- Reaction score
- 19,283
- Points
- 1,160

One other note re: age of completion... 16-18 is when cadets are getting the bulk of their experience in leadership/staff/instructional roles. 12-15 is spent specifically under training, developing into leadership roles starting around 14. Both of these phases have value, and regardless of the training content, curtailing either time under training or time leading/delivering training will significantly weaken both the output (a hopefully more rounded/mature/CAF aware/good citizen 19 year old, whatever they go on to do) and the progam's internal quality: 16-18 year old cadets are the key instructor and leadership cadre for the juniors, if everything's going well, and the CIC and other adults are instructing/guiding/mentoring the senior cadets and dealing with the admin, planning, etc. world. YMMV per corps/squadron depending on demographics, fluky retention, etc.You're losing sight of the fact Cadets doesn't primarily exist to put people in the P Res... If people switch over, it's because they wanted to join the type of unit available in the local area and they had their parents permission. Don't break a functional youth organization because the reserves can't fix themselves.
How many people is an infantry reserve unit losing because someone wants to sail small boats or fly a glider? There are more types of cadets than just army cadets... Also, each army cadet corps is affiliated with a local reserve unit, so cadets get exposure to what the unit does. People sticking in cadets likely aren't interested in the local unit if they are staying in an unpaid youth organization over the reserves.
I'm guessing you weren't a cadet, and haven't spoken to many former cadets. Many of us do go on to join the CAF, even if not in the "element" that we were cadets. Cadets doesn't exist to fix the reserves, and encouraging recruitment is way down on the priority list for the organization.
One cadet with para wings in the real world speaking positively about their experience in the cadet programme is worth 100x more than another disgruntled former P Res Pte who joined at 16 to become a ninja sniper, found out their vision category didn't qualify for the trade they wanted. then booted out of their P Res unit because the non-combat arms jobs were already full.
Cadets are the wrong tool to use to generate 16 year old recruits, who can't partake in the adult things being done around them... Make the reserves feel more useful and welcoming to 16 year old kids, and they will likely pick it over a military adjacent youth organization.
Actually, if you think about it, the Baden-Powell's Scouts and Guides were training soldiers. They still teach firearms safety and shooting.
Their original uniform was expressly military in cut. As was the Boys' Brigade.
Like any group, it's entirely dependent on the group's leadership and I don't know how it works for Sparkes. I did a quick check and shooting sports are still on the website (though only for scouts and up for firearms, cubs can do bows/slingshots/crossbows). I did beavers through scouts/junior scouter thing since we didn't have a venturer program but never did firearms. Did do potato cannons though which is apparently banned. From what I remember being out on the occasional weekend where there were also cadets it was more beneficial in terms of outdoor skills and general resilience. We were all camped out in improvised shelters on the regular, responsible for our own meal plans for weekend canoe trips, plenty of hiking which was great prep for rucking.My daughter is now a Pathfinder and started in Sparkes. No firearms training has been taught, yet, by them.
This is a super dumb tangent we have gotten onto, but Scouts have almost no mandatory programming- it is largely up to the Scouts themselves (with adult guidance) to select the activities that interest them. Shooting sports are a permitted activity in the program, if a particular group chooses it. To say that Scouts Canada, in 2026, is paramilitary because of that is to stretch the word completely out of context.Like any group, it's entirely dependent on the group's leadership and I don't know how it works for Sparkes. I did a quick check and shooting sports are still on the website (though only for scouts and up for firearms, cubs can do bows/slingshots/crossbows). I did beavers through scouts/junior scouter thing since we didn't have a venturer program but never did firearms. Did do potato cannons though which is apparently banned. From what I remember being out on the occasional weekend where there were also cadets it was more beneficial in terms of outdoor skills and general resilience. We were all camped out in improvised shelters on the regular, responsible for our own meal plans for weekend canoe trips, plenty of hiking which was great prep for rucking.
Even taught drill, tactics, and weapons handling if you consider capgun muskets at 1812 reenactments to be weapons handling.
I see no need to change the Cadet program. I think it's useful for general civic development in our youth as well as being military "adjacent" as a window into the CAF for those who might become interested. Diverting 16-18 year old cadets out of the program and into the Reserves would a) deprive both the older cadets of leadership opportunities and b) deprive younger cadets of youth mentors/role models. As previously noted you would also likely lose a significant portion due to parents not wanting to sign off on their children joining the military.One other note re: age of completion... 16-18 is when cadets are getting the bulk of their experience in leadership/staff/instructional roles. 12-15 is spent specifically under training, developing into leadership roles starting around 14. Both of these phases have value, and regardless of the training content, curtailing either time under training or time leading/delivering training will significantly weaken both the output (a hopefully more rounded/mature/CAF aware/good citizen 19 year old, whatever they go on to do) and the progam's internal quality: 16-18 year old cadets are the key instructor and leadership cadre for the juniors, if everything's going well, and the CIC and other adults are instructing/guiding/mentoring the senior cadets and dealing with the admin, planning, etc. world. YMMV per corps/squadron depending on demographics, fluky retention, etc.
Like a Canadian centric Adult volunteer organization? I know Scouting goes up to 25 or something like that.
There are plenty of opportunities for adults to volunteer. You have service clubs like Rotary, Lions, Optimist, etc. Although, these are generally international and have limited "citizenship" involvement.
If you want something for adults where they wear a uniform and have some type of civi involvement you could look at St John Ambulance who have a military style rank structure and alligence to the King via his role as Sovereign Head of the Order of St John. Depending on your involvement, you can actually end up doing some important things.
I'm not sure if this was along the lines of what you were looking for, but it was the best example I could think of other than joining something like the Monarchist League or the Orange Order both of course are not run by the government or recieve any type of government funding.
Clearly you need to join these guys:I am looking for something more focused. Something that involves a structure and a chain of command with a means of tracking training and availability.
Something like St John Ambulance for the security and other emergency/civil-defence services would work. Preferably under federal government auspices but local control.
We have enough dance troupes in funny hats.
One thing that makes me consider history more though is the demographics around age of eligible population and societies self imposed limits on membership to units.23rd Alberta Rangers (Light Horse)
Squadrons in
Claresholm (settled by US Norwegians from North Dakota 1902) - 1911 population of 809
Magrath (settled by US Mormons from Utah 1899) - 1911 population of 995
Cardston (settled by US Mormons Utah1887) - 1911 population of 1207
Pincher Creek (1878 NWMP horse ranch and out post settled from 1883) - 1911 population of 1200
I am thinking that a combination of recent experience with a rising in Canada, 1885, a high percentage of US expats/refugees with experience of posses and militias, and ongoing labour, native, settler and revolutionary violence from south of the Rio Grande to Vancouver Island coal mines probably encouraged the locals to establish "legitimate" posses under the auspices of the Canadian government's Militia and the watchful eye of the RNWMP.
Cardston and Pincher Creek had RNWMP dets of 3 each and Claresholm had a det of 2. Magrath had no mounties but adjacent Stafford and Warner each had 1 and Lethbridge had the K Division HQ had a det of 21. Lethbridge was also home to the Independent 25th Field Battery (presumably 4x 18-Pdrs). And the RCA were useful for managing public order issues as shown by the 5th Company Canadian Garrison Artillery who missed summer camp because of some obstreperous BC coal miners on Vancouver Island.
Lethbridge - (settled by whisky traders, coal miners and railroad workers from 1869) - 1911 population of 9,242
Stirling (settled by US Mormons from Utah 1899) - 1911 population unknown
Warner - (settled by US Mormons from Utah from 1890) - 1913 population of 170
Local heros include Billy Miner
![]()
Bill Miner - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Virtual Saskatchewan - The Infamous Sam Kelley
Sam Kelley, alias Charles (Red) Nelson, was an outlaw in the Big Muddy.www.virtualsk.com
Unsettled settlers might describe the locals.
Those Claresholm folk from North Dakota - Wounded Knee Massacre 1890
The Mormons from Utah - the last violence against Mormons was in Tennesse in 1884 - they had got used to protecting themselves
Well...they did form one CEF battalion way back...https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/210th_Battalion_(Frontiersmen),_CEFClearly you need to join these guys:
![]()
Legion of Frontiersmen - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
They do apparently fill some volunteers roles in the UK, but their existence in Canada is kind of without purpose.
True, and if they could raise a Battalion in the current day, they would be the most effective recruiting tool in the country.Well...they did form one CEF battalion way back...https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/210th_Battalion_(Frontiersmen),_CEF
Clearly you need to join these guys:
![]()
Legion of Frontiersmen - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
They do apparently fill some volunteers roles in the UK, but their existence in Canada is kind of without purpose.
They were an actual military formation.Canadian version
Corps of Guides
![]()
Corps of Guides (Canada) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
And keep at it. Keep telling yourselves you have got it covered and don't need any help.
