Search results

I’m assuming that the 20% is just for the Federal level. What about the Provincial level?

Sadly for us as well. Those investments that Carney had worked so hard with the Qatari's.... https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/carney-in-qatar-9.7050314

So the US sits about 15% of its workforce working for all level's of government. If the US included all private colleges/universities into their numbers I wonder what % they would be at. As some Colleges/Universities are public and some are private, it means that some are included as...

True! But its just the boy's blowing off a bit a steam.

I guess they could set up their version of 'North Korea' where a family/elite governs with unbridled wealth/power and feed the masses enough lies to keep them in check.

Japan - there's a western country for you.

Fixed it for you. They are tied at the hip on this one.

Were they holding the world hostage on energy on Feb 20th? Cause and effect.

tick tick tick

And another tangible example of a country impacted by the US-Israeli war against Iran. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rxz7ggv8go Shops and restaurants in Egypt told to close early as energy crisis deepens The countdown to the US needing to shut down this war ticked a few seconds closer...

Spain seems to be doubling down...... https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwy368j1e3lo Spain closes airspace to US aircraft involved in Iran war

Yellow cake, cough cough, yellow cake from Niger.......

10-20yrs of watching their neighbours do well with jobs and band revenue/dividend payments will eventually change their tune. The old axiom - "money talks" is still working today and will most likely 20yrs from now.

Ture that! But I'm making the point of if you're comparing a family of 4 vs a couple of retirees, then the looking at direct subsidizes needs to include the 5 or 10$/day government subsidizes being paid indirectly out to the family of 4. Factor in how much is lost the moment 1 of the retirees...

I think that you should factor in the subsidized costs of child care that the families received for the 2yr old. Those are direct subsidizes indirectly paid out the family.

Setting up their ability to 'tick off' those 4 boxes and then exit from the entire situation. 1) - Tick 2) - Tick 3) - Close to be 'ticked' 4) - Could be a 'tick' already, completely opened ended with no tangible definitions of what's 'in' and 'out' of scope.

Its all part of Carney's example of 'living the lie.'

All could be very well true - but, my next question would be, are those who are left making any indications that they want to change/alter/remove what has been put in place previously? If not, then those 'NDP' liked individuals are still at the helm of the boat and are intent on steering that...

It's almost like there's a NDP vs PC/Blue Liberal divide between those 2 people.....

Forget Stanford or MIT, locally for me it would be McMaster's with this long and robust nuclear programme that would be bombed into oblivion under his logic.