Incorrect.
For strict infractions, the mere breach of the rule, with or without intention, constitutes guilt. For instance, speeding. It is irrelevant wether you intended to eceed the limit or not - you exceeded, you are guilty. In the military, I would use AWOl as an example. If you miss the ship sailing, the mere proof you were not there at the expiry of leave is sufficeint for a guilty verdict, regardless of your inten. (That is not to say you couldn't have a valid excuse, such as being in an accident that sent you to hospital - but those are defenses not part of the proof of intent which is not required for a guilty verdict)