• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Informing the Army’s Future Structure - CAMO Discussion

And a G1 Heritage for buttons and bows.
Based on the current allocated structure, there is historical precedent to call the formation (as it is now) either 3 Canadian Light Infantry Brigade or 3 Infantry Group. But, the last time CA bundled a bunch of different cap badges into an organization that it called a regiment, that regiment eventually adopted a new cap badge based on the WWII parachute battalion. So, you are probably right.
 
Was there ever 3 CMBG, wasnt it just 3 CIBG?
And it in fact was heavily mechanized with Centurions, M113s, and brand new M109s. When I was going through the RCSA from 69-70, 3 CG had the primary role of being the reinforcement/replacement organization for 4 CMBG which itself was changing dramatically - moving bases and down-sizing. It was a crappy time to be a soldier.

🍻
 
Based on the current allocated structure, there is historical precedent to call the formation (as it is now) either 3 Canadian Light Infantry Brigade or 3 Infantry Group. But, the last time CA bundled a bunch of different cap badges into an organization that it called a regiment, that regiment eventually adopted a new cap badge based on the WWII parachute battalion. So, you are probably right.

As long as they don't try to claim a battle honour for Beledweyne.
 
Whelp... looks like a job just came up for our new 'footborne' brigade ;)

Canada wants into Britain's rapid-response defence club​

Formal application to Joint Expeditionary Force announced during Carney's U.K. visit​


Canada has formally applied to join the U.K.-led Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF), a collection of NATO nations whose mandate is to respond more quickly in a crisis.

Prime Minister Mark Carney formally announced the plan on Wednesday while meeting with his British counterpart Andy Burnham.

In a statement, Carney called JEF an "important initiative" and highlighted other close defence ties with the U.K., including Canada's observer status in the development of the next generation of fighter jet.


 
For the sake of discussion - what would it take to "upgrade" 3 CLIR to 3 CIBG? Are enablers any different from a CMBG beyond weight and scale?
CLIBG

Oh now you know expect the CA to have a TO&E for a Light Infantry entity AND a LAV based one. Geez. Your asking for a lot.

For years the only difference was someone had crossed out the LAV’s in the picture
 
Back
Top