• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

9mm Browning Replacement

  • Thread starter Thread starter rceme_rat
  • Start date Start date
Dragoon, sorry, I thought you were referring to the P7 pistol, I was skimming.

The PDW was mentioned earlier when Canada was discussing the PDW program, a project which has since been cancelled as I understand it. There was a thread awhile back about that.

SCM, There may be a future for FN‘s new designs, but logistics is a definite problem. Any NATO country will have a difficult time reorganizing around this cartridge. Maybe if the EU countries go ahead with their own organization, a new trial may be offered to compare modern designs.

These new calibre‘s are interesting and have potential. For now, I don‘t know if anyone has picked them up for military use as of yet, the Five SeVen and it‘s tactical sister the P 90 are being marketed in the US for Law Enforcement sales.
 
I have fired the P225 on a number of occasions, and it IS a fantastic sidearm. My ship was issued these about a year ago for NBP operations, along with the MP5... I must say that the Sig is miles ahead of the browning. In over 200 rounds fired through one weapon there were no problems! (Try to do that with the old Browning). One can only hope that these will become a CF wide replacement.
 
We keep beating around the ‘own personal firearm‘ bush repeatedly, but something I am not familiar with is your preference to a boot knife or the like. Are you issued a field knife in your kit or are you allowed personal preference to the knife you carry?
 
You‘re issued a bayonette. As for knife, a Gerber mutli-tool is part of your kit and a small personal knife doesn‘t hurt. I carried a Spyderco around at all time, in a back pocket, no one knew, I never offered.

I suggest you start another thread about this and see what kind of a response you get.
 
handguns are like women everyone has different tastes...

owning more then one Browning Hi-power I find nothing lacking on them, the fact that it's single action has never been a problem.
but I also own a Walther P99 and like that very much too, the double action is not too bad, it has a 3rd mode that once it's cocked you can lower the hammer to safe mode and then a very short trigger pull restores the internal hammer to full cocked, mush less trigger pull lenght then double action alone.
But nothing wroug with Sigs

Just say no to Glocks.....

some say 9mm over penitrate...  Ammo selection is key.  I think the FMJ restrictions are rather "stupid" in warfare, too long a thread for this...

Hertinburger made some dandy 9mm a few years back, not sure they still make it, it was a conical softpoint that was designed for good penitration, 100gr, 1400 fps
designed to penitrate car doors, etc    a little harder lead alloy then stadard softpoint. 9mm FL was it markings.

But I use some "expanding FMJ"  by Federal: some history... (not mine but posted elsewhere on the net) (notice the almost equal expansion on the 9mm vs the heavier 40s&w)

" In 1973 when I entered law enforcement, the newest, most controversial, bullet was Lee Jurras' SuperVel hollow and soft points for the .38SPL/357MAG, 9mm, .380 and .45 ACP. Lighter in weight than standard bullet weights, and at a much higher velocity, the theory behind the SuperVel said that increased expansion from the higher velocity translated into tissue destruction, which produced better incapacitation with less danger of excessive penetration. And for the next 27 years, virtually every bullet from every manufacturer was a variation on the same theme--hollowpoints were THE law enforcement bullet designs. The ammunition industry, at the urging of the law enforcement community, made bigger, smaller, soft/hollow, higher velocity, subsonic, plated, unplated, serrated jacket hollowpoints. Now familiar names such as Gold Dot, Hydra Shok, Silvertip, Black Talon, XTP, Tactical, Golden Sabre and so on, emerged from the marketing departments of the ammunition manufacturers, big and small. And each of these designs was heralded as an improvement over what had come before, and in many cases, were.

          These efforts continued at an even more frantic pace after the infamous Miami shootout involving the FBI against two very determined and well-armed suspects. That tragedy gave rise to what has become an accepted standard for ammunition that was established by the FBI in their 8-protocol performance criteria test. The law enforcement readership is familiar with these events that include bare 10% ordnance gelatin, gelatin with heavy clothing, wallboard, plywood, car window glass, car door metal. These media demonstrated for the first time what many experienced forensic ballistics investigators had known for some time but had never quantified. That bullets shot into bare gelatin, do not display the same expansion and penetration when fired through the practical media used in the FBI protocol.

          It was determined that while the hollowpoint was a clear improvement over what had existed before, and certainly improved officer survivability through increased wounding features, there still was a problem in consistent bullet performance of the traditional hollowpoint. And the causal factor for this inconsistency of performance was, as the FBI clearly demonstrated, the barrier that the bullet had to go through before it hit flesh. Some designs worked better than others. But the test barriers of clothing, wallboard and plywood contributed the most to the inconsistency of performance by the hollowpoint. And for a simple and quite apparent reason. The mechanism for expansion for any hollowpoint projectile is the hollow cavity. When it fills with tissue, expansion begins through a hydraulic effect against the wall of the hollow cavity. Expansion is usually facilitated through internal and external notching or jacket serrations. The result should be a uniformly expanded bullet with the core and jacket intact and arrayed in a symmetrical pattern of fins resembling a mushroom.

          That's the way it's supposed to be! But the FBI tests showed, and pathologists empirically proved, that when a hollowpoint projectile has to penetrate a barrier such as clothing, which a majority of criminals do wear, the mechanical function of the hollowpoint is impeded. The hollow cavity fills with clothing and precludes fluid filled tissue from exerting its influence on the interior walls of the cavity, and so what's produced is essentially a plugged hollowpoint that performs very similarly to a full metal jacketed bullet. It goes through the target with very little wounding effect, i.e. tissue destruction, and penetrates excessively. And the infamous term "stopping power" is diminished and danger to bystanders is increased. But the hollowpoint was a compromise and since it was a mechanical device and nothing mechanical works 100% of the time, it was accepted and adopted in the LE community as the best game in town, which it was until the emergence of the new Federal Cartridge Company's Expanding Full Metal Jacket (EFMJ) projectile.

EXPANDING FULL METAL JACKET (EFMJ)
          Over three years ago, the Research Group of Federal, under the leadership of Dave Longren, Bruce Warren and Larry Head, began a serious analysis of the performance of all hollowpoint bullets of every manufacturer, including Federal's Tactical and Hydra Shok. The validity of the FBI test protocol had long been established and with the assistance of the Law Enforcement and Military Sales division of Federal, which gathered actual shootings information from agencies, the need for a more consistent "through barrier" projectile became apparent. In a joint program with Tom Burczynski, of Experimental Research, Inc., Federal focused its efforts on the FBI events that included heavy clothing, plywood and wallboard. They knew that the hollowpoint had to be capped or covered, and yet achieve the expansion characteristics that the LE community demanded from current bullets. The solution became the new Expanding Full Metal Jacket (EFMJ) projectile that Federal introduced at the IALEFI and IACP conferences in the late fall of 1999.

BULLET DETAILS
          The EFMJ is not a variation of the classic hollowpoint. While some initial consideration was given to simply filling a hollowpoint with a material that would prevent plugging and yet allow expansion, tests proved this to be unworkable and inconsistent in performance. The design started literally from the bottom up. The bullet begins with a conventional copper jacket of a truncated cone design with a small flat nose or meplat. The interior of the jacket is heavily scored in a radial fashion. Inserted into the jacket nose is a rubber core or plug, followed by a lead core. The jacket is then "heeled" over at the base to hold the plug and core in place. Upon impact, the scored jacket flattens, and with the rubber plug sandwiched between the jacket nose and the lead core in the rear, expansion begins. And expansion is consistent and symmetrical.

          When I interviewed Bruce Warren, we spoke about its applicability to the wide range of weapons in today's LE arsenal. Federal tested the design through submachine guns, carbines and virtually every barrel length autopistol in use by the law enforcement community. The expansion characteristics remained consistent through gun type and barrier. With virtually every police agency of any size incorporating submachine guns into their tactical inventory, such as the MP-5 variants, and carbines, the performance of the typical pistol round was found in many cases to be somewhat lacking when driven at the longer barrel velocities of the shoulder weapons. Many of these bullets blew up and created surface wounds. The Expanding Full Metal Jacket overcomes these problems.

          While it seems we take questions of functionality for granted these days, I continue to hear about failures to feed with some handgun models, a problem that's exacerbated through poor shooting techniques. The EFMJ design is outwardly a full metal jacket. Its nose configuration facilitates feeding. When tested through my military Browning Hi-Power, which will not feed anything but FMJs, six magazines (84 rounds) fed flawlessly.
          The ammunition tested was production run 9mm +P 124-grain loads. We must remember that when

Gorge Luger designed his pistol in 1904, the 9mm Parabellum cartridge contained a 124-grain bullet. Since then, pistol manufacturers have continued to remind ammunition manufacturers that the camming surfaces, springs, magazine design and other features of 9mm pistols are designed for a 124-grain bullet at a muzzle velocity of 1120 feet per second (fps). While we have been extraordinarily successful in using bullet weights from 95 to 147 grains and at varying velocities in the 9mm, remember the cartridge was designed with a 124-grain projectile, which caused Federal to produce for their first Expanding Full Metal Jacket ammunition, in the 124-grain weight. Of course, other weights in 9mm are on the drawing board.

          Federal has also applied this design to the increasingly popular .40 S&W and the .45 ACP. Prototype designs are being finalized as this article is written. Bullet weights in the design phase for the .40 S&W included 155 and 165 grains, and in the .45 ACP 185 grains. Included in this article is a chart showing expansion, velocity and accuracy of the production/preproduction 9mm, .40 and AS ACP. All production and preproductions samples met the FBI minimum penetration criteria of 12 inches in the mediums tested.

          Questions are often raised about a new design's accuracy, which is somewhat surprising when the close ranges of actual gunfights are considered. I won't say the EFMJ is the most accurate 9mm bullet I've shot, but it's close. Consider the EFMJ's weight, jacket shape/configuration, the center of gravity and center of pressure, all of which determines whether some projectiles fly true and others don't. Federal, quite obviously, has the formula correct.

          This projectile should receive immediate and serious consideration by both law enforcement agencies and the military. Some departments in the U.S. are still required to use a non-hollowpointed projectile. The European police community has labored under similar prohibitions for many years and the EFMJ should be a natural for their considerations. "
  In 1973 when I entered law enforcement, the newest, most controversial, bullet was Lee Jurras' SuperVel hollow and soft points for the .38SPL/357MAG, 9mm, .380 and .45 ACP. Lighter in weight than standard bullet weights, and at a much higher velocity, the theory behind the SuperVel said that increased expansion from the higher velocity translated into tissue destruction, which produced better incapacitation with less danger of excessive penetration. And for the next 27 years, virtually every bullet from every manufacturer was a variation on the same theme--hollowpoints were THE law enforcement bullet designs. The ammunition industry, at the urging of the law enforcement community, made bigger, smaller, soft/hollow, higher velocity, subsonic, plated, unplated, serrated jacket hollowpoints. Now familiar names such as Gold Dot, Hydra Shok, Silvertip, Black Talon, XTP, Tactical, Golden Sabre and so on, emerged from the marketing departments of the ammunition manufacturers, big and small. And each of these designs was heralded as an improvement over what had come before, and in many cases, were.

          These efforts continued at an even more frantic pace after the infamous Miami shootout involving the FBI against two very determined and well-armed suspects. That tragedy gave rise to what has become an accepted standard for ammunition that was established by the FBI in their 8-protocol performance criteria test. The law enforcement readership is familiar with these events that include bare 10% ordnance gelatin, gelatin with heavy clothing, wallboard, plywood, car window glass, car door metal. These media demonstrated for the first time what many experienced forensic ballistics investigators had known for some time but had never quantified. That bullets shot into bare gelatin, do not display the same expansion and penetration when fired through the practical media used in the FBI protocol.

          It was determined that while the hollowpoint was a clear improvement over what had existed before, and certainly improved officer survivability through increased wounding features, there still was a problem in consistent bullet performance of the traditional hollowpoint. And the causal factor for this inconsistency of performance was, as the FBI clearly demonstrated, the barrier that the bullet had to go through before it hit flesh. Some designs worked better than others. But the test barriers of clothing, wallboard and plywood contributed the most to the inconsistency of performance by the hollowpoint. And for a simple and quite apparent reason. The mechanism for expansion for any hollowpoint projectile is the hollow cavity. When it fills with tissue, expansion begins through a hydraulic effect against the wall of the hollow cavity. Expansion is usually facilitated through internal and external notching or jacket serrations. The result should be a uniformly expanded bullet with the core and jacket intact and arrayed in a symmetrical pattern of fins resembling a mushroom.

          That's the way it's supposed to be! But the FBI tests showed, and pathologists empirically proved, that when a hollowpoint projectile has to penetrate a barrier such as clothing, which a majority of criminals do wear, the mechanical function of the hollowpoint is impeded. The hollow cavity fills with clothing and precludes fluid filled tissue from exerting its influence on the interior walls of the cavity, and so what's produced is essentially a plugged hollowpoint that performs very similarly to a full metal jacketed bullet. It goes through the target with very little wounding effect, i.e. tissue destruction, and penetrates excessively. And the infamous term "stopping power" is diminished and danger to bystanders is increased. But the hollowpoint was a compromise and since it was a mechanical device and nothing mechanical works 100% of the time, it was accepted and adopted in the LE community as the best game in town, which it was until the emergence of the new Federal Cartridge Company's Expanding Full Metal Jacket (EFMJ) projectile.

EXPANDING FULL METAL JACKET (EFMJ)
          Over three years ago, the Research Group of Federal, under the leadership of Dave Longren, Bruce Warren and Larry Head, began a serious analysis of the performance of all hollowpoint bullets of every manufacturer, including Federal's Tactical and Hydra Shok. The validity of the FBI test protocol had long been established and with the assistance of the Law Enforcement and Military Sales division of Federal, which gathered actual shootings information from agencies, the need for a more consistent "through barrier" projectile became apparent. In a joint program with Tom Burczynski, of Experimental Research, Inc., Federal focused its efforts on the FBI events that included heavy clothing, plywood and wallboard. They knew that the hollowpoint had to be capped or covered, and yet achieve the expansion characteristics that the LE community demanded from current bullets. The solution became the new Expanding Full Metal Jacket (EFMJ) projectile that Federal introduced at the IALEFI and IACP conferences in the late fall of 1999.

BULLET DETAILS
          The EFMJ is not a variation of the classic hollowpoint. While some initial consideration was given to simply filling a hollowpoint with a material that would prevent plugging and yet allow expansion, tests proved this to be unworkable and inconsistent in performance. The design started literally from the bottom up. The bullet begins with a conventional copper jacket of a truncated cone design with a small flat nose or meplat. The interior of the jacket is heavily scored in a radial fashion. Inserted into the jacket nose is a rubber core or plug, followed by a lead core. The jacket is then "heeled" over at the base to hold the plug and core in place. Upon impact, the scored jacket flattens, and with the rubber plug sandwiched between the jacket nose and the lead core in the rear, expansion begins. And expansion is consistent and symmetrical.

          When I interviewed Bruce Warren, we spoke about its applicability to the wide range of weapons in today's LE arsenal. Federal tested the design through submachine guns, carbines and virtually every barrel length autopistol in use by the law enforcement community. The expansion characteristics remained consistent through gun type and barrier. With virtually every police agency of any size incorporating submachine guns into their tactical inventory, such as the MP-5 variants, and carbines, the performance of the typical pistol round was found in many cases to be somewhat lacking when driven at the longer barrel velocities of the shoulder weapons. Many of these bullets blew up and created surface wounds. The Expanding Full Metal Jacket overcomes these problems.

          While it seems we take questions of functionality for granted these days, I continue to hear about failures to feed with some handgun models, a problem that's exacerbated through poor shooting techniques. The EFMJ design is outwardly a full metal jacket. Its nose configuration facilitates feeding. When tested through my military Browning Hi-Power, which will not feed anything but FMJs, six magazines (84 rounds) fed flawlessly.
          The ammunition tested was production run 9mm +P 124-grain loads. We must remember that when

Gorge Luger designed his pistol in 1904, the 9mm Parabellum cartridge contained a 124-grain bullet. Since then, pistol manufacturers have continued to remind ammunition manufacturers that the camming surfaces, springs, magazine design and other features of 9mm pistols are designed for a 124-grain bullet at a muzzle velocity of 1120 feet per second (fps). While we have been extraordinarily successful in using bullet weights from 95 to 147 grains and at varying velocities in the 9mm, remember the cartridge was designed with a 124-grain projectile, which caused Federal to produce for their first Expanding Full Metal Jacket ammunition, in the 124-grain weight. Of course, other weights in 9mm are on the drawing board.

          Federal has also applied this design to the increasingly popular .40 S&W and the .45 ACP. Prototype designs are being finalized as this article is written. Bullet weights in the design phase for the .40 S&W included 155 and 165 grains, and in the .45 ACP 185 grains. Included in this article is a chart showing expansion, velocity and accuracy of the production/preproduction 9mm, .40 and AS ACP. All production and preproductions samples met the FBI minimum penetration criteria of 12 inches in the mediums tested.

          Questions are often raised about a new design's accuracy, which is somewhat surprising when the close ranges of actual gunfights are considered. I won't say the EFMJ is the most accurate 9mm bullet I've shot, but it's close. Consider the EFMJ's weight, jacket shape/configuration, the center of gravity and center of pressure, all of which determines whether some projectiles fly true and others don't. Federal, quite obviously, has the formula correct.

          This projectile should receive immediate and serious consideration by both law enforcement agencies and the military. Some departments in the U.S. are still required to use a non-hollowpointed projectile. The European police community has labored under similar prohibitions for many years and the EFMJ should be a natural for their considerations.



 
some pics of the Federal Expanding FMJ....  sorry for the long pervous post, but good infor I think
 
Ghost778 said:
I see your point about safty but on operations, save for MPs, we never have a round in the chamber so to me that makes the issue of having a safty on the firearm a mute one.

::)

And your basis for this is?


 
On two of the three operations I served on, we had a round in the chamber and weapon on safe in the holster while out and about.   Same with rifles.   On return to a secure area, the weapons were cleared.   On two of the operations, the weapon was cleared and a loaded mag was placed on the rifle/pistol while in camp.   Not sure where you get your information about how we do things on operations.  A safety is an important feature particularly as we don't want to be stuck with a triple retention police style holster.  My Eagle SAS IV Airborne and Safariland 6004 will do just fine thanks....

Jeff
 
OMG a C&L'd pistol

DownloadAttach.asp


::)
 
Here's a little story about the 9mm Brownings we currently use... not 100% sure of the validity, may be an urban legend, but I've heard it a number of times...

Supposedly, when first evaluating the Brownings, the Canadian army stripped two pistols, buried the parts in a bucket of sand, retrievd the parts, reassembled the weapons (Without cleaning), and then proceeded to fire the weapons, without stoppages.

Not a lot of weapons that can brag that...
 
Just a Sig Op said:
Here's a little story about the 9mm Brownings we currently use... not 100% sure of the validity, may be an urban legend, but I've heard it a number of times...

Supposedly, when first evaluating the Brownings, the Canadian army stripped two pistols, buried the parts in a bucket of sand, retrievd the parts, reassembled the weapons (Without cleaning), and then proceeded to fire the weapons, without stoppages.

Not a lot of weapons that can brag that...

The version I heard was that the Australian Army did a test like this, to simulate muddy conditions.
Pistol was dropped in a bucket of mud then removed - barrel cleaned out for safety and then fired.

I'm happiest when I've got both a pistol and a rifle (C7, C8 - I don't care) - just wish I had a shotgun to back them all up ... (it's just one of those idiosyncrasies of mine ... "when you need a 9mm flashlight, it's nice to have a 12 gauge floodlight, too ...")
 
Just before boarding ops the teams will always chamber a round in their P225s.
 
Morpheus32 said:
A safety is an important feature particularly as we don't want to be stuck with a triple retention police style holster.

Errmmm...?  A Level 3 holster is designed to assist in weapon retention while it's in the holster, nothing about it replaces a physical safety mechanism on a weapon holstered in it.  I'm not sure what you mean by being "stuck" with a Level 3, but if you're concerned about draw time I can guarantee you it's not an issue unless you're wearing mittens.
 
garb811 said:
Errmmm...?   A Level 3 holster is designed to assist in weapon retention while it's in the holster, nothing about it replaces a physical safety mechanism on a weapon holstered in it.   I'm not sure what you mean by being "stuck" with a Level 3, but if you're concerned about draw time I can guarantee you it's not an issue unless you're wearing mittens.

Errmmmm?  Combat troops are not police and don't need triple retention.  A tactical holster is more than sufficent.  Draw time is not vital ground for combat troops in general.  There are some people, in some units that it is an issue but the average joe needs a comfortable and useful holster.  As I said, I will stick with my Eagle SAS IV Airborne which I carried in Somalia, Bosnia and Afghanistan.  If you need extra retention, the airborne variant has a strap that goes over the heel to keep the pistol firmly in place.  I used this during a couple of air assaults. 

Some of the latest retention holsters might be suitable in the field but most are designed for police in mind and not combat operations.  As was my main point of my post (not the particular holster design), a safety is an important component of the service pistol.  The Browning is a good gun.  We have other things we should be spending out money on before we start replacing the Browning.  It would be nice to replace the Browning but we don't NEED to replace the Browning right now.  We have other priorities.

Jeff 
 
Morpheus32 said:
Combat troops are not police and don't need triple retention.   A tactical holster is more than sufficent.   Draw time is not vital ground for combat troops in general.   There are some people, in some units that it is an issue but the average joe needs a comfortable and useful holster.   As I said, I will stick with my Eagle SAS IV Airborne which I carried in Somalia, Bosnia and Afghanistan.   If you need extra retention, the airborne variant has a strap that goes over the heel to keep the pistol firmly in place.   I used this during a couple of air assaults.  

Some of the latest retention holsters might be suitable in the field but most are designed for police in mind and not combat operations.   As was my main point of my post (not the particular holster design), a safety is an important component of the service pistol.
Jeff  

Well, as long as we're on the topic of holsters ... the one I'm using has three layers of retention - the outer one includes a flap, for when you don't want it to snag on brush/whatever - the middle one is a simple strap over the hammer - the inner strap goes over the butt (of the pistol, not mine ... you perverts!) and can be disengaged simply by pressing down with the thumb while gripping the pistol - a relatively low tech quickdraw release, for an amateur like me.  It's a thigh rig, and much better than the issue Bianchi with rigid extender that's a nuisance when you're trying to sit down while wearing body armour, etc.

As for the Browning - we had an amusing experience when some village elders asked if they could compare our pistols - they politely hefted the Glocks the Norwegians were using, but ... they offered me quite a bit in exchange for my Browning (chuckle - three for one, actually!)
It's funny - I'd never anticipated that a properly maintained/cleaned weapon would have so much more resale value ... haha!
 
I love the Glock and train with it about once a week right now...I don't know if its the best choice for a service weapon though. Its not nearly as robust as some of the other weapons out there and I'm not sure it could stand up to the same amount of harsh treatment that the Browning does.

Also the safeties are mechanical, rather than applied on the Glock.

Slim :D
 
I agree that in most of the situations Cbt Arms are likely to face, a triple retention system is not required.   Having said that, given the amount of dismounted patrolling going on in urban areas on our latest missions, it wouldn't be a bad thing.   I was, and still am, confused as to how you were relating a Level 3 holster as a replacement to a physical safety on a weapon so I was trying, obviously poorly, to clarify where you were going with the issue.  
 
Sorry...My mistake. I was not commenting on the holster. I am not at all knowledgable about them and so have no place to comment on one. The only holster I use, or know anything about,  is the strong-side draw high-ride one made for the Glock 17 by KYDEX.

Its flat, very concealable (on someone of my size anyway) and seems to hold the weapon pretty securely. Bear in mind though that my application is for close protection work, not LE or soldiering. Not sure if it makes a difference (Bet it does) but, believe it or not, a quick draw is sometimes required in this line of work.

Sorry for the confusion. I will reread the posts with an eye for more detail.

Cheers all.

Slim
 
Slim:  Sorry, now I have you confused as well.  I was replying to Morpheus.  My apologies.
 
Back
Top