Search results

What happens when one country is fighting Iran/Iraq/Venezuela/Argentina? Do the other 5 eyes nations get a veto, keeping the subs out of the conflict? Or do the subs' crews get dragged into conflicts their government is otherwise not involved in? If the former, why would the Americans ever...

We always need more Signals Officers. Don't be afraid of the Army, we're friendly (mostly).

EW has much of the same problem. Like AD we all know it is important (in the abstract) but we never train with it. So we don't see the value it brings. Not bringing enablers to collective training events not only atrophies our ability to employ them in the short term it sets up a "What have you...

Branding is a big problem. If we aren't selling ourselves to the public why would we expect them to be interested in us and want to join us? What is a Sig Op? To a regular person that doesn't mean anything. Our trade names should be evocative of what we do so people off the street can...

Those are great questions but too big to answer fully in a thread about budgets. The short answer is the CAF has spent decades siphoning resources away from Sigs (and other support trades). The poor training, lack of equipment, and shitty leadership have caused us to bleed soldiers for a long...

https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/26/us/pentagon-shoots-down-cbp-drone WTF is going on down there?

We talk a big game about crawl, walk, run but then expect everything to be perfect and make a big splash the first time we do it. Was it super effective for the PTA during MR 23? No, but it was the first time, so that's fine. Just getting Army guys and Space guys on the same exercise and talking...

I was there, I don't think many people were mad, because they didn't notice, because it wasn't very effective. We should definitely doing more of this. By not training defence/immediate actions on jamming and other electronic attacks we are setting our forces up for failure. Wishing away all...

Hear me out, toboggan harnesses attached to the front of the TAPV. It allows you employ way more people with your limited equipment. It fixes the TAPV VOR problem. It is much quieter, so better during recces.

I think networks are encompassed in C5IRST.

Various HQs And probably Cyber Comd, or whatever it is actually called

I don't understand your question.

I think you and I differ on the meaning of "pretty new" if you are saying something started in the '60s qualifies.

Many of the terms are defined in the paper that you linked above: Translated: CJADC2 is the American way of looking at the problem set, with American doctrine informing it, supported by American networks (both equipment and the concept of) to achieve American goals Source: Pan-Domain...

No we aren't, per Carney, we are literally planning to do the opposite. Canada joins EU defense fund as the country pivots away from the US "Carney has said he intends to diversify Canada’s procurement and enhance the country’s relationship with the EU. He has previously said that no more will...

Because, like infants, you need maximum supervision? "The infantry had drawing time, lets take a look...it's just a bunch of pictures of dicks...also, all the crayons are now missing."

No. Just regular public servants, like we have now. People to fix buildings, repair vehicles, re-image computers, etc in garrison. During a crisis the field force deploys and is supported by its organic CS/CSS elements. When the crisis is over the field force returns to base and public servants...

Sigs: Current Bde HQ and Sigs Sqns to Regts Divs get Sigs Regts The Army gets a Sigs Regt Each new Bde gets a Sigs unit (I think Regt sized but can't remember for sure) CCSB gets Organic Sigs The Light Infantry Regt gets organic Sigs in its HQ (Coy sized? I am not sure, only saw it in document)...