Go look it up. It would require a passport or birth certificate. There is a lot less republicans than democrats with passports. It would literally disenfranchise many more republicans.
The formal reason they provide isn’t going to be our base that wants this is going to be the ones effected by...
Yeah because they realized it would hurt republicans a lot more than democrats. Most republicans don’t have passports.
It’s like Texas gerrymandering, yeah you basically guaranteed another 5 republican seats, however you put 10 safe seats at risk. Just very short sighted poorly thought through...
He really needs to figure out a message to sell to Canadians, not just the social Conservative base. To me it looks like he is floundering, Carney has ripped the carpet out from under him on most the common sense stuff, leaving him with only the social Conservative stuff, which doesn't sell well...
The papers are going to sensationalize whatever they can. Legally they aren’t wrong, every firearm is legally a weapon, and every firearm is dangerous, that is what gives it value.
The fact that your average firearms owner is less dangerous than your average citizen is lost on the general...
Same boat here except the wife can’t bring in income more than casual income (we have a severely disabled child to care for).
My income alone is above the national household average in a low cost of living area, yet there is no real getting ahead.
Everytime I have gotten a raise it seems...
Tried to find it on CBC news, not a sign of it.
Unfortunately this looks like it shall be like the giant protest on capital hill in the 90s (over 10k attendees), largely ignored by the media because it doesn’t fit their narrative.
You may feel it was addressed, much of the public does not. Yes it isn’t likely to happen again, however that doesn’t mean those responsible have been held accountable.
It’s about when you don’t nail it that’s a issue. It’s about the lack of accountability for those who fail to nail it. Police...
Well it is. Plenty of examples of RCMP officers breaking the law without consequences. Look at High River where they were found to have broken the law yet not a single officer or higher up was charged.
Not many jobs where you can threaten someone with a gun and still keep the job and be...
Depends on the firearm. Anything that was once US property is a no go without act of congress (such as M1 Garands, M1 Carbines, etc.). Not to mention there is all sorts of rules on what is allowed in ranging from physical characteristics (say AR-15s) to country of origin (Chinese and Russian...
https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/controls-controles/firearms-armes_a_feu/export_requirements-exigences_exportation.aspx?lang=eng
Basically even if the US was to allow it into country you need a exporter with the proper licences, a importer with the proper US licences and approval...
We literally had to pay slave owners for the value of their ‘property’ when slavery was ended. It is a legal obligation, property rights are enshrined in law. The Canadian bill of rights, it being a pre-1867 right, and common-law requiring fair value for property.
Considering I have not yet...
Considering they are starting by saying they refuse to offer any money for AR-15 uppers right there is the case being heard. You also can’t negotiate based on duress which saying there is ‘limited funds’ and ‘first come first serve’ is. They have a legal obligation to pay fair value, they can’t...
Destroy the property in October, with recording and then sue for the value of the property. I still have the receipts for the property.
In my case I have a registered AR-15. They know I have it, there is no just hide option, which even if available I wouldn’t take as I do follow the law as...
There is also property they have already declared they refuse to pay for (such as AR-15 uppers, which is a substantial amount of value in). This could get very expensive if people choose to hold their legs to the fire.
I can’t wait for the class action lawsuit for proper payment if this does all happen. You can’t just declare property illegal and not compensate for it as much as the Liberals seem to think they can.
The ‘limited time frame’ and ‘limited funds available’ is just scare tactics to try and force...
Do not take me as pro-China, they are a threat, just not a immediate strategic threat.
Right now the biggest threat to our sovereignty and economy is unfortunately the US which should be our greatest ally. Trying to fight China and the US at the same time isn’t a winning option for us...
In the immediate term yes.
China isn’t a immediate strategic threat to Canada. They aren’t going to invade us and economically they are stable with us. Ultimately their goals are regional (South China sea, Taiwan, East Russia, etc.), not global, with anything they have going on globally being...
We are too arrogant to even consider listening to other nations experience. We pretend we are capable and knowledgeable yet as a institution we are barely holding it together.
Just look at the Mar Eng disaster where we amalgamated stokers, e-techs, and hull techs despite being told by the...
The problem is your fighting a emotional argument with facts and reason. Those with the emotions don’t care about the facts.
It is up to the people wanting to prohibit a act or item to prove what they want is positive. They cannot do that statistically or in a court of law (hence moving the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.