lisa_barbi said:
I read some place that the 2 chest pockets and the shirt cargo pockets held rifle magazines, but if the magazines where fully loaded, would it not rip the shirt? How comfertable would it have been? Could you use them to hold magazines while wearing the p82 web gear?
Full mags would not rip the shirt, as it was designed to withstand the stresses. Carrying magazines this way was uncomfortable and the magazines were awkward to get in and out, especially during fire-and-movement, and whenever one changed shirts a lot of stuff had to be removed and put into the clean shirt. The 82 Pattern webbing had magazine pouches, including pouches for the C1 SMG (no means of carrying them were provided prior to that), so carrying magazines in pockets was no longer required.
The olive green combat clothing was designed along with the 64 Pattern webbing, which was very lightweight, had few pouches (mess tin pouch, water bottle pouch, grenade pouch, and compass pouch, but no magazine pouches - many people took to using 51 Pattern ammunition pouches for magazines).
Photographs and description of the 82 Pattern webbing components can be found at http://mpmuseum.org/securequip2.html.
Figure 3 of http://ftp.rta.nato.int/public//PubFullText/RTO/MP/RTO-MP-056///MP-056-18A.pdf lacks the mess tin/utility pouch, which should be on the opposite side of the small pack from the water bottle carrier. These may have been reversed at some units. This paper may be of interest to those who want to know more about development of the current CTS equipment (Tac Vest, Small Pack, and Rucksack).
There's another photo at http://www.queensu.ca/conferences/mvhr/images/pdf/presentations/Stevenson_Joan_MVHR2010.pdf, which shows the water bottle on the right-hand side, where I carried mine.
lisa_barbi said:
WOW! wish I was around back than.
If you were, then you would be as old as some of us. The trade-off may or may not have been worth it.
Are you near any military museums?