Search results

Sweet dreams

Yup. Especially since he will lose an MP here and there for various reasons

Challenge accepted. Can it happen to this thread?

I am no RCEME guy but the tech back then was a lot simpler. Their was very little if any FCS in the AFVs. Certainly not much in the way of comms. Modern AFVs and the comms/fire control is a hell of a lot more advanced and needs the proper techs to maintain them. Hell, I am an M113 guy and I...

So I will chime in on a kind of this subject, kind of not. Nate Erskine-Smith got f*cked over the Ontario Liberal party nomination for Scarborough. For those not in the know, Nate is currently the Federal Liberal MP for Beaches North York. Normally he grates my nerves but I will admit Carney...

Your doing a fine job, young man, keep up the good work!

Switch gears for a second. I will give Uncle Mark (PM MC) an atta boy! On what? I am hearing more and more, and seeing some of it, some actual positive changes in the Forces. While true, many of these changes were planned by military and/or long time coming, the fact is we would NOT move...

Names of regiments are just ceremony. Yes the PPCLI is not LI (at least 1VP and 2 VP) But what are the guards guarding? Do the various rifle regiments carry only rifles? How many scots are in the scottish and highland regiments? Are the Foresters true Foresters? Well yes to some extent, many...

To be honest, a few years ago I didn't think any of this was EVER a possibility. I like this direction and this is one of the things I appreciate the current GoC supporting

Sooo, whats your take on the future of our arty in terms of types of batteries? Do you see SP batteries being the main field force sub units? What about all the CUAS and Loitering munitions? Does that fall under arty still? How about the AD side? Would it make sense to have an AD for the field...

SAAB's link https://www.saab.com/newsroom/press-releases/2026/saab-launches-new-carl-gustaf-anti-tank-round

On the topic of Canadian economy and job losses...

Agreed. The sooner the ship turns 180 the better. Enough "clean energy", "Climate competitiveness", "Carbon capture", etc. Many of these are out of date belief driven agendas and hinder the biggest potential economic driver in our nation, good old oil and gas.

Or you can open you eyes. Its all over the news, has been for years, left and right leaning media talking about how we need to solve a laundry list of issues, that somehow, never get sorted out. Its seriously picking fly shit out of pepper. Canada is IN trouble. Or believe what you want. My...

One principle of war that would benefit Canada as a whole is Select and Maintain the Aim. This thread alone with these last couple of post shows we have a few here arguing over the "validity" of the X post rather than focus on the fact that Canada is in trouble. Our society as a whole...

Read, son, read. I accept the original X post so I am ok with it.

If you want to deep dive, go for it https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/economic-surveys/canada-economic-snapshot.html A few here don't want to hear news thats not so good for Canada. Either choose to face reality or keep ignoring it pretending its not so.

I can't remember if it was Toronto Sun or The Hub or whatever, but they said USA GDP gowth was projected to be double of Canada's this year and next year

From google AI (take with a grain of skepticism) The OECD ranks Canada among the lowest of its member nations for GDP per capita growth, particularly over the last decade. While aggregate GDP has shown resilience, persistent population growth has masked weak per-capita performance, resulting...