawyered.

And if we really want to fuel the deep-state conspiracy theories, let's not forget who funds many the advocacy organizations ;)
 
Tweaked that for you. And all it takes is one or two to swim against the tide.

They DID learn from the best - they don't call it "colonization" for nothing. Some would say we're being out lawyered by those Canada Past outlawyered.

And if we really want to fuel the deep-state conspiracy theories, let's not forget who funds many the advocacy organizations ;)

Glass half full: alot of First Nations are turning into really good, satble, economic generators for regions formerly reliant on the swings and roundabouts of the mercurial commodity markets.
 
Glass half full: alot of First Nations are turning into really good, satble, economic generators for regions formerly reliant on the swings and roundabouts of the mercurial commodity markets.
Very true - but they’re not always the squeakiest wheels getting the oil (no pun intended).
 
Back
Top