pbi said:
I support the idea of bringing CAF Day onto November 11. IMHO, Remembrance Day is not adequately connected with the serving military: it is seen as a day for vets (God Bless) who served 50 or more years ago. This tends to obscure the fact that since the Korean War Canadians have served in all sorts of operations, including combat operations, and a number of them have been killed or injured. It also (again IMHO) obscures the fact that we have a military whose purpose is to be ready to take the same risks that our vets took, if the country asks it of us. In a decade or so, the majority of our "traditional" vets will be either dead or too old and sick to march: we have not produced a similar "surge" of veterans in the last five decades to fill the ranks of our Legions and ANAVETS, many of which are closing. If we integrate the two days, we can keep a critical mass of serving military people to keep Remembrance Day alive, while reminding the people of Canada what being in the military is really about. IMHO at the moment the serving military is a bit sensitive about being seen to steal Nov 11 from the "traditional" vets but I would argue that we are making an unnecessary distinction by having two separate days.
Cheers
With respect, I have to disagree ... the sole and quite sufficient purpose of Remembrance Day is to honour our war dead. The Act of Remembrance (Laurence Binyon; see: http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/FWWbinyon.htm ) is the central point*, in my personal opinion the
only point in having a public
celebration, and it is not about veterans, it is about those who did not survive long enough to be veterans.
We do, in my view, need a
military day: to honour veterans, with a fairly broad definition of that word, and serving members, regular and reserve. 6 June is not a bad choice but, maybe, a revitalized
Victoria Day would work, too.
There is, also, an argument that we should
celebrate two events on 1 July: just after dawn, in St. Johns, the
passion of the Royal Newfoundland Regiment at Beaumont Hamel (http://home.ca.inter.net/~cstephens/beaumont_hamel/ ) and, later in the day, the delight (I think that's the right word) we all take in being lucky enough to be Canadians or to be in Canada.
I think we do need to acknowledge the courage and sacrifice of veterans and soldiers, but I think we have, already, debased Remembrance Day enough. The Legion (not alone) has been trying to make it all about veterans; others, within and outside government, have been trying to make it a â Å“no more wars' day. It is, I suggest, about individuals, very select individuals, and their actions
in operations â “ not just declared wars. These individuals, mostly young men, were cut down in their prime and we should remember
them â Å“at the going down of the sun and in the morningâ ? for what the did, and for who they might have been ...
----------
* We have, also, tried to
gussy up In Flanders Fields and make it the 'point' but neither it nor the better (my opinion) Owen stacks up against the one verse by Binyon.
Anthem for Doomed Youth
Wilfred Owen
What passing-bells for these who die as cattle?
Only the monstrous anger of the guns.
Only the stuttering rifles' rapid rattle
Can patter out their hasty orisons.
No mockeries for them from prayers or bells,
Nor any voice of mourning save the choirs,â â€
The shrill, demented choirs of wailing shells;
And bugles calling for them from sad shires.
What candles may be held to speed them all?
Not in the hands of boys, but in their eyes
Shall shine the holy glimmers of good-byes.
The pallor of girls' brows shall be their pall;
Their flowers the tenderness of silent maids,
And each slow dusk a drawing-down of blinds.