• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

All Things First Nations - CF help, protests, solutions, residential schools, etc. (merged)

Let's not even get into the fact that she appointed her common law husband as Band Manager.........nepotism at it's finest......but just a wee bit of conflict of interest. I wonder what he drives?

So many of her band mates are living 3 families to a constructon trailer, or in shacks that are tarped....and she's drving an Escalade.....
 
Bluebulldog said:
Let's not even get into the fact that she appointed her common law husband as Band Manager.........nepotism at it's finest......but just a wee bit of conflict of interest. I wonder what he drives?

So many of her band mates are living 3 families to a constructon trailer, or in shacks that are tarped....and she's drving an Escalade.....

I guess from the interviews I have seen with some of the residents from the reserve, it is common that members of the band council look after their family's first with the best jobs, best housing and the other no so lucky get the scraps. This is unfortunately happening on other reserves as well.

They do have a lot of problems, but most of them are their own making with mismanagement. They need to take responsibility for their own actions.
 
Stupid question then: why have they not voted her out? Is it a case of her having more numbers on her side? I'm serious. If enough families are supposedly living 2-3 to a construction trailer while she drives her Caddy then voting her out would be a no brainer.

Or do we go back to the fact that she's a bully and trust that she coerces and threatens those that do not tow the line?
 
Scott said:
Stupid question then: why have they not voted her out? Is it a case of her having more numbers on her side? I'm serious. If enough families are supposedly living 2-3 to a construction trailer while she drives her Caddy then voting her out would be a no brainer.

Or do we go back to the fact that she's a bully and trust that she coerces and threatens those that do not tow the line?

Who knows, I suspect in some cases its a matter if you don't vote for me you don't get band funds for your house or whatever.  The communities in Labrador are famous for that, people get their votes bought. You're right though, vote her out.
 
Another stupid question: Why hasn't the Mainstream media brought the interesting and relavent, conflict of interest, information to light?
 
Jed said:
Another stupid question: Why hasn't the Mainstream media brought the interesting and relavent, conflict of interest, information to light?

Its out there to a certain extent. The problem is that its been happening for so long its accepted. The fact that its an Aboriginal problem makes it a sensitive issue politically and no one wants to deal with it.
 
Chief Stoker said:
Its out there to a certain extent. The problem is that its been happening for so long its accepted. The fact that its an Aboriginal issue its a very sensitive politically and no one has the intestinal fortitude to deal with it.


TFTFY

Larry
 
I think it's because the INM proponents have figured out that bluster sells quicker than clear and quiet facts. Chief Spence seems to have that one down pat as well.
 
Jed said:
Another stupid question: Why hasn't the Mainstream media brought the interesting and relavent, conflict of interest, information to light?

They have. Including the deal made with the DeBeers mine. However mainstream media seems to also be influenced heavily by public opinion. So far the only non-partisan national paper I've seen has been the G&M. The Star, is obviously so far left that they are indeed the ones holding Chief Spence up like the next Ghandi, and have indicated that the bands financial issues are the Federal Govts fault. The National Post has gone so far as to print articles that are authored by a non-practicing lawyer named Chelsea Vowel, who is not only a native rights blogger, but has her own interpretation of the Indain Act.

The band website has published everything with transparency, but they have been reprimanded by their auditor for questionable entries, incomplete entries, on their financials. The Govt is at a loss to explain where the taxpayer dollars went because the statements reconcile everything under broad based account lines like "Community Development, Administration, etc"

Over the past 6 years, the band has received $131 million from the Feds, and $40 million from DeBeers. $171M adds up to just over $110,000 per person on the reserve. But obvioulsy it isn't making its way down.

The current "protest" is just a smoke and mirrors job to divert public attention from the quagmire that is Attiwapiskat.

The sad irony is that Chief Spence is living in the Ottawa region in a Teepee, so she may be able to empathize with her people left on the reserve whenever she makes her way back. Perhaps it's convenient that Chief Spence went on her "Hunger Strike" diet, just as the cold weather hit, and her band mates were faced with yet another winter with inadequate housing.
 
Bluebulldog said:
They have. Including the deal made with the DeBeers mine.

If I remember correctly, this was featured on CBC (or was it CTV) last year where a whole documentary was done on the housing shortage and the number of houses that DeBeers donated to the town/Reserve, as well as the building of a sewer system and other infrastructure, also built/donated to the Reserve by DeBeers.  Also documented on that program was the building of community facilities that were built and the problems associated with them.
 
Indeed it was.

Funny, what my civvy career is, i actively scanned their financials for any monies earmarked for capital renewal projects, or maintenance repair work.....and found none. Evidently responsible management practices, and planning is a task better suited to other communities. What it appears to be is that they simply build facilities, and then do nothing in the way of maintenance / repair, until they become unfit to occupy, then declare an emergency so you can get more Provincial / Federal dollars.
 
The link to the Chelsea Vowel oped in the National Post referred to above is here.

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/12/31/chelsea-vowel-assimilation-is-not-the-answer-to-the-aboriginal-problem/#comment-752015247

What is interesting is the range of comments, which are well above the standard we usually see in the G&M and the Star. The opinions expressed cover a wide specturm. In my opinion, the first comment has captured the crux of the dilemma.
 
Old Sweat said:
The link to the Chelsea Vowel oped in the National Post referred to above is here.

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/12/31/chelsea-vowel-assimilation-is-not-the-answer-to-the-aboriginal-problem/#comment-752015247

What is interesting is the range of comments, which are well above the standard we usually see in the G&M and the Star. The opinions expressed cover a wide specturm. In my opinion, the first comment has captured the crux of the dilemma.

Actually Miss Vowel has authored several pieces used by the National Post. The one directly speaking to Attiwapiskat was a year ago, and was mistakenly published by another of their writers under the letters / full comment section. But this one is interesting as well.

I find it galling that a national paper would be giving copy space to a person who basically is a professional "pot stirrer". Miss Vowel is a native rights blogger who lives in Montreal. She is also an admitted member of the idle no more movement. Yet none of this is published by the paper as a byline, it would help the reader make more informed decisions if they knew where the source.
 
Here is a video from Ezra Levant in case anyone wants to watch it.

http://ezralevant.com/2013/01/fact-checking-a-hunger-strike.html
 
Robert0288 said:
Here is a video from Ezra Levant in case anyone wants to watch it.

http://ezralevant.com/2013/01/fact-checking-a-hunger-strike.html

Now there's a pile of stuff I didn't know. If the media followed up on even three of the allegations, if true, the wheels would fly right off of the Audit No More movement. However, I feel E Levant is correct. The media would rather crucify PM Harper than find the truth.

And yes, the signatures do look identical, IMO.
 
Robert0288 said:
Here is a video from Ezra Levant in case anyone wants to watch it.

http://ezralevant.com/2013/01/fact-checking-a-hunger-strike.html

Wow
 
Robert0288 said:
Here is a video from Ezra Levant in case anyone wants to watch it.

http://ezralevant.com/2013/01/fact-checking-a-hunger-strike.html

Oh this is golden. If only more people across the country would care to watch this and see what a farce this whole ordeal is.
 
Robert0288 said:
Here is a video from Ezra Levant in case anyone wants to watch it.

http://ezralevant.com/2013/01/fact-checking-a-hunger-strike.html

So?  According to Treaty #9, Chief Theresa Spence is the one breaking the Treaty.
 
There is a reason why the "real" INM movement organizers want to distance themselves from the Chiefs, and specifically "Mayor" Spence.

The people realise that the Chiefs are just politicians of a different stripe and part of the problem.
 
Robert0288 said:
Here is a video from Ezra Levant in case anyone wants to watch it.

http://ezralevant.com/2013/01/fact-checking-a-hunger-strike.html

Wow, watched all 29:15 minutes of it.

This segment needs to go viral, fast....
 
Back
Top