
This was my first thought also.Reminder that one of Trudeau's first acts was to repeal the fiscal accountability act for first nations bands.
I doubt many of those homes or properties are owned outright by the residents. Ownership matters. Plenty of owners let the condition of their properties deteriorate; less custodial motivation exists in renters or other non-owning occupants. Those conditions aren't unique to reserves.Where does all the billions of dollars disappear to?
It certainly doesn't seem to find it's into housing on reserves.
It almost feels like many FN are conditioned (for lack of a better word) to live in squalor.
And so it begins?
Also archived here https://archive.is/gHbWP![]()
Indigenous groups protest across Ontario against fast-track infrastructure laws
First Nations leaders say both levels of government are denying them a say in energy and mining projects that could impact their communitieswww.theglobeandmail.com
perhaps they aren't unique but they certainly appear to be prevalent in greater numbers than in other groups. Take a drive down through the Brantford area and take a look at the prosperous farms on reservation land. do they own them. Why doesn't every individual own his own place. We, the people have certainly spent enough over the years. Harper had the right idea; to force the leadership to be accountable. But the chiefs fought that one and Justin caved to buy a few votes. So it is either their leadership or government mismanagement that keeps them in squalor.I doubt many of those homes or properties are owned outright by the residents. Ownership matters. Plenty of owners let the condition of their properties deteriorate; less custodial motivation exists in renters or other non-owning occupants. Those conditions aren't unique to reserves.
I doubt many of those homes or properties are owned outright by the residents. Ownership matters. Plenty of owners let the condition of their properties deteriorate; less custodial motivation exists in renters or other non-owning occupants. Those conditions aren't unique to reserves.
The Haisla houses all look nice and they have their own municipal crews going around making sure things are working. It's the attitudes of the leadership that changes the way the Reserve operates.Where does all the billions of dollars disappear to?
It certainly doesn't seem to find it's into housing on reserves.
It almost feels like many FN are conditioned (for lack of a better word) to live in squalor.
They might, but I doubt it, but I don't really know. Each treaty stands on its own terms. Typically, FNT lands are held in trust by the Crown but Six Nations was a little different because they were displaced loyalists from the American Revolution and allies in the War of 1812. It was also much earlier than the 'numbered treaties.perhaps they aren't unique but they certainly appear to be prevalent in greater numbers than in other groups. Take a drive down through the Brantford area and take a look at the prosperous farms on reservation land. do they own them. Why doesn't every individual own his own place. We, the people have certainly spent enough over the years. Harper had the right idea; to force the leadership to be accountable. But the chiefs fought that one and Justin caved to buy a few votes. So it is either their leadership or government mismanagement that keeps them in squalor.
These have the look & feel of remote FN places I've seen in Ontario, but I can't tell for sure which reserves these are from - if one is from the Wpg Free Press, I'll assume MB. Remember, like many here like to point out, the media doesn't focus on success stories, which is why there may be more pix like these out there on MSM than the successful places people say they've seen themselves. Why so much money? Yeah, it ain't a perfect, seamless system, but there are some decent reasons - see below.Where does all the billions of dollars disappear to?
It certainly doesn't seem to find it's into housing on reserves.
View attachment 94382
View attachment 94383
View attachment 94384
View attachment 94385
It almost feels like many FN are conditioned (for lack of a better word) to live in squalor.
While Six Nations is a honkin' reserve with it's own history (similar to the Mohawks near Kingston coming here after helping the Brits south of the border during the war leading to tomorrow's U.S. holiday), the reserve property at Six Nations is still held, like other reserves, in trust by the Crown. As a larger, more bureaucratically robust FN, they are more active in their control of the land than other communities, but in most places, there's always somewhere in land processes where INAC/ISC/AANDC has to stick its beak in.Typically, FNT lands are held in trust by the Crown but Six Nations was a little different because they were displaced loyalists from the American Revolution and allies in the War of 1812. It was also much earlier than the 'numbered treaties.
On code in particular, if memory serves, the Ontario Building Code is the tends to be the standard on reserve in Ontario, but it's an adopted standard - Ontario doesn't tend to enforce it. That may have changed since I left the public service, though.It's encouraging that some bands are taking a more leadership role in housing. There are really no building codes on a FNT and even if it argued the federal Code applies, I doubt the government bothers or even has Code enforcement personnel. Besides, I can guess what the response would be if some bureaucrat tried to tell a Council that a building can't be occupied because of deficiencies.
And the cost of shipping those things up the winter roads (in Ontario, big heavy stuff like fuel and building supplies gets shipped up during the winter when you can drive across lakes and rivers - which is also why climate change is VERY trackable in the shrinking season when heavy trucks can make the trips).... Building materials have to be trucked in during the winter then environmentally stored until spring. Then it's up to the FN to have its own trades or wait for a GC to round up trades to fly in. I like the idea of more modular houses, but even they can get pretty beat up on the ice roads.
So one of the great issues with the Indian Act of Canada is that Treaty lands can not be split into private ownership. So in a nutshell...as a status person living on reserve...you can NOT own your own house. This also has huge implications as it affects not just the land ownership but also the ability to have collateral for loans and/or build up personal credit which creates a separate but significant challenge for many.I doubt many of those homes or properties are owned outright by the residents. Ownership matters. Plenty of owners let the condition of their properties deteriorate; less custodial motivation exists in renters or other non-owning occupants. Those conditions aren't unique to reserves.
Short answer:Where does all the billions of dollars disappear to?
It certainly doesn't seem to find it's into housing on reserves.
View attachment 94382
View attachment 94383
View attachment 94384
View attachment 94385
It almost feels like many FN are conditioned (for lack of a better word) to live in squalor.
How housing is allocated probably varied between councils. I have a friend who lives on a southern Ontario FNT. He had a house, but moved into his mother's house after she passed as it was his right under the way they do things (I don't know what happened to the house he moved from). His wife is not FN and they are under no illusion that, we he passes, she will be kicked off the the territory.In addition there may be challenges - depending on the community - regarding who gets control of the housing...and often friends and family get the nice places while the rest of the community is on the outs.
On the ground, it sometimes plays out a bit like this ...The government is essentially the landlord; the band councils are the property managers. In terms of repairs, condition or upkeep, the landlord doesn't care and neither do the property managers by and large. Even if they did, they often don't have the financial means to do much about it.
There is similar housing in Haiti. the leadership there is corrupt as wellShort answer:
It depends on the particular band. And whoever the chief and his/her minions are.
My understanding is a bit different. Someone on reserve can own the house if they buy or build it, but they can't own the land it's on. This is why it's hard to get a mortgage - banks are leery about lending money with no security other than a building you may or may not be able to tow away from land the loan holder doesn't even own.So one of the great issues with the Indian Act of Canada is that Treaty lands can not be split into private ownership. So in a nutshell...as a status person living on reserve...you can NOT own your own house. This also has huge implications as it affects not just the land ownership but also the ability to have collateral for loans and/or build up personal credit which creates a separate but significant challenge for many.
Small-single-or-no-industry town issues cubed when you can only fly in and out of a community in the summer, for sure.In addition there may be challenges - depending on the community - regarding who gets control of the housing...and often friends and family get the nice places while the rest of the community is on the outs. Then compound the problem especially on more isolated communities over insufficient work to justify full time tradesman to keep maintenance up or paying a large premium to get work done....which further erodes the budget set based often upon national or provincial average costs...not remote work costs.
I vaguely remember one of the better-off FNs in AB (maybe with access to oil money or jobs from oil?) had that kind of agreement in place. Good to hear!Despite the bad news above there is however a nuance that some First Nations have started to develop...mostly the larger 6 Nations communities...where they are issuing fixed term leases for lots on the reserve to band members. Because you have a lease, now you can qualify for a mortgage, and now folks are building something that can not be arbitrarily taken away next band election. This would be similar to folks building within Jasper National Park (you have leased land within the Park - not title ownership) or the more common band initiated business partnership leases for gas stations/hotels/casinos/industrial yards....
I'm working on a wildfire as we speak dealing with First Nations. Some are doing okay....others are in pretty rough shape. A lot is dependent upon local priorities and in some cases creating alternate income streams.My understanding is a bit different. Someone on reserve can own the house if they buy or build it, but they can't own the land it's on. This is why it's hard to get a mortgage - banks are leery about lending money with no security other than a building you may or may not be able to tow away from land the loan holder doesn't even own.
Small-single-or-no-industry town issues cubed when you can only fly in and out of a community in the summer, for sure.
I vaguely remember one of the better-off FNs in AB (maybe with access to oil money or jobs from oil?) had that kind of agreement in place. Good to hear!
Consulting on a project. The chief lamented they had no fire protection. I told him, that the these big companies would love to help them start a volunteer fire department and supply a couple of special equipped pickup trucks. All they had to do was to get the volunteers. He kind of looked down, mumbled a bit and changed the subject. The problem is that the people on the Reserves generally don't volunteer and don't get involved, waiting for "Someone else" to do it and then being ungrateful when they do come. Another Band told me they had 40%+ unemployment and not enough staff to review all the referrals we sent them. I suggested they have a day where they put soup and coffee on and get some of these people into the band office and look at the referrals and talk about them. It would be good for them, the band, us and the proponent. Again nothing happened.On code in particular, if memory serves, the Ontario Building Code is the tends to be the standard on reserve in Ontario, but it's an adopted standard - Ontario doesn't tend to enforce it. That may have changed since I left the public service, though.
That's part of the messy stew that is sucky housing in a lot of remote FNs. Sometimes hear about some of this following fatal house fires, like this ....
Remote communities face a multiple-whammy of little/no fire department (not enough $ according to the formula - litigation in play as I type), BIGLY expensive to build (think up to almost 5x the cost per square foot -- $140-400/sq foot average in Ontario outside-of-Toronto urban vs. ~$650/sq foot on remote FNs according to CBC), as well as a range of band government capability re: maintaining homes they own.![]()
Introduction | Ontario Chief Coroner’s Table on understanding fire deaths in First Nations
This report examines fire deaths in First Nations communities in Ontario from 2008 to 2017.www.ontario.ca
Some bands are full of go-getters and go like crazy, while I've also heard stories like these too - the mileage varies tremendously from the best FNs to the ones needing the most help.Consulting on a project. The chief lamented they had no fire protection. I told him, that the these big companies would love to help them start a volunteer fire department and supply a couple of special equipped pickup trucks. All they had to do was to get the volunteers. He kind of looked down, mumbled a bit and changed the subject. The problem is that the people on the Reserves generally don't volunteer and don't get involved, waiting for "Someone else" to do it and then being ungrateful when they do come. Another Band told me they had 40%+ unemployment and not enough staff to review all the referrals we sent them. I suggested they have a day where they put soup and coffee on and get some of these people into the band office and look at the referrals and talk about them. It would be good for them, the band, us and the proponent. Again nothing happened.