- Reaction score
- 7,299
- Points
- 1,090
Not really the best idea. Mainly because of availability rate. Geography doesn't change, we know what areas we need to cover with radar. So having a radar available all the time, no worry about the ship breaking down etc... is a better idea. You can also have a lot more power for that radar, both processing and detection. And you can run a land line to other establishments for communication to integrate all that information from all the sensors (sattelite, ships, aircraft, other ground based detectors).Not sure where to place this question but this seemed a reasonable place. Please move if it has a more appropriate thread.
Instead of "land basing" any new radar technology (SPY7 etc) would it not be feasible to have them on purpose built ships? It may require a couple more systems to deal with scheduled maintenance of the ships but they would be mobile and less susceptible to stagnant installations, observation, and targeting. It might mean a class 2 or better hull for winter but 6 or seven hulls should provide continued surveillance. Just a thought....
There is merit in having a mobile system to do overlaping coverage, but in Canada our plan is to use aircraft (AEW or AWAC) for that purpose.