- Reaction score
- 8,349
- Points
- 1,160
Fair enough, but if CBC's good enough for Team Blue to advertise ...
I would be a stupid business decision not to use what you're already paying for.
Fair enough, but if CBC's good enough for Team Blue to advertise ...
Corruption? What corruption?Well! THAT'LL show Meta who it's messing with by keeping news off its site!
![]()
Federal government ends boycott of advertising spending on Meta platforms
OTTAWA - The federal government has ended its boycott on buying advertisements on Meta platforms, including Facebook and Instagram.www.thecanadianpressnews.ca
![]()
These arenât the droids weâre looking for,Corruption? What corruption?
Nothing to see here folks. Mooovvvveeee along...
Did seem to work last summer (among other buys) to get PP's profile a bit kinder and gentler.Because it reaches their intended audienceâŚcurrent red-leaning voters.
GoC advertising a feel-good, pissing-in-a-dark-suit, Kumbayah message on CBC would primarily target the seals that already know how to clap.
Ladies & gentlemen, golf clap, please ....
![]()
CBC to stop paying individual bonuses after controversy
OTTAWA - CBC will no longer pay individual bonuses to employees, its board said in a statement Wednesday more than a year after concerns about the practice became political fodderwww.thecanadianpressnews.ca
So âdiscontinue [bonus]â and âadjust [base] salariesâŚto compensateâThe board said the decision is to discontinue what CBC refers to as "performance pay" and adjust salaries of affected staff to compensate them.
So they won't do bonuses anymore...Perhaps a bit early for the golf clapâŚ
So âdiscontinue [bonus]â and âadjust [base] salariesâŚto compensateâ
Many would/should prefer a pensionable increase in base salary in place of a non-pensionable bonus/performance pay.
The question is will the CBCâs salary envelope decrease? I bet it doesnâtâŚ
The Libs will double down on the CBC and increase funding thus ensuring the LPC has a friendly platform.Good question, headline writer - good question ....
![]()
CBC has escaped defunding, for now. So what happens next?
OTTAWA - At the beginning of the year, CBC was facing the very real prospect of being defunded by a Conservative government.www.thecanadianpressnews.ca
They already have one of the largest budgets, outstripping that of more important agencies, like CSIS.The Libs will double down on the CBC and increase funding thus ensuring the LPC has a friendly platform.
Well, it's out there (for the past few weeks) - including in Irish media, in case you don't trust Canadian media ...Did he though? I haven't been following.
Since we're picking on sources of information with "agendas", I'll take yours with a grain of salt, tooA little dated with some changes since, but if someone wants to smear Scheer as being a US citizen, they should at least mention the rest. Dual, Triple Citizenship MP's Shaping Canada's Political Destiny
Like I say. Prove the numbers wrong. Are the names and numbers false? Those two things are all that is required. A fair person would concentrate on the data and leave the fluff. So is the data wrong? Prove it and I'll admit that it's shenanigans. Yourself, and others, are dismissing it out of hand because of other non connected articles and personal bias. The crux of its place in the discussion is 'how many parliamentarians hold citizenship in other countries.' The data shows Scheer is not an outlier. The data is all that is needed. Not the commentary. If I do a search and one of the first hits provides the data, that's all I need. I can skim and get what I need without worrying about left/ right bias. To counter your point, CAP is not a whole lot different than posting a CBC article to back your point. We know that they are biased and regularly print leftist mistruths. Yet people quote their articles all the time and it doesn't turn into a shitfest.Well, it's out there (for the past few weeks) - including in Irish media, in case you don't trust Canadian media ...
Since we're picking on sources of information with "agendas", I'll take yours with a grain of salt, too
![]()
Is Christmas In Canada About To Transition To A Celebration Of Hamas?
âThe Canadian Human Rights Commission, which wields broad quasi-judicial powers, argued that a day off on Christmas is 'discriminatory.'" Read morecapforcanada.com
![]()
When It Comes To A "State Religion" Justin Trudeau Chooses LGBT
"Anyone found to have misgendered contrary to the Canadian Human Rights Act can be liable for paying thousands in compensation for their wrongs." Read morecapforcanada.com
![]()
In Desperation, Trudeau Advances Marxist Class Warfare In Canada
"Itâs socialism being sold to a Canadian public who canât vote on it until 2025 at the earliest." Read morecapforcanada.com
If the commentary (or, to use another word, opinion) isn't needed, why's the headline not about the data, but an opinion? "Dual, Triple Citizenship MPâs Shaping Canadaâs Political Destiny"Like I say. Prove the numbers wrong. Are the names and numbers false? Those two things are all that is required. A fair person would concentrate on the data and leave the fluff. So is the data wrong? Prove it and I'll admit that it's shenanigans. Yourself, and others, are dismissing it out of hand because of other non connected articles and personal bias. The crux of its place in the discussion is 'how many parliamentarians hold citizenship in other countries.' The data shows Scheer is not an outlier. The data is all that is needed. Not the commentary.
You're right -- nobody ever mentions leftist bias and "bought and paid for media" around here, sprinkled in as throw-away, discussion-seasoning tidbit, even in between posting links to stuff from said media that proves a point the poster agrees with or wants to highlight (like all those Communist Globe & Mail articles on Chinese interference, or Red/Toronto Star editorials calling for Trudeau to GTFO).... posting a CBC article to back your point. We know that they are biased and regularly print leftist mistruths. Yet people quote their articles all the time and it doesn't turn into a shitfest.
I haven't done a tally, but I'll grant you the numbers of MP's with multiple passports are bang on.So, bottom line, disprove the data, as of time of publication.
Comparing CAP to CBC News is like insisting your cousin's conspiracy blog is just as credible as the New England Journal of Medicineâbecause âeveryone has bias.â Come on, man. One is a federally regulated public broadcaster with named journalists, editorial standards, and actual sourcing; the other is an anonymous digital chalkboard scribbled with anti-immigrant fever dreams and zero citations. The fact that you still think this is a valid equivalence isnât just bafflingâit borders on epistemological malpractice. At some point, youâve got to stop digging.To counter your point, CAP is not a whole lot different than posting a CBC article to back your point. We know that they are biased and regularly print leftist mistruths. Yet people quote their articles all the time and it doesn't turn into a shitfest.
So, bottom line, disprove the data, as of time of publication.
The title is part of the fluff. Itâs unfortunate some can't separate the wheat from the chaff.If the commentary (or, to use another word, opinion) isn't needed, why's the headline not about the data, but an opinion? "Dual, Triple Citizenship MPâs Shaping Canadaâs Political Destiny"
I haven't done a tally, but I'll grant you the numbers of MP's with multiple passports are bang on.
when looking at the traffic, yeah low trust, low organic hits,Comparing CAP to CBC News is like insisting your cousin's conspiracy blog is just as credible as the New England Journal of Medicineâbecause âeveryone has bias.â Come on, man. One is a federally regulated public broadcaster with named journalists, editorial standards, and actual sourcing; the other is an anonymous digital chalkboard scribbled with anti-immigrant fever dreams and zero citations. The fact that you still think this is a valid equivalence isnât just bafflingâit borders on epistemological malpractice. At some point, youâve got to stop digging.
If the numbers were the kernel of the story, there would only be a table showing âwhatâ, not conclusions drawn from the numbers showing âso what?âThe title is part of the fluff. Itâs unfortunate some can't separate the wheat from the chaff.
The numbers were the whole point. See my first sentence.
Someone skipped the scientific method lessons back in the day lol. If you're looking for certain numbers, the data you want, you're exposing yourself to all sorts of misinformation as long as it suits your narrative. How do you know CAP or any other Rebel News adjacent is actually operating in good faith and not making numbers up out of thin air? How do you know they aren't misrepresenting the truth? These kinds of outfits have no standards and frankly, no professional morals. Instead of CBC as a comparison, would you use Jacobin? Because that is a lot closer of a comparison.CBC or CAP. Neither is any different to me. I donât care who publishes the information I need, if the article has the data I want, I'll use it.
Perhaps we're running past each other here.If the numbers were the kernel of the story, there would only be a table showing âwhatâ, not conclusions drawn from the numbers showing âso what?â