• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

All Things First Nations - CF help, protests, solutions, residential schools, etc. (merged)

Give us more MONEY.

Cowichan Tribes calls illegal dumping a ‘generational, systemic’ problem and urges federal action 10 Nov 25


Cowichan Tribes is calling on the federal government to take responsibility for an unauthorized dumping site on its reserve lands, saying the contamination of Indigenous lands is a national issue that Ottawa has long failed to address.

In a statement issued Monday, Cowichan Tribes said it has been trying for more than a decade to stop illegal dumping and unlicensed gravel and timber removal on the site at 5544 Indian Road in Duncan, but its efforts have been limited by federal jurisdiction.

“Pollution and contamination of reserve land is a generational, systemic, and national problem,” the First Nation said in its statement.

“The tools to combat the pollution of reserve lands are primarily under federal jurisdiction, including the Indian Act and the Indian Reserve Waste Disposal Regulations. However, the Government of Canada is reluctant to prosecute polluters.”

Cowichan Tribes said it has repeatedly issued cease-and-desist orders to people and companies involving in dumping at the site and has met with officials from Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, Health Canada, Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada, as well as the RCMP.

Despite those efforts, Cowichan Tribes says it lacks the authority to enforce or remediate the affected parcels of land because they remain under federal jurisdiction, and aren’t covered by the Cowichan Tribes Land Code.

“The Government of Canada owes ongoing duties to Cowichan Tribes and its Citizens to continue to work in good faith with Cowichan Tribes to resolve such outstanding grievances with respect to lands matters,” it said.

Cowichan Tribes confirmed it has been cooperating with the province’s investigation into the site since 2021 and welcomes the recent attention.

“Cowichan Tribes is pleased to see the site finally get the attention it deserves. It is our hope that the Federal government will now fulfill its long overdue responsibility to take action to address the site,” it said in its statement.

Last week, media outlets in B.C. including CHEK News reported that the B.C. Ministry of Environment had ordered the cleanup of the site, citing a large accumulation of construction debris, imported soil with elevated metals and other potentially contaminated materials near the Cowichan River.

The order, issued Oct. 2, requires James Anthony Peter (a band member) to halt dumping on three lots and hire a qualified professional to develop a remediation plan.

A 2023 report prepared for the province found the site was leaching toward the Cowichan River and identified hazardous substances including arsenic, lead, zinc and hydrocarbons.

That report estimated the dumping pile at the time was made up of 40 per cent construction and demolition waste, 25 per cent imported soil and 20 per cent wood and land-clearing debris as well as smaller amounts of broken concrete, tires and household garbage.

Cowichan Tribes says it has long prioritized environmental stewardship in Quw’utsun territory, pointing to decades of watershed restoration, co-governance work and community cleanup programs.

bold GIF
 
The Cowichan Tribe received at total of $559,174,325 in Tax Money from 2017-2025

2024 – $94,612,898
2023 – $93,842,606
2021 – $68,783,182
2020 – $52,380,224
2019 – $58,235,940
2018 – $48,878,721
2017 – $36,517,007

Covering April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025), the tribe's total revenue was $144,166,633. Of this, a significant portion—approximately $100 million—comes from government transfers and grants.

The membership of the Cowichan Tribes (Band #642) in British Columbia is listed as 5,614 registered members as of October 2025.

And of those, over 2600 live off-reserve and unless 'special considerations' are made, they are excluded from all band financial disbursements. This helps keep band members from escaping the cycle of 'band supports', and moving on to join the rest of society.
 
The Cowichan Tribe received at total of $559,174,325 in Tax Money from 2017-2025

2024 – $94,612,898
2023 – $93,842,606
2021 – $68,783,182
2020 – $52,380,224
2019 – $58,235,940
2018 – $48,878,721
2017 – $36,517,007

Covering April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025), the tribe's total revenue was $144,166,633. Of this, a significant portion—approximately $100 million—comes from government transfers and grants.

The membership of the Cowichan Tribes (Band #642) in British Columbia is listed as 5,614 registered members as of October 2025.

And of those, over 2600 live off-reserve and unless 'special considerations' are made, they are excluded from all band financial disbursements. This helps keep band members from escaping the cycle of 'band supports', and moving on to join the rest of society.

Harper was right when he wanted transparency on their bookkeeping.
 
So unnamed people, some of whom are having charges related to illegal dumping stayed for no explained reason, are traveling to this unauthorized landfill site in First Nation territory, owned and operated by a First Nations member, and dumping garbage. And it's up to the government to do remediation on the land.

I wonder who the culprits dumping their garbage there are.
 
The Cowichan Tribe received at total of $559,174,325 in Tax Money from 2017-2025

2024 – $94,612,898
2023 – $93,842,606
2021 – $68,783,182
2020 – $52,380,224
2019 – $58,235,940
2018 – $48,878,721
2017 – $36,517,007

Covering April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025), the tribe's total revenue was $144,166,633. Of this, a significant portion—approximately $100 million—comes from government transfers and grants.

The membership of the Cowichan Tribes (Band #642) in British Columbia is listed as 5,614 registered members as of October 2025.

And of those, over 2600 live off-reserve and unless 'special considerations' are made, they are excluded from all band financial disbursements. This helps keep band members from escaping the cycle of 'band supports', and moving on to join the rest of society.


144,166,633
Call it 144,000 000 for easy math

5614 members
2600 off reserve
3000 (easy math) to share the wealth

144,000,000 / 3000 = 48,000

Assuming a household of 5

240,000 per year annual income.

Work-free.
 
144,166,633
Call it 144,000 000 for easy math

5614 members
2600 off reserve
3000 (easy math) to share the wealth

144,000,000 / 3000 = 48,000

Assuming a household of 5

240,000 per year annual income.

Work-free.
To be fair, that’s like totalling all the grants province x gives to municipality y and saying each member gets z/year “income.” How big a cheque does the province cut you in municipal grants per year? :)

Ton of money, no doubt, but if it’s on a federal, publicly-available portal, the overwhelming majority of the funds go to services, not cheques to residents.
 
To be fair, that’s like totalling all the grants province x gives to municipality y and saying each member gets z/year “income.” How big a cheque does the province cut you in municipal grants per year? :)

Ton of money, no doubt, but if it’s on a federal, publicly-available portal, the overwhelming majority of the funds go to services, not cheques to residents.


Fair but...

3000 people.

That is a very tight target group.

240,000 year income.
80,000 per year towards a mortgage
30 year mortgage
5%

Supports a family of 5 in a property worth 1.2 to 1.6 MCAD.

And a continuing income of 160,000 per year.

I don't know about you but I think I could be pretty much self-sustaining anywhere in Canada with that situation.

I might even be able to buy an RO system and pay for my own medical insurance.
 
Fair but...

3000 people.

That is a very tight target group.

240,000 year income.
80,000 per year towards a mortgage
30 year mortgage
5%

Supports a family of 5 in a property worth 1.2 to 1.6 MCAD.

And a continuing income of 160,000 per year.

I don't know about you but I think I could be pretty much self-sustaining anywhere in Canada with that situation.

I might even be able to buy an RO system and pay for my own medical insurance.
We're disagreeing on what "income" means.

I read your math as if all federal grant money going to reserves is being distributed as cheques to individual band members. It's not - it's generally going to FN governments to deliver services. Most people wouldn't consider that as "income."

How much provincial grant to your city/town do you get to apply to your mortgage? I doubt you get a cheque from your provincial government every year with a post-it note saying, "go run your services."

Fair to say "here's how much money FN x is getting per head to run the place," and to compare ratios to municipalities, but that ain't the same as "here's how much each person living on reserve is getting into their direct deposit" (which is where mortgages and health insurance would be paid out of).
 
We're disagreeing on what "income" means.

I read your math as if all federal grant money going to reserves is being distributed as cheques to individual band members. It's not - it's generally going to FN governments to deliver services. Most people wouldn't consider that as "income."

How much provincial grant to your city/town do you get to apply to your mortgage? I doubt you get a cheque from your provincial government every year with a post-it note saying, "go run your services."

Fair to say "here's how much money FN x is getting per head to run the place," and to compare ratios to municipalities, but that ain't the same as "here's how much each person living on reserve is getting into their direct deposit" (which is where mortgages and health insurance would be paid out of).

I am saying we would be better off, and so would the natives, if we did just write a check for 240,000 for each household each year. Fire the bureaucrats and bypass the chiefs.
 
I am saying we would be better off, and so would the natives, if we did just write a check for 240,000 for each household each year. Fire the bureaucrats and bypass the chiefs.
NOW I get it - thanks!
 
I am saying we would be better off, and so would the natives, if we did just write a check for 240,000 for each household each year.

It would be no different than the parking lots of shacks after deployments. I guess that’s one way to keep Windsor assembly lines open.
 
We're disagreeing on what "income" means.

I read your math as if all federal grant money going to reserves is being distributed as cheques to individual band members. It's not - it's generally going to FN governments to deliver services. Most people wouldn't consider that as "income."

How much provincial grant to your city/town do you get to apply to your mortgage? I doubt you get a cheque from your provincial government every year with a post-it note saying, "go run your services."

Fair to say "here's how much money FN x is getting per head to run the place," and to compare ratios to municipalities, but that ain't the same as "here's how much each person living on reserve is getting into their direct deposit" (which is where mortgages and health insurance would be paid out of).
So I looked at Wiarton with a population of about half of the band and its budget (reflecting a 3.5% increase was 13.5 million. Brighton with a population 3 times that of the band has an operating budget of 20 mill. and is backing a 42 million dollar capital expenditure budget to put in sewers, water systems and roads. The bands get a lot of cash with no accountability and they have certainly all received enough to put in decent water systems
 
I am saying we would be better off, and so would the natives, if we did just write a check for 240,000 for each household each year. Fire the bureaucrats and bypass the chiefs.
Alternatively have the bands raise taxes from the locals and fund the locals directly. I bet there would be changes in how the funds are spent.

It is one thing to have the band given money and be mismanaged. It is another all together to have your money mismanaged.
 
@Eaglelord17

Another example of serendipity

Goldstein on the benefits of experts and central planning.


The only thing I would add to the article is that the rationing began in the 70s, shortly after the provinces all instituted provincial insurance plans.
 
@Eaglelord17

Another example of serendipity

Goldstein on the benefits of experts and central planning.


The only thing I would add to the article is that the rationing began in the 70s, shortly after the provinces all instituted provincial insurance plans.


The rationing started in the 70s as I recall. The first round was restricting the number of licences to practice so that not all medical graduates could start practicing. This, together with government imposed limits on the amounts doctors could earn drove doctors out of the country.

The next step was to reduce the number of doctors being trained.
 
Alternatively have the bands raise taxes from the locals and fund the locals directly. I bet there would be changes in how the funds are spent.

It is one thing to have the band given money and be mismanaged. It is another all together to have your money mismanaged.
Milton Friedman's four ways to spend money:

1. Your own, on yourself. Frugal, value-seeking (as measured by you).
2. Your own, on someone else. Frugal, less value-seeking (as measured by recipient).
3. Someone else's, on you. Less frugal, value-seeking.
4. Someone else's, on someone else (former and latter often different people). Less frugal, less value-seeking.

(4) is the worst. It is practically impossible to overcome the deficiency of incentives. Public spending often enough is profligate and worthless.
 
Back
Top