- Reaction score
- 19,451
- Points
- 1,160
Apparently a "Telecommunication issue" and not a threat issue. Sounds like a cyberattack?

. . . they decided to roll out their new AI air traffic control route management system . . .
. . . while taking questions, Mullin couldn't let the opportunity pass when one of the journalists asked if the stoppage was related to artificial intelligence.
"There are thoughts that, you know, this could be an AI related error or issue," the reporter asked Mullin.
"We call it SI around here remember. SI," he said, before adding, "You just can't rule out anything at this point. We're going through that process and we're going to find out what happened."
The President calls it 'SI' because he's increasingly addled and doesn't realize that term already has a meaning. Everyone else repeating it is just being a toady.Don't let them hear you.
![]()
Markwayne Mullin Chides Reporter Amid FAA Ground Stoppage Chaos: ‘We Call it SI’
The stunning moment came as DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin was briefing reporters on the Federal Aviation Administration's sudden halting of all flights.www.yahoo.com
Trump & Musk biographer has a rundown o f the press conference. It was "interesting".
I thought I read that they pushed the update out Wednesday, but it took 24-36hrs for the problems to emerge.Why the hell would you push a big update on a Friday afternoon versus like overnight on Tuesday or something? Am I alone in finding that bizarre?
That could well be, yeah. Not gonna pretend I know anything about those systems.I thought I read that they pushed the update out Wednesday, but it took 24-36hrs for the problems to emerge.
possibly because the system was going to crash at some unpredictable point if they didn't. The FAA started work on a new system in 2003: called it nextgen. As of 2024 when the office closed they had achieved less than 20% of their stated goals. Without going into great detail, the goal was to replace the airways structure and RADAR tracking with ADS-B and GPS routes. This was largely successful as far as the software was concerned but the programming was layered onto decades old systems and it simply wasn't possible to re-fit enough of the older fleets of aircraft to operate on the new format. The owners weren't about to invest in systems that wouldn't provide payback until the FAA updated their ground systems to match so the system never reached that critical point where they could switch over. Their estimates on software costs didn't even begin to cover the reality (my fears regarding HS trains incidentally) so hardware updates largely went by the wayside. Consequently procedures couldn't be changed to reflect the new software.Why the hell would you push a big update on a Friday afternoon versus like overnight on Tuesday or something? Am I alone in finding that bizarre?
