• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

British Military Current Events

You're giving them too much credit.

Marie Antionette Yes GIF by Lillee Jean
 
How can he afford the mess bill on such a meagre pension I wonder? ;)

Ex-RAF commander drops rank to join Honourable Artillery Company as trooper​



A former senior officer in the Royal Air Force has joined the Light Cavalry Honourable Artillery Company as a humble trooper.

Despite his former high rank, Air Marshal (Retired) Andrew Turner enters the oldest regiment in the British Army like everyone else, as the equivalent of a private.

Following a 40-year career in the RAF, Trooper Turner said joining the Army Reserve unit had been a "fantastic opportunity to continue to serve".

 
But 'muddle through' is the mission statement, right? ;)


UK Defence Spending Decisions Can’t Wait for the Strategic Defence Review​



A combination of factors has left the UK defence budget seriously out of balance. Key decisions on priorities will therefore need to be taken well before the Strategic Defence Review process concludes, with the crunch moment likely to come in the buildup to the new government’s first Budget this October.

On 16 July, Prime Minister Keir Starmer launched the government’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR), led by Lord Robertson, previously NATO Secretary-General. The Review has begun by commissioning written submissions from within the Ministry of Defence (MoD), as well as from industry, think tanks and others. This will be followed in October and November by a period of ‘Review and Challenge’, after which the Reviewers are due to submit their final report to the prime minister in the first half of 2025.

The sequence of events after the submission of the Review has not been made public, but it seems likely that the government will use the SDR to inform the decisions of its multi-year Spending Review, the outcome of which is due to be published in spring 2025. Once its budgets for the rest of this parliament have been agreed, it will then be up to the MoD to translate the Review’s broader judgements into detailed resource allocation decisions for the years ahead. On this timetable, some of the most difficult capability choices – that is, where to spend more or less – may therefore not be made until the summer of 2025.

The Funding Gap​

But not all decisions can wait until then. The MoD faces a large funding gap in the current (2024/25) financial year, and in 2025/26. In December 2023, the National Audit Office identified a deficit in the equipment plan of £3.0 billion for 2024/25 and a further deficit of £3.9 billion in 2025/26. The MoD will also need to find an extra £1 billion each year to fund the above-budget costs of the 2023 and 2024 pay settlements for the armed forces. It is an indication of the seriousness of the situation that the MoD has already asked defence contractors for any immediate ideas that they might have for reducing the pressure on this year’s budget. All new contracts valued at more than £50,000 now reportedly require ministerial sign-off, with all the additional paperwork which this involves.

The main effect of these and similar measures will be that more spending is deferred than would normally be the case. This will risk increasing lifetime project costs (through spreading work over a longer period), delaying the introduction of new capability and forcing the armed forces to extend the lifetime of older, less effective kit. These effects can be minimised if ministers use their enhanced scrutiny role to identify projects that can be cancelled (rather than delayed). But doing so will require decisions – explicit or implicit - to be made on relative priorities well in advance of the conclusion of the SDR.

 

Attachments

  • 1725905478405.jpeg
    1725905478405.jpeg
    465 bytes · Views: 5
Black bears ebullient...

Animal rights groups object to Buckingham Palace guard's distinctive bearskin caps​

An animal rights group trying to get real fur out of the bearskin caps worn by the King’s Guard at Buckingham Palace has taken aim at the cost of the ceremonial garb


LONDON -- An animal rights group trying to get real fur out of the bearskin caps worn by King's Guards at Buckingham Palace took aim Thursday at the cost of the ceremonial garb.

The price of the caps soared 30% in a year to more than 2,000 pounds ($2,600) apiece for the hats made of black bear fur, the Ministry of Defense said in response to a freedom of information request by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.

“Stop wasting taxpayer pounds on caps made from slaughtered wildlife and switch to faux fur today,” the group said in a statement.

A luxury fake fur maker has offered to supply the army with free faux bear fur for 10 years, PETA said.

The military said it was open to exploring alternatives if they pass muster in durability, water protection and appearance. But "no alternative has met all those criteria to date,” a ministry spokesperson said in a statement.

The distinctive tall black hats, worn by guards in bright scarlet tunics, are seen by millions who watch the regular changing of the guard ceremony at the palace. They also appear at other royal events including the annual Trooping the Color ceremony honoring the monarch’s birthday in June.

 

Attachments

  • 1726204890885.gif
    1726204890885.gif
    35 bytes · Views: 1
Black bears ebullient...

Animal rights groups object to Buckingham Palace guard's distinctive bearskin caps​

An animal rights group trying to get real fur out of the bearskin caps worn by the King’s Guard at Buckingham Palace has taken aim at the cost of the ceremonial garb


LONDON -- An animal rights group trying to get real fur out of the bearskin caps worn by King's Guards at Buckingham Palace took aim Thursday at the cost of the ceremonial garb.

The price of the caps soared 30% in a year to more than 2,000 pounds ($2,600) apiece for the hats made of black bear fur, the Ministry of Defense said in response to a freedom of information request by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.

“Stop wasting taxpayer pounds on caps made from slaughtered wildlife and switch to faux fur today,” the group said in a statement.

A luxury fake fur maker has offered to supply the army with free faux bear fur for 10 years, PETA said.

The military said it was open to exploring alternatives if they pass muster in durability, water protection and appearance. But "no alternative has met all those criteria to date,” a ministry spokesperson said in a statement.

The distinctive tall black hats, worn by guards in bright scarlet tunics, are seen by millions who watch the regular changing of the guard ceremony at the palace. They also appear at other royal events including the annual Trooping the Color ceremony honoring the monarch’s birthday in June.


I think they come from Canada dont they ?
 
I think they come from Canada dont they ?

Yes, from the article:

The cost of the caps rose from 1,560 pounds ($2,035) each in 2022 to 2,040 pounds ($2,660) in 2023, the ministry said. More than 1 million pounds ($1.3 million) was spent on them in the past decade.

The price went up because of a contract change for fur that comes from bears killed in licensed hunts in Canada, the military said. Each cap requires one bear pelt, PETA said.
 
Yes, from the article:

The cost of the caps rose from 1,560 pounds ($2,035) each in 2022 to 2,040 pounds ($2,660) in 2023, the ministry said. More than 1 million pounds ($1.3 million) was spent on them in the past decade.

The price went up because of a contract change for fur that comes from bears killed in licensed hunts in Canada, the military said. Each cap requires one bear pelt, PETA said.
How does one find out how to sell bear pelts? One of my coworkers is a licensed guide and kills bears fairly often.
 
How does one find out how to sell bear pelts? One of my coworkers is a licensed guide and kills bears fairly often.
Petawawa should enter the chat. You can walk five feet on that base without bumping into a black bear. I am sure they could spare a few
 
Back
Top