- Reaction score
- 2,541
- Points
- 1,190
It's not a fine approach. It's an blindly anti-establishment, anti-elite approach, regardless of who's actually "right". The populist leader caters to screams and demands of the populace, regardless of whether what they are demanding makes sense, is actually helpful, is based on actual fact, etc.A populist approach (which you really think he is aiming at?) is aimed at winning populist, no?
A populist in terms of being patriotic to Canada is fine BTW. It often gets muddled and mixed up with extremist/racist/misogynist, etc)
You might argue, "if the people demand it, we should give it to them". That's the populist approach. But if the people are demanding something that doesn't make any sense because they've been fed outright lights and fabrications by social media and mainstream media, then what they are demanding is flawed, and you would hope that a knowledgeable leader would do the right thing instead, and not just feed their flames for their own benefit.
Of course, the opposite exists and is equally flawed; ignoring the will and demands of the people and letting the country be run by self-interested elites: elitism. The money is in the middle: pluralism.