• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

A Deeply Fractured US

OK, then - maybe now I'M wearing the papist foil hat?

So far, the info-machine for Big Catholic Church seems to be leaning toward this guy.

I'm seeing this narrative track out there, now ....

Could only the crustiest, most jaded of political cynics consider all this even the tiniest move in this direction?

Now, technically, if he reportedly came >>>this<<< close to converting, my understanding is that he can't be declared a saint. Still, there may be some wiggle room out there:
I'm far from being a theological scholar, and am closer to an atheist than an agnostic, but from what little I saw of Kirk's public positions, he struck me as very much an Old Testament, literal-interpretation Evangelical type of Christian. I'm quite surprised anyone within the current Catholic church would find much common ground with him.
 
Except people aren’t forests and those people drag everyone else into the mix.

Easier to deradicalize than it is to try and let them ‘burn out’. Address why they have issues and usually the cause dies on it’s own.

The US would really benefit from a third political party which doesn’t cater to the extremists on both ends. Unfortunately with their defacto two party system it captures way more people under one umbrella than it really should and it gives way more power to a small but vocal minority than it should.
I used to think that.

Then we got France. A country used to one party ruling or the other party ruling. then we got Macron who came in and crushed the socialists and Republicans parties leading to his centrist bloc that is now being squeezed on their flanks by more extreme versions of the Republicans and socialists, all having around the same number of seats in parliament.

Putting in a third party in a system not designed for one ends up breaking the system.
 
Suffice to say, the democrats are the ones that don't give a shit about freedom of speech.

I find both sides are attacking freedom of speech while claiming to be it's sole champion. Trumps saving grace, if you could call it that, is what you mentioned earlier. He doesn’t hide his efforts to circumvent or attack free speech. He just goes full send.

Ideally Republicans can rise above 'its our turn', where democrats under Biden failed.

There are a whole bunch of liberals and conservatives who had that same attitude in Germany when the red shirts and brown shirts were battling it out in the streets.
That's a great point. They failed to take decisive action when the brown shirts and red shirts were otherwise preoccupied and ended up becoming irrelevant. You could even say their failure to act supported Hitlers rise to power.
 
I'm far from being a theological scholar, and am closer to an atheist than an agnostic, but from what little I saw of Kirk's public positions, he struck me as very much an Old Testament, literal-interpretation Evangelical type of Christian. I'm quite surprised anyone within the current Catholic church would find much common ground with him.
Pretty strong pro-life lean plus some of his "enough of this modern shit" tone might be appealing to the crustiest conservative wings of Big Vatican, maybe?
 
I'm seeing this narrative track out there, now ....

Even Alex Jones is calling that crazy!!

 
I'm far from being a theological scholar, and am closer to an atheist than an agnostic, but from what little I saw of Kirk's public positions, he struck me as very much an Old Testament, literal-interpretation Evangelical type of Christian. I'm quite surprised anyone within the current Catholic church would find much common ground with him.
Just spotted this as well from the broader Catholic info-machine ....
Seems to glide around POTUS47's more Old Testament-y revenge "hate my opponent" bits, even after quoting the widow and the Veep telling the crowd to love their enemies.
 
I'm far from being a theological scholar, and am closer to an atheist than an agnostic, but from what little I saw of Kirk's public positions, he struck me as very much an Old Testament, literal-interpretation Evangelical type of Christian. I'm quite surprised anyone within the current Catholic church would find much common ground with him.
He attended a denomination that was a Pentecostal off-shoot. Very much not Catholic.
 
I used to think that.

Then we got France. A country used to one party ruling or the other party ruling. then we got Macron who came in and crushed the socialists and Republicans parties leading to his centrist bloc that is now being squeezed on their flanks by more extreme versions of the Republicans and socialists, all having around the same number of seats in parliament.

Putting in a third party in a system not designed for one ends up breaking the system.
They are breaking apart in France due to Macrons poor decision to dissolve government when he didn’t have to. He could have kept his moderate government and pushed the reforms needed but because of his own stupidity they are now extremely fractured.

Odds are if he had waited he would have been able to shift the balance one way or the other by addressing issues. Instead he threw a election in there and basically killed their ability to fix anything well taking all the blame.

Very different from why America is fracturing.

A moderate party in America would force the other two (or at least one of them) to tone down to attract the middle which is where most votes are. The one which remains extreme would likely fade away to nothing.
 
So Carr's actions won't be officially scrutinized (maybe).

Kimmel makes it back on the air.

Much ado about nothing.
 
They are breaking apart in France due to Macrons poor decision to dissolve government when he didn’t have to. He could have kept his moderate government and pushed the reforms needed but because of his own stupidity they are now extremely fractured.

Odds are if he had waited he would have been able to shift the balance one way or the other by addressing issues. Instead he threw a election in there and basically killed their ability to fix anything well taking all the blame.

Very different from why America is fracturing.

A moderate party in America would force the other two (or at least one of them) to tone down to attract the middle which is where most votes are. The one which remains extreme would likely fade away to nothing.
If all the moderates end up in the center, and all that's left of the fringes are the AOCs and MTG, do you foresee a lot in terms of compromise?
 
Pretty strong pro-life lean plus some of his "enough of this modern shit" tone might be appealing to the crustiest conservative wings of Big Vatican, maybe?
But I don't think crusty conservatives have been much in favour in the Vatican the past few years.

eems to glide around POTUS47's more Old Testament-y revenge "hate my opponent" bits, even after quoting the widow and the Veep telling the crowd to love their enemies.
Vance's Catholicism is fairly well established but I've never been convinced that Trump's profession of faith is anything other then political pandering to his base.


Guess the ratings didn’t suck quite enough to keep him off air …
Of they got a little spooked that Disney stock went down about 7% since he was suspended.
 
Guess the ratings didn’t suck quite enough to keep him off air …
If the cost of his show is comparable to Colbert's, they're losing millions annually. ABC might be miscalculating: if the people threatening boycotts are mostly not already consuming the product in the first place, caving gains very little. (They won't be the first to make the miscalculation in judging whether to bend to left-activist pressure.)

ABC can put the offering back in its time slot, but they can't compel affiliates not to pre-empt with their own programming. Sinclair has already indicated it will continue to do so, absent Kimmel meeting conditions they have set.

Media owners (TV, papers, etc) have shown remarkable tolerance these past few years for taking losses on behalf of egos in the departments that produce content, but not indefinite tolerance.
 
If the cost of his show is comparable to Colbert's, they're losing millions annually. ABC might be miscalculating: if the people threatening boycotts are mostly not already consuming the product in the first place, caving gains very little. (They won't be the first to make the miscalculation in judging whether to bend to left-activist pressure.)

ABC can put the offering back in its time slot, but they can't compel affiliates not to pre-empt with their own programming. Sinclair has already indicated it will continue to do so, absent Kimmel meeting conditions they have set.

Media owners (TV, papers, etc) have shown remarkable tolerance these past few years for taking losses on behalf of egos in the departments that produce content, but not indefinite tolerance.
Doesn't matter what losses ABC takes.

Is Disney was the collateral damage here, that's the kicker.

Star wars, Marvel, Disney proper, that's a loss they cannot stomach. A boycott there costs the parent company hundreds of millions.
 
Back
Top