- Reaction score
- 24,321
- Points
- 1,010
I heard it was a honey badger…My understanding that the Wolverine was selected to be put on the DoC badge/Divisional badge...

I heard it was a honey badger…My understanding that the Wolverine was selected to be put on the DoC badge/Divisional badge...
I heard it's Deadpool, not Wolverine.I heard it was a honey badger…
The new headquarters isn't in charge for another 2 months nor are they fully stood up. The Army Reserves had decades to fix themselves and couldn't. Stop waiting on a HQ to help you.Hopefully the new headquarters starts communicating whats coming down the pipe in less than 2 months.
Lmao what are you going on about? "Stop expecting your new chain of command to communicate whats going on".The new headquarters isn't in charge for another 2 months nor are they fully stood up. The Army Reserves had decades to fix themselves and couldn't. Stop waiting on a HQ to help you.
Your new chain doesn't exist yet. Some haven't even had a RFD date pass by yet.Lmao what are you going on about? "Stop expecting your new chain of command to communicate whats going on".
While 2 Div has not taken ownership of the CBGs outside Quebec and there will be a lot of pers rotation at APS, the 2 Div HQ has been fully stood up for years. I have no doubt there are people in that HQ thinking about what is coming next, but there are a lot of moving parts and the division's job is defence of Canada (it's not "the PRes Div") which means it has bigger issues to consider than just tinkering with CBG orbats. If there is a major DOMOP on 01 October, how is 2 Div going to respond to that when it no longer has direct control over a local Reg F Service Battalion and/or Tech Svcs unit to support a CBG deployment? Maybe that question has more urgent need of an answer than pontificating on the role of the buckshot fusiliers in three years time.The new headquarters isn't in charge for another 2 months nor are they fully stood up.
At the risk of being one of those guys . . . again . . . I think a little criticism is due.I'm sure theres lots of smart people working on it, but an estimate for the 10 year plan of an entire Div isn't going to be ready on 11 Sept. I also have no doubt 2 Div will respond professionally and figure out whatever they need to accomplish a mission in the intervening time.
The annoying part is the constant complaints from forum posters here demanding a way forward when any smart leader knows that estimate will take time to do properly.

2 Div already has a Division Badge, it's had one since 1915.My understanding that the Wolverine was selected to be put on the DoC badge/Divisional badge...
I am tracking a lot of horsepower was hidden away from the rest of Army HQ to start the modernization planning from first principles. Calling modernization a riff of an old plan seems like it might be diminishing a lot of hard work from a position of ignorance.Force 2025 studies are several years old and, let's be honest, army modernization is just a riff on those studies.
The whole Army does this but, because someone’s planning priorities don’t aling with yours, you are ready to accuse (again from a position of ignorance) they don’t.We gunners have a little thing we do called "concurrent activity."
It was not. The army will be four divisions (though we will continue to call one of those a “centre”)If the high level decision was made to concentrate the army in two divs …
The complaint you are piling onto is the lack of in-the-weeds Army Reserve transformation details… that’s not a day 1 problem. The stuff that is a day 1 problem impacts formations and will be invisible in individual unit lines. There is a lot of unanswered questions for Day 1, but none of those questions involve reorganizations or retasking of reserve units.it's the communication plan and the Day 1 Business transformation plan that hasn't gotten out.
Hopefully they have an increased budget to have mobile mechincs called, have their credit card in file at the local heavy equipment parts supplier and third party food and other supplies delivered.While 2 Div has not taken ownership of the CBGs outside Quebec and there will be a lot of pers rotation at APS, the 2 Div HQ has been fully stood up for years. I have no doubt there are people in that HQ thinking about what is coming next, but there are a lot of moving parts and the division's job is defence of Canada (it's not "the PRes Div") which means it has bigger issues to consider than just tinkering with CBG orbats. If there is a major DOMOP on 01 October, how is 2 Div going to respond to that when it no longer has direct control over a local Reg F Service Battalion and/or Tech Svcs unit to support a CBG deployment?
Maybe that question has more urgent need of an answer than pontificating on the role of the buckshot fusiliers in three years time.
