• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Brain Injury Pension Decisions

dunlop303

Jr. Member
Inactive
Reaction score
0
Points
110
Hi Everyone,

I am new to the board and was looking for other people who had gone threw the process for Traumatic Brain Injury or Diffuse Axonal Injury to be more specific.
Just wondering what to expect in terms of a decision, most of my old army buddies (And I) have already gone threw for physical injuries from IED's and PTSD in some cases.

But due to the nature of brain injuries, this diagnosis comes years later and I don't know anyone that has been down this path or what result to expect.
Everything is in with VAC and a decision is overdue by a Month of course.

I am sitting at 62% on my previous diagnoses, and after trying to un biasly calc entitlement based on what they say on their website, I estimate anywhere between 28-40% depending on how they interpret the Dr's notes in the diagnosis. Just wondering if that's in line with what others have received.

To be clear; Diagnosis - Traumatic Brain Injury / Diffuse Axonal Injury due to multiple IED blasts and blunt force trauma (all service related).

Numbness, Pain, and Strength loss on left side of body (left hand dominate). "irretractible pain"

Thanks Everyone, I appreciate your sharing of your experience.
 
No one else has gone threw the hoops for traumatic brain injury?
VAC adjudication review now coming up on 23 weeks and counting..

The last Rep I spoke to at VAC said the new unofficial standard is 24 weeks rather than their stated 16, and that the Senior Management
does not want to change the standard publicly however 24 weeks is the standard internally. She said this causes a flood of 8 weeks of calling per application regarding overdue pension decisions.

Unique management style.

 
Yep, 24 weeks seems to be it now, they old switcharoo, tell them it takes 16 weeks, have it take 24, but write up all the reports saying the rate of decisions at 16 weeks is at 80+%.

I don't think there is anyone that has had an easy time dealing with VAC over the last year and a bit.
 
It's Crazy,

I remember back in '07 when I got back they were calling me weekly bugging me to come in and start a claim for my injuries.
And when I finally did it was only a few months start to finish. Allot has changed since then I guess.
 
blackberet17 said:
Low on manpower to process claims after the budget cuts.

For some reason I think I read that CF has more VAC staff per vet than any other country...

I think it more likely has to do with the bureaucratic nightmare of paperwork and hard copies of everything. Can't just fax or email, everything has to be mailed to PEI and Quebec
 
ixium said:
For some reason I think I read that CF has more VAC staff per vet than any other country...

I think it more likely has to do with the bureaucratic nightmare of paperwork and hard copies of everything. Can't just fax or email, everything has to be mailed to PEI and Quebec

Um...not exactly. I've faxed docs in, such as an audiogram (after contact established, of course). And through My VAC Account, I think you can scan and submit documents. If not, I know it's one of the builds coming.
 
Fellow TBI'er here (for lack of a better phrase).

In regards to your pending decision, numbers wise you're not far off. I know when I went through the table of disabilities for myself and linked symptom to rating in said table, I was pleasantly suprised at the result that VAC came up with, however it only gives you the final number, not what is for what if you know what I mean (5% for this, 10% for that, 3%for this).

Is there anyway we can make a sticky for Traumatic Brain Injury sufferers on here? Canada seems to be doing a terrible job of tracking/researching this 'signature' injury of the GWOT compared to the states who have whole Centres of Excellence in Brain Injury and numerous studies and trials to draw from. I even asked a neurologist who's been helping me and he just shrugged and suggested botox for the headaches!

VAC cut me a cheque and said have a nice day. It's only thanks to National Geographic and USA Today that I now know I have a higher chance of premature dementia/Alzheimers and other lovely diseases to look forward to, that is if I survive that long (the majority of TBI suffers seem to die by suicide before they get that far.
 
Thanks for the reply!

Tell me about it, I am fortunate enough to be going threw the civilian medical system for diagnosis and they are more honest about the facts of the injury, that it is not curable and could kill you randomly one day or paralyze you ect. Interesting timing, I got a call from VAC this morning verifying my bank info and advising they had reached a decision but couldn't disclose the details yet as they are drafting their official letter.

Your right though there are zero resources for this in Canada, VAC and the Feds are trying to smush this and PTSD together so they can be treated at OSI clinics together. I couldn't disagree more, in some cases the impacts are mental / emotional in which case that may work, but in others and mine specifically the impacts are physiological and require nervous system specialists ect.

Your also correct on how I estimated what % I thought I would get, just essentially match up the diagnosis form with their entitlement form and add up all the little numbers.

In addition to the diseases it can lead too, a big question I have is the consequences of needing strong medications for the rest of my life both physically and mentally.. Do they accept ownership for that, how is entitlement determined? Do you have to wait for liver failure? ect.

If you don't mind, can you PM me with the summary of your decision and if the impacts were more mental or physical? I think that is one of the biggest hindrances on applicants, no one wants to disclose "how much" they got. But it makes it difficult to spot a decision that is way off the mark if no one knows what other people got for similar situations.

 
Hi, I've sent a PM.

In summary, the effects were a mix of mental/physical. Started off with consistent headaches, I was in 2 IED strikes (<6m away from both, no physical injuries) where I 'saw stars', didn't lose conciousness but felt numb and dizzy and nauseaus afterwards, plus got hit with a Carl G backblast in between as well.

Anyways started off with daily, 6-8 out of ten on pain scale, headaches, progressed to short term memory loss, severe emotional disturbances, and weight gain.

Fun times.
 
Thanks Again,

I appreciate the information, similar situation 2 IED's but I was on top of them in a tank luckily. Both caused injury, one knocked me out.
Its hard for me to tell because I was diagnosed with PTSD quite a while back so who knows which symptoms are which, but I only discovered this after I started losing strength and sensation on the left side of my body for no apparent reason.
 
dunlop303 said:
Do they accept ownership for that, how is entitlement determined? Do you have to wait for liver failure? ect.

Not sure who you mean by "they"...

What you may be looking at down the road - for which I can't provide a timeline - are claims for medical conditions which arise as a consequence of the primary medical condition.

Example:

Cpl Bloggins suffers from PTSD, as a result of experiences and trauma while in service in Country D. He applied for disability benefits, and VAC awarded disability benefits for his PTSD.

IOT treat his PTSD symptoms, Cpl Bloggins has to take medications X, F, and M. All three, according to the Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties (a pharmacist's bible, essentially), may cause gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD).

After a couple years, and a couple years of taking medications X, F, and M, Cpl Bloggins develops GERD.

To eliminate other possibilities, we know Cpl Bloggins has never had so much as a bad burp, nor had to take Pepto-Bysmol for that nasty chili the mess served one night.

Cpl Bloggins applies to VAC for disability benefits, with a medical opinion in hand, and extracts from the Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties for his three medications.

VAC reviews the application and - in light of the medical evidence - determines, yep, Cpl Bloggins' GERD is related to the medications taken to treat the PTSD. Disability benefits are awarded for GERD, as a consequence of the awarded PTSD condition.
 
I am closely following this.  I was treated for a TBI and left on medication for 2 years longer then I was supposed to be.  I am now experincing some of the affects of long term use of this medication. 
 
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is also relatively new as a medical condition. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) in the US didn't start tracking it - for lack of a better term - until 2002 as its own, specific medical condition, i.e. separate and distinct from brain lesions and bleeds, concussions, etc. It is also a term separate from penetrating head injuries, which is an important distinction.

The other thing is, on the military side of TBI, we didn't start seeing them until Afghanistan, due to the nature of the combat and traumatic injuries which were occurring amongst deployed personnel, in part due to the IEDs.

Some of the side effects of TBI are only starting to be understood, not unlike how it took almost a hundred years to go from trench fever to shell shock to PTSD.
 
blackberet17 said:
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is also relatively new as a medical condition. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) in the US didn't start tracking it - for lack of a better term - until 2002 as its own, specific medical condition, i.e. separate and distinct from brain lesions and bleeds, concussions, etc. It is also a term separate from penetrating head injuries, which is an important distinction.

The other thing is, on the military side of TBI, we didn't start seeing them until Afghanistan, due to the nature of the combat and traumatic injuries which were occurring amongst deployed personnel, in part due to the IEDs.

Some of the side effects of TBI are only starting to be understood, not unlike how it took almost a hundred years to go from trench fever to shell shock to PTSD.

I understand that 13 years is not necessarily a long time in medical terms, especially in epidemiological terms, however the US has done research that far outstrips ANYTHING the canadian medical community has done (ie nothing of note). If they are only starting to notice these side effects in the medical community then surely they should actually be in touch with the dudes suffering the symptoms.

On that note, has anyone with a TBI been contacted by any sort of medical institution to at least track your progress/symptoms?

* Mods, can we make this into a TBI sticky? *
 
I finished an application for a mild TBI with neuroendcrince dysfunction about a year ago. Took 11 months to be processed. Was denied because it was not necessarily attributable to service. They often don't show up or get diagnosed for years. So there is no record of the medical condition that no one was looking for or had even heard of at the time of my injury.

Getting a neuropsych assessment may be easier than going the organic brain injury route. Getting the drugs and hormones paid for is a bit of a nonstarter so far. Was told to appeal, but that is such a hassle. All I've wanted is drug coverage as I have grown very dependent on the replacement hormones.
 
Sorry to hear that, the medication costs can get out of control fast. In a few months I was over 3k in medication costs before coverage kicked in for that condition.
Even then my Dr and I had to justify the medication because apparently there were less expensive alternatives to treat the condition.

Can you tie it back to any events in your service? Witness testimony could help if immediate medical attention was not sought / recorded.
Curious in relation to the lack of treatment options I have for this, what medications are you finding effective?
 
A Decision was reached this morning on my application, and the letter sent according to my VAC.
Rather than wait for a week to get the hard copy and see what has come out of this prolonged process, I thought i'd give them a call as I had when my PTSD claim had
concluded and they gave me the details over the phone.

Apparently they cant do that anymore, wont say the decision or the %. In my opinion over the phone is much safer than mail as its real time and you provide about 5 security
answers.

Oh well whats another week at this point, they say that in the near future decision letters will be added to your "My VAC" account.

Its a little concerning that they are so secretive this time kind of like "I don't want to tell him it was unfavorable, let him read about it" it seems. But they verified my banking information last week so who knows im conflicted.

I'll let you know when I hear, or better yet read about it.
 
The ombudsman's office called me this morning and filled me in, it was rated at %15 - the same amount I was rated at for a broken pelvis and tailbone.. Injuries that heal in 6mths.
TBI, and more specifically diffuse axonal injury, are injuries that do not heal.

I don't really know what to say.
 
dunlop303 said:
The ombudsman's office called me this morning and filled me in, it was rated at %15 - the same amount I was rated at for a broken pelvis and tailbone.. Injuries that heal in 6mths.
TBI, and more specifically diffuse axonal injury, are injuries that do not heal.

I don't really know what to say.

Wait and see what criteria VAC determined you met according to the Table of Disabilities. From there, you can build your case for a higher Medical Impairment rating.
 
Back
Top