Yes, which is why we can see the overt nature of the US’ NATO contribution fallacy. Almost uniquely, most NATO nations budget contributes completely towards the Alliance’s raison d’etre.
The US should be transparent and identify how much of its 3.6% GDP does NOT go towards NATO. Take PACOM, SOUTHCOM, AFRICOM, CENTCOM and supporting programs expenditures away and look at only NORTHCOM. EUCOM and supporting expenditures and the US doesn’t put even 2% towards NATO…
It will certainly easy the fighter force training/qualification challenges specifically and give more flex to instructor secondment load share across the various flying communities. For all intents, the PC-21 flies much more jet like than it does like an old school piston trainer like the...
You guys just destroyed a Snowbirds’ decade’s worth of operations at an air display. Not sure bulging crotch freedom eagles represent the best use of taxpayers’ money…
PC-21 will be just fine for the Snowbirds’ future.
Anyone who believes for a second that things like this and more extreme to come no doubt, weren’t going to happen, were/are deluding themselves.
It seems the question includes consideration as to whether we apologize and bend a knee, or see what we can rightfully pursue in our own best...
Makes it easier for the U.S. to claim jus ad bellum in order to take action as it sees fit to secure Canadian territory in the name of U.S. defense and security.
Jus in bello and jus post bellum are minor details that may or may not be worried about by the current administration.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.