• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Search results

  1. McG

    Liberal Minority Government 2025 - ???

    Guess some countries have already implemented a ban. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cg7y10xm4x2o
  2. McG

    Liberal Minority Government 2025 - ???

    The reason behind the proposed X ban is getting news coverage. I don’t think one needs to have seen the images in the wold to know of them. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/09/musks-x-ordered-by-uk-government-to-tackle-wave-of-indecent-imagery-or-face-ban
  3. McG

    2026 US-Denmark Tensions/End of NATO

    Maybe not all Europe, but it looks like a quorum is preparing a reassurance mission.
  4. McG

    Trump administration 2024-2028

    A bleak analysis of Trump’s America https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/01/trump-mistake-venezuela-injustice/685560/?gift=SCYx-5scVta3-cr_IlgTyTfQFoG8XVbzEA1rhhSjomQ
  5. McG

    Defending Canada from American Military aggression

    Firearms legislation and gun culture in Canada will not be the difference in the nations survival. If you don't think the CAF can make a relevant difference, a bunch of civilians with assault rifles are not going to do much more against tanks and fighters. But, survival will require delay, and...
  6. McG

    A Deeply Fractured US

    Tou might want to edit that. It is not clear if you are being sarcastic, or if you are endorsing the occasional killing of innocents to achieve ICE goals.
  7. McG

    A Deeply Fractured US

    The incident was also not an aberration; it was one occurrence of a trend. https://www.wsj.com/us-news/videos-show-how-ice-vehicle-stops-can-escalate-to-shootings-caf17601
  8. McG

    Defending Canada from American Military aggression

    He is sabre rattling invasion against NATO. Canada cannot secure itself on a hope CoA that Trump is read to use force against NATO but not against us. Anschluss happened because Germany thought they could do it without a fight. Anschluss worked because Austria did not fight. If Canada wants to...
  9. McG

    Defending Canada from American Military aggression

    Trump has said he would compel Canada to become part of the US. That is not a polite invitation. That is hostile.
  10. McG

    Trump administration 2024-2028

    He has no strategy. https://www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-trumps-washington/why-donald-trump-wants-greenland-and-everything-else
  11. McG

    Trump administration 2024-2028

    North Korea vibes, or Axis Powers 2.0? “It’s the greatest disorder, the law of the strongest, and everyday people wonder whether Greenland will be invaded, whether Canada will be under the threat of becoming the 51st state (of the United States) or whether Taiwan is to be further circled.”...
  12. McG

    2026 US-Denmark Tensions/End of NATO

    Dude, when you are in a functioning democracy being forcibly annexed by another nation, it is a fight against oppression. Benevolent nations do not forcibly annex (nor threaten to annex) functioning democracies. You can’t bring your self to say it is wrong without then spending more effort...
  13. McG

    CAN-USA Tariff Strife (split from various pol threads)

    You have argued that Canada is not worth fighting for; not worth dying for. You have presented your imagined positives of being annexed. These are not arguments that discriminate between military or civilian audiences, and you are not addressing ordinary citizens. You are making these arguments...
  14. McG

    CAN-USA Tariff Strife (split from various pol threads)

    This is Army.ca. An Army defends its nation. If you want to minimize/rationalize/moralize (and when you insist on describing all the "good aspects" of being forcibly annexed, you are minimizing, rationalizing and moralizing the annexation) or otherwise argue that Canada should not resist a...
  15. McG

    Canada moves to 2% GDP end of FY25/26 - PMMC

    If we figure out a way to hybridize PS and PRes service for specific roles, that would make sense. We don't need the day-to-day GS sustainment to be military on the day-to-day, but it would need to be something that could be mobilized at the same time as the equipment that it supports.
  16. McG

    CAN-USA Tariff Strife (split from various pol threads)

    Neither the post you quoted nor your post discussed fighting for Canada. You quoted a complete post saying that Canadians should have a right to choose before being annexed, and you called that idea "abstract fluff." You then went on to promote why you would be content to be lebensraum'ed by the...
  17. McG

    Canada moves to 2% GDP end of FY25/26 - PMMC

    In Canada under the extant NDA, this day-to-day support should be Reg Force in regional (or sub-regional) general support service battalions (GSSBs).
  18. McG

    2026 US-Denmark Tensions/End of NATO

    He has provided his list of why he would be content to be Lebensraum'ed in the thread on Trump's hostility to Canada. Let's not pollute more threads with the nonsense.
  19. McG

    CAN-USA Tariff Strife (split from various pol threads)

    If it is wrong, why can you not touch on the subject of annexation without trying to sell all its "merits"? We are much less binary than the US, and seats are won by thrid & forth party candidates as well as independants. That is much better than the US, but I recall you were a strong proponent...
  20. McG

    CAN-USA Tariff Strife (split from various pol threads)

    Canada & Denmark are functioning democracies. This is not freeing peoples from oppressive or dysfunctional governments. The context of US annexing Canada or Greenland is 100% in favour of that being an act of evil. "It's bad, but we should not resist, and let me tell you why it would actually...
Back
Top