Bzzliteyr said:
Understood, but the term "study" can be fairly broad. I'd rather a student be allowed time to study in a comfortable environment that be forced to participate in an environment that they are bullied or don't feel safe in.
That makes sense about the bullying. I'm not sure how it is now but from my own personal experience in a co-ed gym class most of the females (and some males too) would basically stand there and say this is fucking stupid the whole period. Didn't lift a finger to get involved and they would still pass.
Is it fair to give these kids a credit in gym if they don't physically partake in the gym class? Is it fair for the teacher to have to go above and beyond the normal lesson plans and come up with independent studies for students, and extra work and time grading them?
Why not just remove them from "gym" and put them in another subject they can partake in?
Bzzliteyr said:
Jarnhamar, I understand all your replies.
The thing that gets me and I saw a post about on Facebook is a tweet that sums it up (and I have to paraphrase because I can't find it)
"You've been sharing bathrooms with gays, transgendered people your whole life, you just didn't know it, this isn't a new thing"
Bruce Monkhouse said:
Yup,...so who is making it an issue?? Hmmm....
Thanks Bzzliteyr.
I'm leaning towards Bruce on this one. Who's making it an issue if it's been going on for years?
I don't think the issue is so much the bathroom. The Royal Canadian Dragoons have shared bathrooms in their shacks and there doesn't seem to be any issues. (Though I can see see young adults being uncomfortable in shared bathrooms).
I'd guess the issue is more about change rooms and showers.
Bzzliteyr said:
Well, the LGBTQ community and some normal people are looking at things in life and asking "why do we have to have ladies and mens washrooms?" "Why do we need to have boys and girls toys?" "Why do I have to be a boy or a girl? Can't I just be human?" Others were born as boys but feel better and safer and confident identifying as a girl. So what? How does it change anything if they identify that way?
I'd say it's over looking the humans that DO identify with being male or female and risking marginalizing them. I've seen a number of comments online where people are saying "the tables have turned, how do you like it?!".
Having "the tables turn" isn't a positive outcome.
Do biological males or females who don't feel comfortable sharing change rooms and facilities with members of the oposite sex no longer get a say? Is their feelings on the issue unimportant?
I find the whole thing ironic considering we seem to accept segregation based on gender for religious purposes.
Female only swimming time schedules so they won't show their bodies to males.
Males likewise making demands about not having women present, for religious reasons. (can't think of an example off the top of my head)
I'm waiting for the biological male who identifies as female to fight to be in a religious-prompted women only environment.
Not being insensitive but could we be going a bit overboard with this gender and lifestyle stuff?
Agender, genderless, androgyne, bigender, cisgender, cissexual, genderqueer, intersex, non-binary, pangender, trigender, Third gender/Third sex, Trans man, Trans woman etc..