• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The RCAF's Next Generation Fighter (CF-188 Replacement)

They order a new valve because the old one is leaking by slightly (meaning the valve seat/stem gasket inside is worn). They isolate the valve, drain the line into the bilge again, undo the cover of the valve with the handle on it (leaving the valve body in-line with the piping) and strip the new valve stem/handle from the new part they received, and put that on the old body that's still in-line. The new valve stem/handle has a new gasket that they transfer over, and they dump the old part in the box with the good bottom half that they never used, and send that back to return stores in about 3 years and 2 crews later when they find it under the bench in the stoker workshop.

Or something like that.

Never ;)
 
View attachment 102367

I will miss the false canopy.
I miss being able to tell which countries plane you're looking at simply by how it was painted overall instead of squinting at tiny roundels because everybody's stealth coating is identical...

What's the deal with the tail number? Temporary? We change the way we number our aircraft?

Also... it drives me nuts they insist on painting the corporate Government of Canada branding on RCAF aircraft like that. Looks out of place on the F-35.
 
Our first F-35 just flew!

Lots of "elbows up" people are very upset on X and FB, they actually thought Canada wasn't getting these aircraft.

Me? Damn, hell ya. Need 87 more. AT least.
 
Lots of "elbows up" people are very upset on X and FB, they actually thought Canada wasn't getting these aircraft.

Me? Damn, hell ya. Need 87 more. AT least.
We wouldn’t be in the mess of having to buy fighters right now (with our backs against the wall), if successive governments, supported by the now “elbows up people”, had not continually kicked the fighter replacement project down the road…
 
We wouldn’t be in the mess of having to buy fighters right now (with our backs against the wall), if successive governments, supported by the now “elbows up people”, had not continually kicked the fighter replacement project down the road…
Agreed. What still concerns me is that when Trump is gone, a certain segment of the population is going to be "Why spend money on defence?"

I tell people I know that "can't understand defence spending" that money spent on national defence is like insurance. You hate paying the bill and maybe don't think it is neccessary, but damn when you need it, your glad as F you have it.

Now on another note, the Mover and Gonky show (two former USN fighter pilots on Youtube with RCAF fighter friends) have said the F15EX would be the best choice for Canada's sovereign defence role.
 
Agreed. What still concerns me is that when Trump is gone, a certain segment of the population is going to be "Why spend money on defence?"

I tell people I know that "can't understand defence spending" that money spent on national defence is like insurance. You hate paying the bill and maybe don't think it is neccessary, but damn when you need it, your glad as F you have it.

Now on another note, the Mover and Gonky show (two former USN fighter pilots on Youtube with RCAF fighter friends) have said the F15EX would be the best choice for Canada's sovereign defence role.
Probably, but the F-15EX isn’t going to happen if the F-35 is just barely tolerated in Ottawa…
 
Probably, but the F-15EX isn’t going to happen if the F-35 is just barely tolerated in Ottawa…
Lets say its 2028 and Trump is leaving. Carney swings a deal to get 5% of F15EX parts made here, brands it as "more Canadian jobs and strong sovereignty" or some similar bullshit.

Its all in the spin
 
What's the deal with the tail number? Temporary? We change the way we number our aircraft?

We’ll see where this goes, but it could be the latest format for aircraft regs.

Historically, CAF/newRCAF aircraft registration used to be Cx-1## for the type designator and each aircraft had a ### fin number that combined with the type designator was that aircraft’s individual registration Cx-1#####, sometimes short-formed to just the numeric 1#####.

The CC-330 Husky (mil A330-based MRTT) changed that, in that the first number of the type designator changed from a 1 to a 3.

I doubt we’ll see use of the CF-1## format for the F-35 as the 135 type designator was already used for the Twin Huey, albeit as a CH-135 (vice potential CF-135). Same logic as why the CF-18 was actually type designated CF-188, as 118 was already taken by the CH-118 Iroquois (CUH-1H single Huey).

The letter A would be a new exception to the all-numeric six-numeral individual registration, but if the leading 1 to a 3 change happened, no reason why the A couldn’t also be a new version of CAF/RCAF type designation and individual
tail number/registration.

Also... it drives me nuts they insist on painting the corporate Government of Canada branding on RCAF aircraft like that. Looks out of place on the F-35.

That first ‘snuck’ onto CAF aircraft in ‘93, with Chretien’s pan-government rebranding. I was at an airshow and a civilian came up to me and asked what was with the ‘Canada Post’ writing on the aircraft (a VIP CC-144 Chllenger) beside mine (which didn’t yet have the new GoC letterhead ‘Canada’ painted on it)? It was the first time I had ever seen that. I laughed and said, “Hunh, I don’t know? I’ve never seen that before.” I still think it looks bureaucratically like a letterhead font. 🤷🏻‍♂️
 
Back
Top