- Reaction score
- 3,624
- Points
- 1,040
The problem is your fighting a emotional argument with facts and reason. Those with the emotions don’t care about the facts.
It is up to the people wanting to prohibit a act or item to prove what they want is positive. They cannot do that statistically or in a court of law (hence moving the ‘evidence’ to state secret last time).
Instead they rely on emotion and ignore the facts to get what they want. Bringing up the US and situations which are completely different from the reality in Canada as their examples. Much like say anti-hunting groups showing footage of illegal bear hunts in the states to argue for no bear hunts in Canada.
It is dishonest and even worse they created much of their false narrative by allowing criminals to run rampant for a decade. Literally creating a crisis then offering a ‘solution’ which has nothing to do with the actual problem.
Firearms which have been legal for 80+ years in country aren’t the issue, but our politicians like to pretend they are because addressing the real problems is much harder.
