No.
Military aircraft maintenance is really good. In many cases better than what civvies do.
I have worked on both and would say Military Aircraft maintenance is good but allowable defects is much more forgiving on military aircraft then civilian.
My experience on military aircraft leaking hydraulic fluid can be allowed. On Civilian commercial aircraft not allowed. Both maintain a high level of Airworthiness but the Military has much more allowable tolerances.
It really was interesting working with both.
But.
Military aircraft are not always designed the same way as civilian aircraft and militaries don’t keep maintenance records the same way civil operators do (we keep maintenance records- they just look different). For example, spare parts are tracked on some fleets completely differently than a civvy operator would be required to do.
This is pretty basic explanation and a good one. Similar process different standards.
Parts are very interesting. Oil hoses maybe changed out based on flight hours, calendar days or when they actually fail (leak). Each industry has their own standard for such and each aircraft and each hose can be tracked differently.
Things as simple as a bolt may be serialized and tracked from manufacturing to destruction. One Standard does not do this while the other does.
The Military has been updating their system for years to falling closer inline with civilian standards. But many things do not cross over such as acceptable loss. IE battle damage and or risk factors.
So, to bring an ex-military fleet into the civil register means doing all the mods that the civvies care about but the military maybe does not; translating decades worth of maintenance records into a language Transport Canada (and future AMEs can understand); and then get TC inspectors (who on average have a knowledge base that is a mile wide and an inch deep). and probably some ADM to put their signatures on a document granting civil airworthiness. If anything goes wrong- those signatories are on the hook, potentially.
You can see why this gets so hard.
Coulson is one of the tops around to convert military aircraft into viable civilian certified.
It is funny that they have such a hard time with the Canadian Government considering what all they do for them, that is what happens when your compitition has close ties with those in power.
Hopefully we see change in polices to allow Coulson to do what they do best. That is to provide Aircraft for aerial firefighting, utilizing ex service aircraft so they don't go to the scrap yard.