
Unless they already overmatch any likely near-peer enough that the near-peers are all seriously worried that the 90% is more than sufficient to allow the 10% to chew their mechanized forces to pieces.
The US obviously divides its total platforms among various types (F, B, A, C, etc). Which near-peer forces the US is likely to fight are of a size that would put pressure on the US to downsize the As?I assure you that nobody in the USAF thinks actual near-peer is this easy. Jingoism is not a substitute for military competence.
The US obviously divides its total platforms among various types (F, B, A, C, etc). Which near-peer forces the US is likely to fight are of a size that would put pressure on the US to downsize the As?
A-10s aren't a "10% handicap". They're part of a mix. Eventually they will be fully retired. There will still be a mix.Not sure what that has to do with anything. Feel free to explain.
A-10s aren't a "10% handicap". They're part of a mix. Eventually they will be fully retired. There will still be a mix.
In defence of @YZT 's position that the future is catching up to the A-10
![]()
France tests MQ-9 Reaper for drone intercept role
France’s Air and Space Force has successfully carried out its first anti-drone missile test from an MQ-9 Reaper, using a Hellfire missile to engage an aerial drone target. The test took place on April 2 at the military range ondefence-blog.com
Hellfires from Reapers.
Given that the APKWS II was developed as the low cost alternative to the Hellfire for the AH-64, and uses the same guidance system, I think it is safe to assume that the Hellfires on the Reaper could be swapped out for 4 or 7 packs of the APKWS II.
As the article states, it's potentially down to the fight in the Indo-Pacific not being suitable for the aircraft. If you're doing lots of fighting in Africa against people in flip-flops, the Skyraider II makes sense. Against the Chinese, across vast expanses of ocean, not so much.SOCOM
Trading in crewed fixed wing CAS for more drones of all groups.
![]()
SOCOM Cuts Back on OA-1K, Wants 100 Drones to Go with MQ-9
U.S. Special Operations Command is shifting its aviation plans to favor more drone swarms and fewer militarized crop-dusters.www.airandspaceforces.com
As the article states, it's potentially down to the fight in the Indo-Pacific not being suitable for the aircraft. If you're doing lots of fighting in Africa against people in flip-flops, the Skyraider II makes sense. Against the Chinese, across vast expanses of ocean, not so much.
UAS are great, but having real people on scene is always more effective if you can afford to reasonably risk those people.
Fair enough, but from an economic perspective and operational, how much do you gain from a having a well paid pilot sit on the ground and have less awareness vs. a well paid pilot in a modified crop duster on scene with more awareness?From my standpoint the issue is how much can be found out by other means before we have to commit those people to the task.
I am not against crewed craft. Far from it. I expect that there will be people in every conflict. Only people make war.
But I want the machines to do the uncovering. the shapimg and the supporting, in so far as they can.