• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

25 April 2026 - Apparent shooting at White House Correspondents’ Dinner

The PS from Allen's manifesto contains his observations of security at the event and it's not pretty.

Newsweek Article
I’d find his opinion on the security more compelling had he accomplished any of his goals instead of ending up face first on the ground under a polyester pig pile…

His opinions of security written before the fact don’t appear to match his experiences in the moment. There will always be a point far enough from the secure space that you can access weapons. What matters is whether you ever have a realistic chance of bringing those weapons to bear against the protectees. He appears not to have.

He didn’t even make it to the same floor as the event space. He ran in at a dead sprint, made it maybe a few tens of meters past the first hard checkpoint and got muckled on to.

Major event security has layers and depth that serve different purposes. The measure of efficacy is in the totality and the end result, not the performance of a single layer in isolation. The magnetometers existed to funnel traffic through a controlled perimeter checkpoint and force the discovery of weapons far enough out that it’s safe to do so. The security measures forced him to behave in a way that caused the threat to be detected and stopped successfully.
 
Is this a defined term in the RCMP doctrine?

Asking for a friend.

:giggle:
It seems to be "official" ...
... with this hilarious disclaimer: "Not to be confused police brutality, excessive force, unlawful force, police misconduct, anything else bad, wrong, or negative."
 
Having read the full manifesto now, there are a couple strange things.

Two of the more prominent being the very specific exclusion of Patel as a target, and thinking buckshot over slugs would somehow reduce collateral in a room full of people.
 
The PS from Allen's manifesto contains his observations of security at the event and it's not pretty.
Seems rather arrogant himself. Everything is expressed as an extreme: no, not, no-one. A bit of concern trolling thrown in.

Great monologing, though.
 
Back
Top