Observing and recording police is not ‘harassing’ them. It’s the right of a person in a free society oblong as police are not obstructed from doing their jobs. I see no evidence these ones were. She literally tried to wave their vehicle around and there was ample room to do so.So nothing better to do in the middle of the day, harass law enforcement and follow them around.
Following police is not illegal.
None of these things, regardless, factor into the legal authority of a police officer to use deadly force.
It matters a very great deal, and claiming it doesn’t just shows how utterly unqualified you are here. Establishing their identity as police and establishing that they were acting lawfully in the course of duties they are permitted to carry out is easential, like, utterly fucking essential in determining if those officers were giving lawful commands and if they were lawfully placed as it pertains to what they did next. They were attempting to detain her and the lawfulness of that detention will be very important. It would be the difference between avoiding criminal responsibility, and a murder cherge.This doesn't matter.
This was irrelevant to the individual officer’s decision to use deadly force, or the legality thereof.She chose to be there in the first place, she decided to loaf around ICE agents.
Yes. Like voting, or saying “fuck the police”, It’s actually a right. The exercising of that right is also irrelevant to the individual officer’s decision to use deadly force, or the legality thereof.Observing is a personal choice.
The dead mother of three who was shot in the face by police is the result. That is not ‘irrelevant’. That is the entire point of this. Police are accountable for articulating the force we use and only doing so lawfully. When someone is killed because of police incompetence, accountability must follow. It will- civilly, at a minimum. Possibly criminally but I suspect the administration will prevent that happening.I don't care about the result, that's irrelevant. She had nothing better to do and ended up in that situation under her own free will.
Police shooting someone dead is never “irrelevant”, and will in most cases be the single most significant aspect of any situation. If you think otherwise I just don’t know what to say.She was a loser and had no reason to be there. This was corroborated by the statement from her family. Being shot in the face was irrelevant, that was one out of many outcomes.
False. I very rarely say anything like, or the admins would have turfed me long ago. When I do so, it’s with good reason. You would be utterly temperamentally unsuitable for policing in our part of the world and I’m glad that’s not an option you pursued. If you choose not to engage with me because this is pointed out, that’s fine, but I will not be ignoring your posts if they need to be challenged . Up to you if you reply or not. Not the first time someone on this site has declared they’re ignoring me, won’t be the last.You always have to get a personal attack in whenever you disagree with someone. A sign of true intelligence. I'm done with you.

