• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

British Columbia NDP Majority Government 2024-(no later than) 2029

Well, they outlawed Air BnBs so....


Rob Shaw: B.C. taxpayer cash fuelling condos, documentaries and cushy new jobs​

While British Columbians cut back, MLAs find creative new ways to spend public money


Money is tight for most British Columbians these days. But you wouldn’t know it from the way some politicians are burning through your cash over at the B.C. legislature.

Double dipping on housing allowances, using public money to film faux-documentaries, and big pay packages for superfluous new special advisors are just a few of the most recent examples of your tax dollars getting flushed down the proverbial toilet.

MLAs from all parties quietly voted this week to let themselves rent out rooms in their taxpayer-funded Victoria condos—to each other. The move clears the way to double dip on housing allowances to the tune of almost $52,000 annually.

The policy changes, made at the Legislative Assembly Management Committee, will permit an MLA who owns a residence in Victoria and is already receiving up to $25,983 per year in an allowed “capital city living allowance” to cover their mortgage, to also rent a room in their unit to another MLA, and then draw up to $25,983 in rental allowances from that same colleague.

The double-dip scenario means the MLA would walk away with up to $51,966, depending on the rental agreement and what is determined to be “fair market rent” at the moment.


 
Legal summary from Cassels Brock law firm:


So why is BC negotiating with First Nations at all?

If the 1763 Crown Proclamation is the basis of law and only Ottawa has the continuing power then only those agreements approved by Ottawa are valid. No?

BC brought the Douglas Treaty lands into Confederation.

Ottawa's suzerainty over the rest of BC was established by negotiation between the Crown in London and the US.

And the 1763 proclamation didn't deprive the local residents of their lands. It confirmed their title and established the Crown as the only legitimate negotiator.

In Alberta's case the Crown in Ottawa negotiated settlement rights with the locals and then subdivided those lands to establish separate provinces. The provincial Crown is subordinate to the federal Crown.


I think...
 
Ottawa's suzerainty over the rest of BC was established by negotiation between the Crown in London and the US.

I’m pretty sure the US had nothing to do with that. The present boundary on the 49th was settled by the Oregon Treaty prior to confederation. The boundary with Alaska was settled in an international tribunal after BC entering Confederation, with London siding with Washington. The Douglas Treaties were started after the Oregon Treaty and before Confederation. BC entering Confederation was more of a negotiation between London and Ottawa with maybe some input from Victoria/New Westminster.
 
So why is BC negotiating with First Nations at all?

If the 1763 Crown Proclamation is the basis of law and only Ottawa has the continuing power then only those agreements approved by Ottawa are valid. No?

BC brought the Douglas Treaty lands into Confederation.

Ottawa's suzerainty over the rest of BC was established by negotiation between the Crown in London and the US.

And the 1763 proclamation didn't deprive the local residents of their lands. It confirmed their title and established the Crown as the only legitimate negotiator.

In Alberta's case the Crown in Ottawa negotiated settlement rights with the locals and then subdivided those lands to establish separate provinces. The provincial Crown is subordinate to the federal Crown.


I think...
A court case deemed the "Crown" is indivisible, so Provincial or Federal, it's seen as one.
 
Who is the bigger idiot, Eby or Rustad?

BC is in a "hole" lot of hurt.
 
As an Albertan that enjoys being a Canadian I wish you would sort yourselves out.

It is getting to the point that it would be easier to get a pipeline to tidewater in Washington or Alaska. Perhaps if we paid for it ourselves we could reduce our shipping costs and increase the revenues.
 
As an Albertan that enjoys being a Canadian I wish you would sort yourselves out.

It is getting to the point that it would be easier to get a pipeline to tidewater in Washington or Alaska. Perhaps if we paid for it ourselves we could reduce our shipping costs and increase the revenues.

Alberta, looking at BC right now ;)

Hippies GIF
 
Let’s go on over to the BC Property Value Assessment office to see what they think of this matter.

Oh, hello …

IMG_1503.png
 
Terry Glavin is arguing that BC needs treaties.

In 1763 Britain ruled the world and King George III could warn off the French and the Spanish and the Americans and declare that only he and he alone was going to negotiate with the locals.

Does Canada carry the same weight today? BC?

Or are other people free to make offers? Alberta? The US? The Chinese?

 
Oh this is going to blow up in the government and FN face


All you colonizer white devils are now officially on a very dark path …


Wanna see support for first nations plumet... This is how it happen
 
This will never end. The FN will continue to demand "their" land back, more money.

I think the FN were nomadic and moved around to hunt and fish so they think wherever they fished etc, buried a relative, it is their land.

Where would they be today if the colonizer never arrived?
 
This will never end. The FN will continue to demand "their" land back, more money.

I think the FN were nomadic and moved around to hunt and fish so they think wherever they fished etc, buried a relative, it is their land.

Where would they be today if the colonizer never arrived?
That nomadic part is a lot less true on the West Coast where village sites existed for centuries in a single location.

This is part of the problem- there is no single “First Nation”. It really depends where you are in Canada.
 
Wanna see support for first nations plumet... This is how it happen

The Cowichan leadership know this and are working hard to clarify a few things - they agree that the Judge screwed up too ...


Cowichan Tribes issues statement to clear up ‘misinformation’ surrounding its Aboriginal title case​



Cowichan Tribes leadership is firing back at Richmond Mayor Malcolm Brodie, Premier David Eby, and other politicians who have recently made public statements about the Cowichan Nation’s Aboriginal title case.

They call the statements about the effect of the B.C. Supreme Court’s judgement on individual private property owners misleading and “deliberately inflammatory.”

“To be clear,” the statement says, “the Cowichan Nation’s court case regarding their settlement lands at Tl’uqtinus in Richmond has not and does not challenge the effectiveness or validity of any title held by individual private landowners. The ruling does not erase private property.”

 
Wanna see support for first nations plumet... This is how it happen
choose your favourite metaphor: close the barn door after the horse has escaped, the camel is in the tent. all apply and with the mindset of our current court system we are truly f***ed
 
Back
Top