• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

25 April 2026 - Apparent shooting at White House Correspondents’ Dinner

The PS from Allen's manifesto contains his observations of security at the event and it's not pretty.

Newsweek Article
I’d find his opinion on the security more compelling had he accomplished any of his goals instead of ending up face first on the ground under a polyester pig pile…

His opinions of security written before the fact don’t appear to match his experiences in the moment. There will always be a point far enough from the secure space that you can access weapons. What matters is whether you ever have a realistic chance of bringing those weapons to bear against the protectees. He appears not to have.

He didn’t even make it to the same floor as the event space. He ran in at a dead sprint, made it maybe a few tens of meters past the first hard checkpoint and got muckled on to.

Major event security has layers and depth that serve different purposes. The measure of efficacy is in the totality and the end result, not the performance of a single layer in isolation. The magnetometers existed to funnel traffic through a controlled perimeter checkpoint and force the discovery of weapons far enough out that it’s safe to do so. The security measures forced him to behave in a way that caused the threat to be detected and stopped successfully.
 
Is this a defined term in the RCMP doctrine?

Asking for a friend.

:giggle:
It seems to be "official" ...
... with this hilarious disclaimer: "Not to be confused police brutality, excessive force, unlawful force, police misconduct, anything else bad, wrong, or negative."
 
Having read the full manifesto now, there are a couple strange things.

Two of the more prominent being the very specific exclusion of Patel as a target, and thinking buckshot over slugs would somehow reduce collateral in a room full of people.
 
The PS from Allen's manifesto contains his observations of security at the event and it's not pretty.
Seems rather arrogant himself. Everything is expressed as an extreme: no, not, no-one. A bit of concern trolling thrown in.

Great monologing, though.
 
Interesting clarification question from a "60 Minutes" correspondent ...
"(on the basis that most people chose to attend a speech by a pedophile, rapist, and traitor, and are thus complicit)"

Yeah, hard to figure out who was giving that speech.
 
The latest: in court today, officially charged, back for bail/detention hearing Thursday - FBI affidavit attached.
 

Attachments

I find it interesting that both the President and VP were at the same event. I thought that was a no-no?

The Secret Service was very aware of how bad of an idea it was.

In fact, a massive number of the succession line was in attendance.

The incident has raised security questions, including over the line of succession. CNN previously reported that some Secret Service officials have been reluctant to have both the vice president and the president attend events together off the White House grounds.

Line of succession: Who was and was not at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner


1777333186438.png


Vance was also the first and fastest to be removed from the scene.

 
The latest: in court today, officially charged, back for bail/detention hearing Thursday - FBI affidavit attached.
Odd that he’s not charged with shooting the USSS agent. Blue on blue?

Vance was also the first and fastest to be removed from the scene.
Each protective detail would have its own resources and SOPs. Looks like POTUS’ is to hunker in place for the very brief time it takes to get several resources moving, like the counter-assault team, and then extract. Vance doesn’t have that, so his detail’s SOP is probably GTFO to a predetermined safe spot.
 
Each protective detail would have its own resources and SOPs. Looks like POTUS’ is to hunker in place for the very brief time it takes to get several resources moving, like the counter-assault team, and then extract. Vance doesn’t have that, so his detail’s SOP is probably GTFO to a predetermined safe spot.
Time to get four agents in place to carry him?
 
Each protective detail would have its own resources and SOPs. Looks like POTUS’ is to hunker in place for the very brief time it takes to get several resources moving, like the counter-assault team, and then extract. Vance doesn’t have that, so his detail’s SOP is probably GTFO to a predetermined safe spot.
This is exactly correct. And it appears to be lost on the bro influencer crowd who I would have expected to know some of these things.
 
For non-VIPs, the drill seems to be Duck and Cover.

1777388466530.jpeg
 
For non-VIPs, the drill seems to be Duck and Cover.

View attachment 100055
That would also be sound direction for police to give; it would make any attacker moving through the space more visible, and more easily able to be relatively safely engaged in the presence of a couple thousand bystanders. Very ugly space to have to fire shots in should it come to that.
 
Back
Top