• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

A Deeply Fractured World

My own thoughts on the subject:

The America we have known—rooted in shared values, civic unity, and a belief in upward mobility—is lost forever, not through a single catastrophe, but through a slow erosion of trust, truth, and identity. Once bound by a common narrative of freedom and opportunity, the nation now finds itself fractured along political, cultural, and economic lines so deep they seem irreversible.
That was conservative America. In the end, "turn-the-other-cheek" Republicans lost the voters when the assaults of the political left on most of the pillars (constitution, courts, police, military, religion, family, etc) became unendurable. What's puzzling is the amount of blame aimed at the average conservative-leaning American and not the political factions who worked tirelessly for decades to establish their own corrosive narratives and priorities in the schools, universities, public agencies, media, entertainment, etc.
The Trump presidency marked a dramatic turning point.
What turned was the emergence of conservative voters willing to abide by the TTPs of the political left being used against the political left. For some reason, suddenly the world ended. Why didn't it end much earlier when the political left became so egregiously dishonest and overbearing?
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which should have led a coordinated federal pandemic response
Kind of a conveniently fuzzy recollection that omits the behaviour of Democrats who advocated against trusting vaccines...right up until they won the presidential election. That particular thing is one example of many: It. Was. Always. Politics. First.

To lose sight of that is to be incapable of correctly identifying the root causes of this mess.
 
My own thoughts on the subject:

The America we have known—rooted in shared values, civic unity, and a belief in upward mobility—is lost forever, not through a single catastrophe, but through a slow erosion of trust, truth, and identity. Once bound by a common narrative of freedom and opportunity, the nation now finds itself fractured along political, cultural, and economic lines so deep they seem irreversible.

Technology, once heralded as a democratizing force, has accelerated division. Social media algorithms feed outrage and misinformation, replacing national discourse with tribalism. Institutions that once commanded broad respect—Congress, the press, the justice system—have become arenas for partisan warfare. The very concept of objective truth has eroded, replaced by curated realities that affirm individual biases.

The Trump presidency marked a dramatic turning point. Donald Trump’s rise exploited and widened existing fault lines, transforming politics into spectacle and loyalty tests. His unapologetic attacks on the media, judiciary, intelligence community, and even the electoral process normalized institutional distrust. More dangerously, Trump helped mainstream a deep skepticism—if not outright hostility—toward science and expertise. During the COVID-19 pandemic, he publicly mocked scientists, contradicted health guidelines, and elevated conspiracy theories, contributing to avoidable deaths and permanent damage to public confidence in science.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which should have led a coordinated federal pandemic response, was marginalized and undermined. Political appointees attempted to rewrite scientific reports and silence public health officials. Experts were pushed aside in favor of ideologues who minimized the severity of the crisis, exposing the fragility of America’s public health infrastructure.

Trump also appointed individuals with little to no experience to powerful positions, prioritizing loyalty over competence. Key departments like Education, the Environment, and Homeland Security were led by figures who often opposed the missions of their own agencies. This erosion of institutional integrity weakened domestic governance and diminished America’s standing abroad.

Trump’s treatment of longstanding American allies further accelerated the nation’s loss of global respect. He openly berated leaders of NATO countries, questioned the value of mutual-defense commitments, and demanded loyalty tests of nations that had stood beside the United States for generations. Traditional partners such as Canada, Germany, France, and the United Kingdom were subjected to public insults and erratic diplomatic behavior, undermining trust built over decades. By treating alliances as transactional and adversarial, Trump destabilized the cooperative frameworks that had underpinned global security since World War II, leaving allies uncertain and adversaries emboldened.

On the world stage, this broader disregard for diplomacy fractured relationships and allowed rivals to expand their influence. Withdrawals from the Paris Climate Accord, the Iran nuclear deal, and other international commitments signaled a retreat from leadership and reliability. America's reputation as a steady, principled global partner was replaced by unpredictability and unilateralism.

Perhaps most disturbingly, Trump attempted to wield the Department of Justice as a political weapon. He pressured DOJ officials to investigate critics, interfere in prosecutions, and challenge election results. His attempts to use the courts to punish adversaries reflected authoritarian instincts that threatened the rule of law.

Economically, the American Dream has faltered. For many, upward mobility has become a myth, as wages stagnate and generational wealth gaps widen. The social contract—work hard, play by the rules, and succeed—feels broken.

Most profoundly, the American sense of we—a shared national identity—has fractured into us versus them. Without a unifying narrative, even patriotism has become contested.

This is not to say America cannot adapt or evolve. But the version many remember—confident, cohesive, and united in purpose—is gone. What replaces it remains uncertain, but the old America, for better or worse, is lost to history, lost to her allies, and worst of all, lost to her people.
Beautiful - thank you for writing this.
 
There's a specific turning point in all the polling that you can identify when America broke. 2003. Before the invasion of Iraq most polls said America was moving in the right direction.. Post-invasion Americans haven't had a single year where those polls said the country was moving in the right direction.

Iraq is the gift that keeps on giving. And unfortunately all the people involved in selling that terrible decision were mostly rehabilitated in public. Just imagine what the trillions wasted on Iraq could have done for the average American. Or how Afghanistan would have turned out if the Americans weren't distracted with Iraq.
 
I think you’ve drank a bit too much of the kool-aide if you think his net worth has dropped since taking office.

Just imagine what his feed is like to come to the conclusion that the dude selling crypto before swearing in is less corrupt than his predecessors. The algorithm can really mess you up if you lack basic media literacy and critical thinking.
 
The irony of "we will never trust you again" is that I've felt that way about several European countries (France at the top of the list) for decades. None of them have been rehabilitated by the mere election of Trump.

The problem with "we don't trust X anymore" is that it prompts comparisons with "Y" and "Z". How did we feel about them before? And now?

That some have lost trust in the US (Trump) doesn't mean we ought to lose all trust (in the US). And the US could lose some trustworthiness and still retain more than a large tranche of other countries. Ironically, this should be supposed to be the case because the US system of government is less susceptible to revolutionary change. That some people spend so much time bitching about how hard it is to really change anything is proof of that, and if they at the same time are trying to spin up stories about permanent changes they are blowing wind out both ends.
 
Most US voters probably don't care much about abstract things like the advantages of owning the de facto international currency, or the fate of a country like Ukraine that not too long ago was regarded as being not much less corrupt than Russia.

Objections to what Trump has done ought not to sound so much like the grievers are projecting their own worries as "concerns" for the welfare of the US. Also they ought not to characterize "the US" as being the root of their discomfort. The number of people who support Trump and Trump's policies is a decided minority which temporarily has the support of enough independents to make it look like a majority.

Mostly what I hear are the lamentations of elites suddenly confronted with large new spending requirements.
‘Most US voters’ don’t understand the massive positives of having the world reserve currency because of the simple fact that their own political class doesn’t want them to understand.
If the price of oil was no longer priced in USD but in EURO or Yen or back in Sterling, they’d understand pretty fucking quick.
If the world payment system wasn’t in USD but in Rupees or Rubles, again they’d understand damn quick.
Ignorance is bliss they say and is no one more blissful than an American.
 
‘Most US voters’ don’t understand the massive positives of having the world reserve currency because of the simple fact that their own political class doesn’t want them to understand.
If the price of oil was no longer priced in USD but in EURO or Yen or back in Sterling, they’d understand pretty fucking quick.
If the world payment system wasn’t in USD but in Rupees or Rubles, again they’d understand damn quick.
Ignorance is bliss they say and is no one more blissful than an American.
If the USD stops being the "world reserve currency", then a large chunk of USD circulating abroad - about 45% of all USD in circulation, in the neighbourhood of $1T - will be orphaned. The US has already pocketed the gains from printing and spending that money. The "pretty fucking quick" realization would fall on many, many non-Americans. I suppose it in fact already has, and that efforts to swings away from the USD will meet a lot of resistance from Very Serious People.

[Add: whatever currency people use to buy oil, they have to have that currency, which means they either need to buy it from someone else - hoping that not everyone has the same need at the same time - or increase their exports to whichever country prints it. Good luck massively spinning up exports to China, Russia, or India.]
 
If the USD stops being the "world reserve currency", then a large chunk of USD circulating abroad - about 45% of all USD in circulation, in the neighbourhood of $1T - will be orphaned. The US has already pocketed the gains from printing and spending that money. The "pretty fucking quick" realization would fall on many, many non-Americans. I suppose it in fact already has, and that efforts to swings away from the USD will meet a lot of resistance from Very Serious People.
lol.
Ask El Salvador.
Those Very Serious People are moving themselves into Crypto.
 
lol.
Ask El Salvador.
Those Very Serious People are moving themselves into Crypto.
Better not lose their keys.

Meanwhile I'm looking forward to hearing the arguments of the people who think elevating China or Russia is an acceptable solution.
 
I did skim it, nothing jumped out. Is he committing crimes? Is this like the Nancy Pelosi scenario?
You made an erroneous claim. You were given receipts. Something you are quite good at avoiding.

Nothing beyond your worldview that isn’t consistent. It lessens your position and your credibility on any of this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ytz
You made an erroneous claim. You were given receipts. Something you are quite good at avoiding.

Nothing beyond your worldview that isn’t consistent. It lessens your position and your credibility on any of this.

I thank you (again), Remius, for correcting my understanding. I am now aware that Trump org has reversed prior losses in wealth while DJT was serving as #45. Anything else you'd like to bicker about?
 
I thank you (again), Remius, for correcting my understanding. I am now aware that Trump org has reversed prior losses in wealth while DJT was serving as #45. Anything else you'd like to bicker about?
You made the claim. Not my fault you are wrong about it.
 
I wasn't tracking that. Thanks. He is a better businessman than I thought, and this kind of flies in the face of all the "he's terrible at business" narrative.
“Captive market” is such a harsh term …

The business he seems to be best at is enriching himself & his family/friends via public office. Not an optimal look for any political leader.

But hey, maybe I missed the memes talking about how much more Clinton & Obama were worth after their presidencies praising them for being such great businessmen.
 
Back
Top